Papers of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens (4.1885-1886)

on greek versification in inscriptions. JJ

was AioyeV???, like ATdSwpos, etc. See Soph. Ai. 91, Aesch. Sept. 127.
But the existence of 810s made the change easier.

Or the succession w__^ made the trouble :

IlocraSajnoii laOi, lxxxiii (Cyme iii-ii).
1 2 3

Here would be put Sawrdvopos or Acordvopos in cxxn (see p. 74) if
any dependence could be placed on these readings.

I am uncertain whether the quantity eV 'Apd68oi.o pofalvi, 180

4 5 0

(Core, vi), is normal or not. Lycophron and Callimachus1 have
"kpaidos with a. *ApaT0os, "Kpay6o<;, "Apatflos, are surely the same
river. "ApaxOos (now removed from Livy and Polybius) is confined
to the later sources; and I feel sure that APAIOOS is nothing but
an ancient clerical blunder for APATOOS, as Kramer and Ross long
since pointed out.

Gratuitous tampering with quantity is much less frequent. In
proper names I note :

Xios ayaXkop.ivq, pentam., 88 (Att. iv-ii) ; name of island.'-
12 3

'ApTe/xrji QIoKpiTov, cxLin (Delos, unknown).
234

Olv6j3Lo<; Attoi/o?, 220 (Amorg. iv) ;

12 3

against AiW in Anthol. Pal. vii, 99 (Plat, epigr. 7 Bgk.). It is not
likely that AiW has anything to do with Stos: more probably it is
short for AtdSoros and like names. For

KAewtkn 'Epp.ay6pov, 809 (Pharos ii),
1 2 3 .

it is better to assume crasis. — Neubauer's construction of lxxviii

(Cypriote) makes Fido^u 'AAc/rdrrys (with crasis, or rather aphaeresis :
3 4

see p. 48). What he means 'AAe/roT??; to be, I know not. By the
omission of x°°>'> it would be possible to understand 'AAc/tmt^s -
'AAcu-rr/s as a gentile. See Appendix, p. 1S7. But the whole is

1 Lycophr. 409 ; Call. frag. 203 Serin.

2 Similarly in Anthol. Pal. vii, 510 (Simonid. epigram 119 Bgk.), according to
the manuscripts.