IN ASIA MINOR. 255
Nos. 290-291.
Mchemct Bcikicui. In the
Report, 2
cemetery.
3, No. 20.
I M P C A E S
A R M A R C V|
|V L P H I U I P P V S
FELIXI NVICTVS
GETMARCVS
See my Preliminary
Copy.
10
B.
I LI P PVS N 0 B I LI SSI
|VSCAESARVIA|
IP 0 N T E S V E T Vm
p C 0 N L A P S A S Ri
STITVEN IPER
NMMEMMIVMH
€ T F U A
0 N S T A N
;N 0 B C
15
The uncial text contains the remnants of two inscriptions. Frag-
ment A, comprising lines 1-11 inclusive, is almost complete, the
cognomen and titles of the legate alone being wanting. Inscription B
[lines 12-15 inclusive], while much more fragmentary than A, still
contains sufficient data to make its restoration certain.
A.
Imp(erator) Caes-
ar Marcu[s
JJulius Philippus
[Pius] Felix Invictus
[AJugustus et Marcu[s]
[Jul(ius) PJhilippus nobilissi-
[m]us Caesar via[s]
[et] pontes vetu[s-]
Nos. 290-291.
Mchemct Bcikicui. In the
Report, 2
cemetery.
3, No. 20.
I M P C A E S
A R M A R C V|
|V L P H I U I P P V S
FELIXI NVICTVS
GETMARCVS
See my Preliminary
Copy.
10
B.
I LI P PVS N 0 B I LI SSI
|VSCAESARVIA|
IP 0 N T E S V E T Vm
p C 0 N L A P S A S Ri
STITVEN IPER
NMMEMMIVMH
€ T F U A
0 N S T A N
;N 0 B C
15
The uncial text contains the remnants of two inscriptions. Frag-
ment A, comprising lines 1-11 inclusive, is almost complete, the
cognomen and titles of the legate alone being wanting. Inscription B
[lines 12-15 inclusive], while much more fragmentary than A, still
contains sufficient data to make its restoration certain.
A.
Imp(erator) Caes-
ar Marcu[s
JJulius Philippus
[Pius] Felix Invictus
[AJugustus et Marcu[s]
[Jul(ius) PJhilippus nobilissi-
[m]us Caesar via[s]
[et] pontes vetu[s-]