#83^3 )( 198 )( §83Sg§
Judici facultatem competere poenas Jure definitas juRa ex causa minuere & miti-
gare, id quod hodiernis moribus certo certius esf pracficx quotidiana tam fori
Bocmici,quam5axonici hoc comprobantis*
3+ His itaque pnemisfis relpondemus ad quxsfionem propositam: quod
judex posht in deti&is notoriis,& per delinquentem confessatis non opposita prx-
scriptione hanc exceptionem ex officio attendere, ita, ut licet reus delidfum con-
fcsfis fuerit, tamen si ex adis appareat punitionem essepraescriptam, talis con-
Mho non noceat conhtenti; ita Probor, 272 pr,?x2 ^2772222^/2 /zZh i+
i o. /V. M. Zdiyp o&z/y & 272pr.iA (77777272. §. N. IO, ^ 272 Z*/272.
77.2.^ do ///d/r, 222 L< i, §, 6$)^ ^ do
/2P. 1, (072(/. N* 1,^ ^ co/F^ qgLN* g. ^dC^, /272, & do/(g. ubi
dicit: y 2/od /2772.7/0^0222772 o/Z 720/0^222777, ^772072 Z^/22772 /2/ /0772p/2y d.?//^72 %d 272^72ro72da772,
Ox/o7772j/?.72'2//2, ^^Ty/o^rOF/yOOFT/s^O^F/s 772^/^202^2772 , 72O72j7O/077/OX (072/oj?2070 (072-
do77272^r2, ^222.2 ooFF^o/F/r d/, do ^220 ro7F^ e/i7/2 //o?/ 2///20/20, A. ro7F/^/07F/^//i I de272-
^erro^/d^/e/i/e/eA-d/y, Probatur ex ulterioribus rationibus sequentibus, tum
quod prxscriptio vicennatis ipso Jure tollat obligationem ex delidsis ac parum re-
ferat : an reus jam fuerit punitus, an vero prxicriptio vicennaiis intervenerit?
quiasatisfadiocriminis &pradcriptio pari passu ambulant, Z.iy §.6- de 272/22;'+
7^^o//^y&Mi7y//^ Tum quod Judex ex officio pro
rei defensione laborare &defcdfum partis supplere debeat, Z./2 72072 de^-
72/y, A.! do ^2^/207?. ^22^072^,^222/0772o/Zod.Z^2/0772odocy ^22.272do/22dox. P/222077722-
^72/2y 272 C^^'e722e77yN. !q, de^re/yd^ Quippe cum publice intersit innocentes de-
fendi, L,ye7YW722T§ ^//MeedePw//r^. &tutiushcnocentem absblvere, quam
innocentem condemnare, Z. ^72^772^^- dep%-72/y. Tum denique, quod in cri-
minalibus facilius defeniiones do exceptiones admittantur tam a Judice, quam ab
aliis extraneis, argumento Z* !8+ §^9.^ de^//^e/?. Z 6.^.de^pe/Zs, Z, q.Zod^
do 222/22^, Z*i2Z^d^d^Z.Zor72.do/j^ Quibus nihil refragatur, quod Judex ex-
ceptiones a reo omihas non debeat supplere; etsi enim hoc regulariter conceda-
tur, secus tamen res se habet in exceptionibus, qu/e favorem & defensionem iei
concernunt, & Judici ex adispersjicdatsunt, quippe ubi de innocentia acdefen-
sioneahcuius probanda agitur, multa permittuntur, qua? alias non permitteren-
tur, ^poZ.dovW^ydAy^d Z,L^yi^/y//Zro 272 pn72s/p*N*98 ^/0^^^^
y/2^/?2072, ((s 272 p7*^s//C* (77 777272^/2 ^* 0/7p07V22720 A', y. ^^d/T^y Z/22/, //Z I. dop^Z.
Z^ i^* FV. 22. Pratterea&innocentesabsolvipubliceinteresf, atque, qu^e
publicam causam attingunt, judex ex officio supplere debet, Z^r/od/y Cs D, *d
A. dc d.7 77272 0 272/o(/o, Z/2720r7722/^?222y 222 FV, do^((2yd^*
QUESTIO II
An praescriptio vicennaiis in foro Saxonico quoad crimi-
nalia locum obtineat 2
^.Dubium
Judici facultatem competere poenas Jure definitas juRa ex causa minuere & miti-
gare, id quod hodiernis moribus certo certius esf pracficx quotidiana tam fori
Bocmici,quam5axonici hoc comprobantis*
3+ His itaque pnemisfis relpondemus ad quxsfionem propositam: quod
judex posht in deti&is notoriis,& per delinquentem confessatis non opposita prx-
scriptione hanc exceptionem ex officio attendere, ita, ut licet reus delidfum con-
fcsfis fuerit, tamen si ex adis appareat punitionem essepraescriptam, talis con-
Mho non noceat conhtenti; ita Probor, 272 pr,?x2 ^2772222^/2 /zZh i+
i o. /V. M. Zdiyp o&z/y & 272pr.iA (77777272. §. N. IO, ^ 272 Z*/272.
77.2.^ do ///d/r, 222 L< i, §, 6$)^ ^ do
/2P. 1, (072(/. N* 1,^ ^ co/F^ qgLN* g. ^dC^, /272, & do/(g. ubi
dicit: y 2/od /2772.7/0^0222772 o/Z 720/0^222777, ^772072 Z^/22772 /2/ /0772p/2y d.?//^72 %d 272^72ro72da772,
Ox/o7772j/?.72'2//2, ^^Ty/o^rOF/yOOFT/s^O^F/s 772^/^202^2772 , 72O72j7O/077/OX (072/oj?2070 (072-
do77272^r2, ^222.2 ooFF^o/F/r d/, do ^220 ro7F^ e/i7/2 //o?/ 2///20/20, A. ro7F/^/07F/^//i I de272-
^erro^/d^/e/i/e/eA-d/y, Probatur ex ulterioribus rationibus sequentibus, tum
quod prxscriptio vicennatis ipso Jure tollat obligationem ex delidsis ac parum re-
ferat : an reus jam fuerit punitus, an vero prxicriptio vicennaiis intervenerit?
quiasatisfadiocriminis &pradcriptio pari passu ambulant, Z.iy §.6- de 272/22;'+
7^^o//^y&Mi7y//^ Tum quod Judex ex officio pro
rei defensione laborare &defcdfum partis supplere debeat, Z./2 72072 de^-
72/y, A.! do ^2^/207?. ^22^072^,^222/0772o/Zod.Z^2/0772odocy ^22.272do/22dox. P/222077722-
^72/2y 272 C^^'e722e77yN. !q, de^re/yd^ Quippe cum publice intersit innocentes de-
fendi, L,ye7YW722T§ ^//MeedePw//r^. &tutiushcnocentem absblvere, quam
innocentem condemnare, Z. ^72^772^^- dep%-72/y. Tum denique, quod in cri-
minalibus facilius defeniiones do exceptiones admittantur tam a Judice, quam ab
aliis extraneis, argumento Z* !8+ §^9.^ de^//^e/?. Z 6.^.de^pe/Zs, Z, q.Zod^
do 222/22^, Z*i2Z^d^d^Z.Zor72.do/j^ Quibus nihil refragatur, quod Judex ex-
ceptiones a reo omihas non debeat supplere; etsi enim hoc regulariter conceda-
tur, secus tamen res se habet in exceptionibus, qu/e favorem & defensionem iei
concernunt, & Judici ex adispersjicdatsunt, quippe ubi de innocentia acdefen-
sioneahcuius probanda agitur, multa permittuntur, qua? alias non permitteren-
tur, ^poZ.dovW^ydAy^d Z,L^yi^/y//Zro 272 pn72s/p*N*98 ^/0^^^^
y/2^/?2072, ((s 272 p7*^s//C* (77 777272^/2 ^* 0/7p07V22720 A', y. ^^d/T^y Z/22/, //Z I. dop^Z.
Z^ i^* FV. 22. Pratterea&innocentesabsolvipubliceinteresf, atque, qu^e
publicam causam attingunt, judex ex officio supplere debet, Z^r/od/y Cs D, *d
A. dc d.7 77272 0 272/o(/o, Z/2720r7722/^?222y 222 FV, do^((2yd^*
QUESTIO II
An praescriptio vicennaiis in foro Saxonico quoad crimi-
nalia locum obtineat 2
^.Dubium