Universitätsbibliothek HeidelbergUniversitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Metadaten

Clarke, Richard [Editor]
The regulations of the government of Fort William in Bengal in force at the end of 1853 - to which are added, the acts of the government of India in force in that presidency: with lists of titles and an index (2): Regulations from 1806 to 1834 — London, 1854

DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.34368#0897
Overview
Facsimile
0.5
1 cm
facsimile
Scroll
OCR fulltext
A.D. 1830.]

REGULATION VI.

887

III. [Cultivators failing to fulfil engagements, liable to imprisonment.]
'—Ay XU/. 1835.
IV. Persons wilfully damaging or causing to be damaged indigo plant,
by allowing cattle to trespass thereon, or by any other means, shall, on the
complaint of the ryot to whom the crop may belong, or of the manufac-
turer by whom advances may have been made for the cultivation and
delivery of the said plant, be liable, on proof of the offence, to such
punishment by fine and imprisonment as the magistrate is competent to
inflict under Section XIX. Regulation IX. 1807, due regard being had to
the nature of the case, and the circumstances in life of the offender.
V. Amsh Any person who, having received advances under a written
agreement for the cultivation of indigo, shall be desirous, on the expiration
of the period of his contract, to settle his account, shall be at liberty, in
the event of the proprietor of the factory, or the person acting in his
behalf, refusing to settle the same, to present a petition to the Zillah
Court; and the judge, after a summary inquiry, in the presence of the
parties or their authorized agents, into the merits of the case, shall, on
proof of the expiration of the contract, and of there being no balance due
from the petitioner, or if the petitioner shall deposit in court the amount
of any balance that may be adjudged to be due from him, grant the said
petitioner a release from his engagement, and shall pay over the amount
of any balance that may be deposited by him to the proprietor, or to the
person acting in his behalf.
If the proprietor or person aforesaid shall refuse to receive the
balance awarded to him by the summary process above provided, the judge
shall return the amount to the petitioner, leaving the defendant to seek
his remedy by a regular suit.

A.D. 1830. REGULATION VI.
A REGULATION ^07* 7720^2(2/27?^ ^Ao 6Vo27M?0?2.y of ^A<? 77c2/22Ao6oT2^ 72020 272
A07T6 7'c/o/*2-7?g ^0 ?Ac X22^2.^C72CO-^l^020727200 ^oDeAfO?'^ 6'0??/Z72(V 272 fAg 6*22727
GTxoAy 272 J%70C22f2072 q/" ZLATAS' ; PASSED A?/ 2*Ac G*02707V20r-6r07207Tx/ 272
C02272C2/, o?2 i!A<? 12^A ^22^22^^, 1830.
I. IT being deemed expedient to provide more effectually for the sub-
sistence of debtors confined in gaol in execution of decrees or other civil
process, under Section VIII. Regulation IV. of 1793, and other provisions
of Regulations in force, the following rules are hereby enacted, to be in
force from the date of their promulgation throughout the territories sub-
ject to the presidency of Fort William.
II. In modification of such parts of Section VIII. Regulation IV. 1793,
extended to Benares by Section II. Regulation VIII. 1795, and re-enacted



The judge to hold a
summary inquiry.
factory.
The judge how to
proceed if the pro-
prietor objects to re-
ceive the balance.

Reg. VI. 1830.

Preamble.

Part of Sec. viii.
Reg. IV. 1793, ex-
tended to Benares by
 
Annotationen