DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.45245#0066
50
HALIKARNASSOS.
35
45
AIPAPEONTOS
ΑΡΤΕΡΟΣΔΕΙΝΑΙΓ
TOTEIXONOTEZ
ΜΥΗΣΕΜΝΗΜΟ
ΔΆΠΕΠΕΡΑΣΑ/
-ΙΛ/ΤΙΞΟΕΛΗΙ
ΫΗΦΟΛΤ1ΣΤΕ/
Α/ΤΟΥΤΟ^ΤΑΕΘΛ
ΡΑΙΤηΠΟΛΑΠ/
ΥΤΟΝΦΕΥΓΕΝ/'
ΗΙΑΞΙΑΔΕΡΑ
ΕΠΡΗΣΘΑΙΕΠι
αμαραοθδθλ
ΗΣΣΟΝΑΑΙΡΑ
ΥΜΠΑ/^ΤΠ/^Τ
^ΑΙΟΣΑΝΤΑνΤΑ/
I ΕΡΤΑΟΡΡΙΑΕΤΑ
ΑΙ ΕΛΗfill ΑΠΟΛΑ
ΝΕΣΤΗΡΟΤΟΣΠ
ΑΙΟΙΚ1Ρ1ΝΘΙΤΙΝΕ>
χΛίΙ/^ΙΔΗΣΚΑΙΠΑΛ^Α
ΟΝΕΙΜΗΥΣΤΕΡ6
ν/νοΜΟΔΠΟΥΤΟΔ
ΧΕΑΙΗΠΡΟΟΗΤΑ
ΔΆΙΤΟ/Χ/^ΘΜΟ
ΑΥΤΟΠΕΠΡΗΣΟΏ.
ΕΙ/^ΑΙ ΙΕΡΑΚΑΙA
ΗΛ/ΔΕΜΗΗΙΑΥ"
ΤΗΡΏ./ν ΑΥΤΟ/
ΓΏΓΗΙΚΑΙΜΗ
ΑΙΕΣΑΛΙΡΑΡΝ
ςςεώνδετώςς
ΏΙΕΑΕΥΟΕΡΘΝ'
xPABAl/^HIPATG
ΚΑΙΏΣΓΕΓΡΑΠ
ΊΙΕΓΙΡΑΑΕΛ7
give here a facsimile
of
5
IO
15
20
25
3°
35
41
45
It will be convenient to
Lord Charlemont’s copy:—
TA4f0· -ΛΑ0Ρ0
OAAiKAPMATF MY KA/ $ΑΛΜΑ K
.ξΛΚΚΑ ίΛΥΓΛΑΜ ir £Nrnnepi
ta Ji-. λΟ£ π,Λ ^ο^ίόςγρ
gp · · ο 1 £ κ υ / λ η /ν ε
ΔΙΔΟ · ΙΜΗΤεΛ^ί^ Γ
·. ΤΟΙί Λ| ΗΜΟr I Λ/£· ΠΜΓΠΟα V
NJ 4 Γ Π Τ ΘΛΐΓΑΛΗ ΙΘΣΑΙMF>*!OV
ο*jo* καιϊ^μμυτιτοκατρ
WAT 10Γ Η Α/4 C TJX ΟΓΛ Η U l KATE
ί0/Ι/ηεΡ1ΓΗΧΗ0/Κ1Λ/νεΓΙΚ4Λ
TZ)E**/0 ΚΤΛ ΚΑΙΛΓΚΑΜΗΓΙΙΥΑΠΌΤ
ANOlftV ΗΜΟ//£££[££ ίίχι^τύτ Π
Κ ΑΡΤΕΡΦΜεΝ AlHMAETltYiTF
ΕΠ’/ ΜΛΚΊ Τ0ΥΤ0Τ0* POWOT/2.U
ΟΚΤΛΚΑΗΕΚΑΜΗΛΠΝΘΡΚΟΜΕΜΑΠ
ΟΡΝΕΜΟΜΕΑ/η/ΤΗΓ ΓΗΝΗΤΑΟΙ Ρ
ΑΟΡΚΟΝΑΕΤΟ^ΔΙ ΚΌΣΤΑΣ ΗΜ
KTOMAF-A ΜΕΜΟΤ ΤΟΝΑΕΟΡΚΟ^Π
ΑΙΠΑΡΕονΤΟίΤΟΕΝΕΕΤΗΚβΤΟΕ
ΑΡΤΕ Ρ ΟΣ Λ ΕIΝ A1Γ ΚΑΙΘΙ KIQNCNW
ΐΟΤΕΙΧ Ο/ΥΦτΕΆ ΤΓΦλ Λ J2 ΝΙΔ ΗΣ
λιυη1ΤΜ/ΥΗΛ16?Α/ΕΥ0ΝΕΙΜΗΥ£τΕΡ
U δ ττ ε Γ τ PAf Ατο Vyo k
\Here begins another page of the Diary.]
wmssksskssh
HΑΛΙΚΛΡ»
γηπΑ ΓΡΛ ΝΔ £TJ7r?
W A VTA Y T A Λ H
ΙΑτ,®ΑΛΛ...|ΓΠΙΚΑΛΕΝ
This important inscription has been commented
upon by many scholars, but no general agreement
has been arrived at as to its meaning I will how-
ever only refer to the different views that have been
r]at παρεόντος [Prov ε^νεστηκότος' κ¬
αρτερούν 8' εϊναι yp/y κ]αι οίκίων, οϊτινες
30 τότ ίΓχοι/, οτε ’/^πολ^λωζ,/δτ/ί καί Πανα-
μύης εμνημόγνευ^ον, εί μη ύστερο-
ν άπεπερασαν. [Tojy νόμον τούτον
ην tls θελτ) [σνγ]χεαΐ ή προθητα-
ί] ψήφον ώστε μ[η εΐ]ναι τον νόμο-
35 ν τούτον, τά έόν[τα] αυτού πεπρήσθω
και τώττόλλω^ο?] είναι ιερά και α-
υτόν φεύγεν α[ΐεί·] ην δε μη y αύτ-
ω άξια δέκα [στατήρων, αυτόν [ττ-
επρησθαι επί [e^ajycoy^ και μη [δ-
40 αμά κάθοδον [eirjai ey ' Αλικαρν-
ησσόν. *Αλικα[ρνα]σσέων δε των σ-
υμττάντων τ[ουτ]ω ελεύθερον e[?-
ναι os αν ταύτα μ[η πα^ραβαίντ) κατό-
περ τά ορκια ετα[μον] καί coy γεγραπ^τ-
45 cu όν τω Ά7τολλ[ωι/Γ]ω επικαλέν.
proposed so far as is necessary in stating my own
explanation. I must first notice some epigraphic
and dialectic peculiarities. We find four times (lines
2, 6, and 16—comp, my remarks to 1. 7) the symbol
T, which we see from the inscription itself was con-
sidered as an equivalent of σσ (comp. 1. 2 with
lines 40 and 41 and see Rud. Krause, de Panyasside,
Dissert. Goetting. 1891, p. 7 foil.). It is used only
once in the name of the Halikarnassians, and its place
is twice usurped by σ<τ, whence it may be inferred that
the symbol T was going out of use. It has been
rightly observed, that this symbol occurs only in
proper names of a non-Hellenic character ; and this
also is true of its use on coins of the Thracian town
Mesembria, where it afterwards gave way to a simple
σ. I should not like to lay too much stress on its
occurrence in the word θαλάττης at Teos (see Roehl,
Inscr. Gr. Ant. No. 497) since the only authority
for that is a copy made in the last century. On this
letter see W- Larfeld, Gr. Epigraphik (in Handbk.
der Klass, Alterthumswissensch. I2, p. 510).
Throughout this inscription the O has a dot in the
middle like the O, and the same peculiarity occurs
in the Ώ of the last five lines. It will be seen from
Roehl (Inscr. Gr. Antiquissim.) that this O with a dot
in the middle was used in various parts of Greece in
very ancient times. There was no danger of con-
fusion until the letter Θ came to assume the same
form. But even after that the O with a dot in the
middle was retained, as in our inscription, to a wider
extent than is generally known. (C. Keil, Jahrb. f.
Philol. und Paedag. Suppl. vol. ii, p. 369 and p. 385,
note 38.) We may add some instances from Athens
and Attika (see Athen. Mitth. ix, p. 389, Άθήναιον,
vii, p. 369); from Elateia (see Bull, de Corr. Hell,
vol. x, p. 367, No. 9, where Π also is dotted, and vol.
xi, p. 326,No. 3); from Heraia (see Athen. Mitth. vii,
p. 377 on an iron coin) ; from Mytilene (see Conze,
Lesbos, pl. vi, 1); from Assos (American Papers,
vol. i, p. 5, No. iii); from Halikarnassos, see below
No. dccccii; from Olbia (Latyschev, Inscr. Ant.
Orae Septentr. Ponti Euxini, Nos. 8 and 120); and
from Kroton, on an archaic coin (Brit. Mus. Cat. of
HALIKARNASSOS.
35
45
AIPAPEONTOS
ΑΡΤΕΡΟΣΔΕΙΝΑΙΓ
TOTEIXONOTEZ
ΜΥΗΣΕΜΝΗΜΟ
ΔΆΠΕΠΕΡΑΣΑ/
-ΙΛ/ΤΙΞΟΕΛΗΙ
ΫΗΦΟΛΤ1ΣΤΕ/
Α/ΤΟΥΤΟ^ΤΑΕΘΛ
ΡΑΙΤηΠΟΛΑΠ/
ΥΤΟΝΦΕΥΓΕΝ/'
ΗΙΑΞΙΑΔΕΡΑ
ΕΠΡΗΣΘΑΙΕΠι
αμαραοθδθλ
ΗΣΣΟΝΑΑΙΡΑ
ΥΜΠΑ/^ΤΠ/^Τ
^ΑΙΟΣΑΝΤΑνΤΑ/
I ΕΡΤΑΟΡΡΙΑΕΤΑ
ΑΙ ΕΛΗfill ΑΠΟΛΑ
ΝΕΣΤΗΡΟΤΟΣΠ
ΑΙΟΙΚ1Ρ1ΝΘΙΤΙΝΕ>
χΛίΙ/^ΙΔΗΣΚΑΙΠΑΛ^Α
ΟΝΕΙΜΗΥΣΤΕΡ6
ν/νοΜΟΔΠΟΥΤΟΔ
ΧΕΑΙΗΠΡΟΟΗΤΑ
ΔΆΙΤΟ/Χ/^ΘΜΟ
ΑΥΤΟΠΕΠΡΗΣΟΏ.
ΕΙ/^ΑΙ ΙΕΡΑΚΑΙA
ΗΛ/ΔΕΜΗΗΙΑΥ"
ΤΗΡΏ./ν ΑΥΤΟ/
ΓΏΓΗΙΚΑΙΜΗ
ΑΙΕΣΑΛΙΡΑΡΝ
ςςεώνδετώςς
ΏΙΕΑΕΥΟΕΡΘΝ'
xPABAl/^HIPATG
ΚΑΙΏΣΓΕΓΡΑΠ
ΊΙΕΓΙΡΑΑΕΛ7
give here a facsimile
of
5
IO
15
20
25
3°
35
41
45
It will be convenient to
Lord Charlemont’s copy:—
TA4f0· -ΛΑ0Ρ0
OAAiKAPMATF MY KA/ $ΑΛΜΑ K
.ξΛΚΚΑ ίΛΥΓΛΑΜ ir £Nrnnepi
ta Ji-. λΟ£ π,Λ ^ο^ίόςγρ
gp · · ο 1 £ κ υ / λ η /ν ε
ΔΙΔΟ · ΙΜΗΤεΛ^ί^ Γ
·. ΤΟΙί Λ| ΗΜΟr I Λ/£· ΠΜΓΠΟα V
NJ 4 Γ Π Τ ΘΛΐΓΑΛΗ ΙΘΣΑΙMF>*!OV
ο*jo* καιϊ^μμυτιτοκατρ
WAT 10Γ Η Α/4 C TJX ΟΓΛ Η U l KATE
ί0/Ι/ηεΡ1ΓΗΧΗ0/Κ1Λ/νεΓΙΚ4Λ
TZ)E**/0 ΚΤΛ ΚΑΙΛΓΚΑΜΗΓΙΙΥΑΠΌΤ
ANOlftV ΗΜΟ//£££[££ ίίχι^τύτ Π
Κ ΑΡΤΕΡΦΜεΝ AlHMAETltYiTF
ΕΠ’/ ΜΛΚΊ Τ0ΥΤ0Τ0* POWOT/2.U
ΟΚΤΛΚΑΗΕΚΑΜΗΛΠΝΘΡΚΟΜΕΜΑΠ
ΟΡΝΕΜΟΜΕΑ/η/ΤΗΓ ΓΗΝΗΤΑΟΙ Ρ
ΑΟΡΚΟΝΑΕΤΟ^ΔΙ ΚΌΣΤΑΣ ΗΜ
KTOMAF-A ΜΕΜΟΤ ΤΟΝΑΕΟΡΚΟ^Π
ΑΙΠΑΡΕονΤΟίΤΟΕΝΕΕΤΗΚβΤΟΕ
ΑΡΤΕ Ρ ΟΣ Λ ΕIΝ A1Γ ΚΑΙΘΙ KIQNCNW
ΐΟΤΕΙΧ Ο/ΥΦτΕΆ ΤΓΦλ Λ J2 ΝΙΔ ΗΣ
λιυη1ΤΜ/ΥΗΛ16?Α/ΕΥ0ΝΕΙΜΗΥ£τΕΡ
U δ ττ ε Γ τ PAf Ατο Vyo k
\Here begins another page of the Diary.]
wmssksskssh
HΑΛΙΚΛΡ»
γηπΑ ΓΡΛ ΝΔ £TJ7r?
W A VTA Y T A Λ H
ΙΑτ,®ΑΛΛ...|ΓΠΙΚΑΛΕΝ
This important inscription has been commented
upon by many scholars, but no general agreement
has been arrived at as to its meaning I will how-
ever only refer to the different views that have been
r]at παρεόντος [Prov ε^νεστηκότος' κ¬
αρτερούν 8' εϊναι yp/y κ]αι οίκίων, οϊτινες
30 τότ ίΓχοι/, οτε ’/^πολ^λωζ,/δτ/ί καί Πανα-
μύης εμνημόγνευ^ον, εί μη ύστερο-
ν άπεπερασαν. [Tojy νόμον τούτον
ην tls θελτ) [σνγ]χεαΐ ή προθητα-
ί] ψήφον ώστε μ[η εΐ]ναι τον νόμο-
35 ν τούτον, τά έόν[τα] αυτού πεπρήσθω
και τώττόλλω^ο?] είναι ιερά και α-
υτόν φεύγεν α[ΐεί·] ην δε μη y αύτ-
ω άξια δέκα [στατήρων, αυτόν [ττ-
επρησθαι επί [e^ajycoy^ και μη [δ-
40 αμά κάθοδον [eirjai ey ' Αλικαρν-
ησσόν. *Αλικα[ρνα]σσέων δε των σ-
υμττάντων τ[ουτ]ω ελεύθερον e[?-
ναι os αν ταύτα μ[η πα^ραβαίντ) κατό-
περ τά ορκια ετα[μον] καί coy γεγραπ^τ-
45 cu όν τω Ά7τολλ[ωι/Γ]ω επικαλέν.
proposed so far as is necessary in stating my own
explanation. I must first notice some epigraphic
and dialectic peculiarities. We find four times (lines
2, 6, and 16—comp, my remarks to 1. 7) the symbol
T, which we see from the inscription itself was con-
sidered as an equivalent of σσ (comp. 1. 2 with
lines 40 and 41 and see Rud. Krause, de Panyasside,
Dissert. Goetting. 1891, p. 7 foil.). It is used only
once in the name of the Halikarnassians, and its place
is twice usurped by σ<τ, whence it may be inferred that
the symbol T was going out of use. It has been
rightly observed, that this symbol occurs only in
proper names of a non-Hellenic character ; and this
also is true of its use on coins of the Thracian town
Mesembria, where it afterwards gave way to a simple
σ. I should not like to lay too much stress on its
occurrence in the word θαλάττης at Teos (see Roehl,
Inscr. Gr. Ant. No. 497) since the only authority
for that is a copy made in the last century. On this
letter see W- Larfeld, Gr. Epigraphik (in Handbk.
der Klass, Alterthumswissensch. I2, p. 510).
Throughout this inscription the O has a dot in the
middle like the O, and the same peculiarity occurs
in the Ώ of the last five lines. It will be seen from
Roehl (Inscr. Gr. Antiquissim.) that this O with a dot
in the middle was used in various parts of Greece in
very ancient times. There was no danger of con-
fusion until the letter Θ came to assume the same
form. But even after that the O with a dot in the
middle was retained, as in our inscription, to a wider
extent than is generally known. (C. Keil, Jahrb. f.
Philol. und Paedag. Suppl. vol. ii, p. 369 and p. 385,
note 38.) We may add some instances from Athens
and Attika (see Athen. Mitth. ix, p. 389, Άθήναιον,
vii, p. 369); from Elateia (see Bull, de Corr. Hell,
vol. x, p. 367, No. 9, where Π also is dotted, and vol.
xi, p. 326,No. 3); from Heraia (see Athen. Mitth. vii,
p. 377 on an iron coin) ; from Mytilene (see Conze,
Lesbos, pl. vi, 1); from Assos (American Papers,
vol. i, p. 5, No. iii); from Halikarnassos, see below
No. dccccii; from Olbia (Latyschev, Inscr. Ant.
Orae Septentr. Ponti Euxini, Nos. 8 and 120); and
from Kroton, on an archaic coin (Brit. Mus. Cat. of