88
Addenda et Corrigenda.
given as 12 feet (the central one as 20 feet), and this would make the oot hardly
0*27 metre. The artist, whoever he may be, appears only to have copied some original
which is not known to me : for upon the same leaf he has drawings of the capital of the
pilasters of the Basilica Aemilia and of its Doric entablature, the former of which is
entitled ' firuluario,' the latter 'cornice di Farabino '—both corruptions of the name Foro
Boario (often, applied to the ruins of this building by sixteenth-century artists—see
Lanciani, Storia degli Scavi, i. 94). But it cannot be assumed that the differences between
his representation of the Caryatid and that of Coner are due to carelessness on his part,
for Giuliano da Sangallo's drawing possesses, as we have seen, precisely the same
characteristics. It is a curious fact, however, that both Giuliano da Sangallo and Coner
show the same kind of plinth, and, further, that while the former has, immediately below
the front view of the figure, another view in profile, Coner places immediately below the
plinth a moulding which suggests the top of the capital of the head beneath. (The heads
in profile, which are drawn in pencil on the lower part of the leaf, are on a larger scale.)
But these considerations can hardly outweigh the differences already noted. We must,
therefore, suppose either that Coner has in this case rendered his subject with far less
accuracy than is usually the case, or that both these Caryatids belonged to the same
building (probably some part of the Forum of Augustus): and there seems to be no reason
why so slight a difference in type should make the latter theory an impossible one.
P. 59, 1. 4 sqq.—This paragraph applies only to the Caryatid drawn by Coner.
P. 61, No. 123. —Dr. Egger informs me that this capital probably belongs to the villa of Hadrian
near Tibur ; and the expression 'a tibure' may have this meaning in other cases.
Appendix I, p. 75 sqq.—Mr. W. M. Voynich has been kind enough to give me additional
information as to some of the less-known works mentioned in the inventory, which I
reproduce below :—
' Opus Jo. Verneri '—possibly Johannes de Vernay, 1473 (Hain 16014).
'Hieronis n^wpariKa.'There are many sixteenth-century editions of Hero's
nvev^aTiKa.
' Opusculum Amerucii philosophi grecum cum figuris mathematicis.' Georgius
Amyrutzius (called Georgius philosophus), a Byzantine theologian, who died
about the year 1465.
' Etymologica Greca'—the 'ETupoAoynchv ^ya, 1499 (Hain 6691).
' Fasciculus temporum'—the author is Werner Rolewinck (Hain 6914-6946).
'Summa Aritmetice et geometriae vulgari'—the author is Pietro Borgo (Hain
3659-3662).
' Acta Concilii Constantiensis.' See Hain 5608-9.
'Canones Astrolabii latini scripti.' See Hain 1898, Proctor $169.
' Historia vulgaris Marci Poli Veneti scripta.' See Hain 13243.
' Grammatica Theodori Gazae.' See Hain 7500.
'Apicius de re Coquinaria.' The first edition is Hain 1282 (undated) : the next, Hain
1283 (1498).
' Aritmetica vulgaris alias summa Aritmetice fratris Lucae.' Lucas de Burgo [or
Paccioli] (Hain 4105—a Venetian edition of 1494).
Appendix IV, p. 83, 1. 6.—It should have been added that the titles and signatures of the respective
engravings are-
No. 353.—' Mostra della giostra fatta nel Teatro di Palazzo.'... Ant. Lafreri
formis. HCB fecit' (the engraver is Jacopo Binck according to Ferri,
H(enricus) C(livensis) B(elga) according to Hiilsen).
No. 354.—' Dissigno del Tornameto . . . per Ant. Lafreri formis 1565. Stefanus
Du Perac fecit.'
No. 355. —'Ants. Lafreri, Rome. An. 1565.'
Addenda et Corrigenda.
given as 12 feet (the central one as 20 feet), and this would make the oot hardly
0*27 metre. The artist, whoever he may be, appears only to have copied some original
which is not known to me : for upon the same leaf he has drawings of the capital of the
pilasters of the Basilica Aemilia and of its Doric entablature, the former of which is
entitled ' firuluario,' the latter 'cornice di Farabino '—both corruptions of the name Foro
Boario (often, applied to the ruins of this building by sixteenth-century artists—see
Lanciani, Storia degli Scavi, i. 94). But it cannot be assumed that the differences between
his representation of the Caryatid and that of Coner are due to carelessness on his part,
for Giuliano da Sangallo's drawing possesses, as we have seen, precisely the same
characteristics. It is a curious fact, however, that both Giuliano da Sangallo and Coner
show the same kind of plinth, and, further, that while the former has, immediately below
the front view of the figure, another view in profile, Coner places immediately below the
plinth a moulding which suggests the top of the capital of the head beneath. (The heads
in profile, which are drawn in pencil on the lower part of the leaf, are on a larger scale.)
But these considerations can hardly outweigh the differences already noted. We must,
therefore, suppose either that Coner has in this case rendered his subject with far less
accuracy than is usually the case, or that both these Caryatids belonged to the same
building (probably some part of the Forum of Augustus): and there seems to be no reason
why so slight a difference in type should make the latter theory an impossible one.
P. 59, 1. 4 sqq.—This paragraph applies only to the Caryatid drawn by Coner.
P. 61, No. 123. —Dr. Egger informs me that this capital probably belongs to the villa of Hadrian
near Tibur ; and the expression 'a tibure' may have this meaning in other cases.
Appendix I, p. 75 sqq.—Mr. W. M. Voynich has been kind enough to give me additional
information as to some of the less-known works mentioned in the inventory, which I
reproduce below :—
' Opus Jo. Verneri '—possibly Johannes de Vernay, 1473 (Hain 16014).
'Hieronis n^wpariKa.'There are many sixteenth-century editions of Hero's
nvev^aTiKa.
' Opusculum Amerucii philosophi grecum cum figuris mathematicis.' Georgius
Amyrutzius (called Georgius philosophus), a Byzantine theologian, who died
about the year 1465.
' Etymologica Greca'—the 'ETupoAoynchv ^ya, 1499 (Hain 6691).
' Fasciculus temporum'—the author is Werner Rolewinck (Hain 6914-6946).
'Summa Aritmetice et geometriae vulgari'—the author is Pietro Borgo (Hain
3659-3662).
' Acta Concilii Constantiensis.' See Hain 5608-9.
'Canones Astrolabii latini scripti.' See Hain 1898, Proctor $169.
' Historia vulgaris Marci Poli Veneti scripta.' See Hain 13243.
' Grammatica Theodori Gazae.' See Hain 7500.
'Apicius de re Coquinaria.' The first edition is Hain 1282 (undated) : the next, Hain
1283 (1498).
' Aritmetica vulgaris alias summa Aritmetice fratris Lucae.' Lucas de Burgo [or
Paccioli] (Hain 4105—a Venetian edition of 1494).
Appendix IV, p. 83, 1. 6.—It should have been added that the titles and signatures of the respective
engravings are-
No. 353.—' Mostra della giostra fatta nel Teatro di Palazzo.'... Ant. Lafreri
formis. HCB fecit' (the engraver is Jacopo Binck according to Ferri,
H(enricus) C(livensis) B(elga) according to Hiilsen).
No. 354.—' Dissigno del Tornameto . . . per Ant. Lafreri formis 1565. Stefanus
Du Perac fecit.'
No. 355. —'Ants. Lafreri, Rome. An. 1565.'