128
on greek versification in inscriptions.
a- ttotvl 6.ymvu>v, 856 a prf. (Hyp. expvaa apcr-jv, pent., 60 (Att. iv-ii).
Mac), not verified. 8o£a apery, 65 (Att. iv—ii), not
1 2
yeverup' dpyaAe'015. pent., lxxxiii verified, Kum.
3 4 -,
(Cyme iii-ii), not verified. SeiKvCua ava^alvu, 84 (Att. iv-ii),
not verified, Kum.
p.aia ayava (— w--), lyric,
XCVII41. 50 (Epid. iii).
c- 'HpaxAei' e£«, pent., 488 (Tanag. v).
2 34
over Wavov, 91 (Att. iv).
3 4
o-Tep^aa 'Epfis, 35 a add. (Att. iv),
3 4
not verified.
yaT iKaXvipav, 51 (Att. iv—ii).
5 6
Opi-TTTtip £vapy](f>6pe, 856 a prf.
3 4
(Hyp. Mac), not verified.
/jLoip' iSa/xacrae, cxxviii (Syb. ii),
not verified.
(?) irpuiip \i]yKT£Tdvvo-Tal, 96 (Att. iv-ii).1
5 0
n- [\l]itovo-' rjfirjv, 84a RM (Att. iii).
4 a
iviirovo-' y)Xv9', lyric, xcvn4 1. 38
(Epid. iii).
o- AaxoiV oVo/xa, pent., 6 (Att.vi). (?) [xejonra or', cxxh (Phars. v)
5 0 2
o-repiao-' oltri, pent., 35 a add. acc to Cauer: similarly Lol-
,. f . ? •/- , nng- See p. 198.
(Att. iv), not verified. 1 y
1 It is certain what the graver cut in this puzzling place, but very uncertain
what was meant to be cut. The stone, now in the Central Museum, has
A ETP PQ. I PI T KTE etc., every letter being perfectly distinct. To me it
seems clear, first that [~K is a dittography, K being put in to correct the [~; and
secondly that we have a conflation of the two readings 7rspl 5' Ik irpdiipi) rtravv-
(tto.1 and 7rcol Si -rrpwip' iKTerdvuiTTai, owing to a boggled and indistinct manu-
script copy, which had been put into the graver's hands.
on greek versification in inscriptions.
a- ttotvl 6.ymvu>v, 856 a prf. (Hyp. expvaa apcr-jv, pent., 60 (Att. iv-ii).
Mac), not verified. 8o£a apery, 65 (Att. iv—ii), not
1 2
yeverup' dpyaAe'015. pent., lxxxiii verified, Kum.
3 4 -,
(Cyme iii-ii), not verified. SeiKvCua ava^alvu, 84 (Att. iv-ii),
not verified, Kum.
p.aia ayava (— w--), lyric,
XCVII41. 50 (Epid. iii).
c- 'HpaxAei' e£«, pent., 488 (Tanag. v).
2 34
over Wavov, 91 (Att. iv).
3 4
o-Tep^aa 'Epfis, 35 a add. (Att. iv),
3 4
not verified.
yaT iKaXvipav, 51 (Att. iv—ii).
5 6
Opi-TTTtip £vapy](f>6pe, 856 a prf.
3 4
(Hyp. Mac), not verified.
/jLoip' iSa/xacrae, cxxviii (Syb. ii),
not verified.
(?) irpuiip \i]yKT£Tdvvo-Tal, 96 (Att. iv-ii).1
5 0
n- [\l]itovo-' rjfirjv, 84a RM (Att. iii).
4 a
iviirovo-' y)Xv9', lyric, xcvn4 1. 38
(Epid. iii).
o- AaxoiV oVo/xa, pent., 6 (Att.vi). (?) [xejonra or', cxxh (Phars. v)
5 0 2
o-repiao-' oltri, pent., 35 a add. acc to Cauer: similarly Lol-
,. f . ? •/- , nng- See p. 198.
(Att. iv), not verified. 1 y
1 It is certain what the graver cut in this puzzling place, but very uncertain
what was meant to be cut. The stone, now in the Central Museum, has
A ETP PQ. I PI T KTE etc., every letter being perfectly distinct. To me it
seems clear, first that [~K is a dittography, K being put in to correct the [~; and
secondly that we have a conflation of the two readings 7rspl 5' Ik irpdiipi) rtravv-
(tto.1 and 7rcol Si -rrpwip' iKTerdvuiTTai, owing to a boggled and indistinct manu-
script copy, which had been put into the graver's hands.