ON GREEK VERSIFICATION IN INSCRIPTIONS. 167
Kaibel.
Elsewhere Published.
Place.
Age.
Metre.
Nr.
Verses.
235
Monatsber. Berl. Akad.
Smyrna
iii
el.
4
1S74, p. 727.
239
CIG. 3326.
Mac.
cl.
6
240
" 3328-
ei.
8
242 1
" 2168. Bechtel, Col-
Mytilene
el.
5 +
litz, Dial. n. 217.
246
Lebas v. 1145.
Bithyn.
i. t.
8
249 .
Wien. Akad. 1864 (xm),
Byzant.
u
el.
4
p. 49.
254
Lebas vn. 2S02.
Cyprus
IV—111
el.
4
25S
Lib. 2013. lijiu. 11. 3°9*
el.
4
258
>A(?7jj/dioi'J III. p. 22.
/Vlexan-
i. t.
9
n^"a ■
200
ijlu. lJ- .DLLiLr i\ev.
Cyrenai-
el.
0
ArCn. I ooO (^\ 11 p. 2yj.
ca
401 a
Lenovmant, Rhein. Mus.
Megara
VI
hex
1
aud.-
xxi, p. 390, n. 230. IGA.
463 a
14.
IGA. 15.
Corinth
1
add.
46611
CIG. 1141. New copy, Mit-
Argos
Mac.
cl.
2
theil. IV. (1879), p. 158.
469
CIG. 1155.
el.
2
471 a
Mittheilungen I. (1876),
Sparta
iv
el.
4
add.
472
IGA. 54. Lowy 22.
vi
hex.
1 ?
484
" 7«5-
Tanagra
V
hex.
1
486
" 146.
Thespiae
c<
el.
2
487
" l67\
Thisbe
tt
el.
2
488
Hermes viii. p. 422.
Tanagra?
el.
4
489
Lebas III. 553.
Thebes
iv
el. + hex.
6.1
490 1
CIG. 1652.
Mac.
el. irr.
4
491
Missions Scientif. 1867,
Orchom.
ii
el.
8
p. 498.
1 The absence of i in the dative arpiaroi is dialectic.
2 The authenticity of this inscription is doubted by Kaibel and Roehl.
3 From a comparison of Milchhoefer's new copy with the older ones of Four-
mont and Lebas, it seems probable that the first line should read . . . a68ev 7)5e
Kaibel.
Elsewhere Published.
Place.
Age.
Metre.
Nr.
Verses.
235
Monatsber. Berl. Akad.
Smyrna
iii
el.
4
1S74, p. 727.
239
CIG. 3326.
Mac.
cl.
6
240
" 3328-
ei.
8
242 1
" 2168. Bechtel, Col-
Mytilene
el.
5 +
litz, Dial. n. 217.
246
Lebas v. 1145.
Bithyn.
i. t.
8
249 .
Wien. Akad. 1864 (xm),
Byzant.
u
el.
4
p. 49.
254
Lebas vn. 2S02.
Cyprus
IV—111
el.
4
25S
Lib. 2013. lijiu. 11. 3°9*
el.
4
258
>A(?7jj/dioi'J III. p. 22.
/Vlexan-
i. t.
9
n^"a ■
200
ijlu. lJ- .DLLiLr i\ev.
Cyrenai-
el.
0
ArCn. I ooO (^\ 11 p. 2yj.
ca
401 a
Lenovmant, Rhein. Mus.
Megara
VI
hex
1
aud.-
xxi, p. 390, n. 230. IGA.
463 a
14.
IGA. 15.
Corinth
1
add.
46611
CIG. 1141. New copy, Mit-
Argos
Mac.
cl.
2
theil. IV. (1879), p. 158.
469
CIG. 1155.
el.
2
471 a
Mittheilungen I. (1876),
Sparta
iv
el.
4
add.
472
IGA. 54. Lowy 22.
vi
hex.
1 ?
484
" 7«5-
Tanagra
V
hex.
1
486
" 146.
Thespiae
c<
el.
2
487
" l67\
Thisbe
tt
el.
2
488
Hermes viii. p. 422.
Tanagra?
el.
4
489
Lebas III. 553.
Thebes
iv
el. + hex.
6.1
490 1
CIG. 1652.
Mac.
el. irr.
4
491
Missions Scientif. 1867,
Orchom.
ii
el.
8
p. 498.
1 The absence of i in the dative arpiaroi is dialectic.
2 The authenticity of this inscription is doubted by Kaibel and Roehl.
3 From a comparison of Milchhoefer's new copy with the older ones of Four-
mont and Lebas, it seems probable that the first line should read . . . a68ev 7)5e