DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.796#0389
NOTES
34i
of determining the type of this image of
Earth praying for rain.
196. Cf. Michaelis, A.M. i. 304; Winter,
fahrb. d. k. d. a?rk. Inst. ix. (Arch. Anzeig.),
P- 43-
197. C.I.A. iii. 63.
198. Deutsche Bauzeitimg, 18S4.
199. Cf. Michaelis, A.M. ii. 5; Jahrb.
d. k. d.. Arch. Inst. viii. (1893), p. 119.
200. Cf. Murray, Greek Sculpture, i.
p. 181; Coliignon, Hist, de la Sculpt.
Grec. i. p. 337.
201. Cf. Dorpfeld, A.M. xii. 51.
202. C.I.A. ii. 1378-1385, 1390-1393;
iii. 887, 916-918.
203. C.I.A. ii. 1377, 1386, 1392b.
204. Benndorf, A.M. i. 48, believes that
a. round base of Pentelic marble which now
stands west of the Parthenon, may have
supported the statue of Lysimache. This
base is about a foot high and two feet wide,
and shows on its upper surface the print of
a left foot. A mutilated inscription {C./.A.
ii. 1376) warrants the belief that the statue
represented a priestess of Athena.
205. Cf. C. H. Weller, "The Pre-
Periclean Vropylon," A.J.A. second series,
viii. 35. See also Hitzig-Bliimner, Pausan.
i. p. 304; Michaelis, A.M. ii. 95; Walter
Miller, A.J. A. viii. 1893, 5°3-
206. Furtwangler, Masterpieces, p. 9,
places the statues of Pericles and of the
Lemnian Athena outside of the Propylaea,
a little to the north of the principal avenue
which ran from the Propylaea eastward.
But see Weizsacker, Neue Jahrb. f. Philol.
133 (18S6), p. i. ; Hauvette, Herod, p. 47;
Judeich, Topogr. p. 216.
207. Cf. Furtwangler, Masterpieces, p.
10. Weighty reasons for rejecting the
view of Furtwangler are given by P. Jamot,
a summary of which is found in Frazer,
Pausan. v. p. 514.
208. The Capucins in their plan of
Athens, 1669, speak of the Parthenon as
•dedicated to St. Sophia, while the Jesuit
Babin in 1672 refers to it as the temple
•of la Sagesse Eternelle. This shows that a
tradition had grown up connecting Athena's
temple with St. Sophia. Cf. Strygowski,
A.M. xiv. 270.
209. C. Bdtticher, Untersuckungen auf
der Akropolis von Athen, p. 159, speaks
of finding a cornice block of the east pedi-
ment built into the apse. From this it
appears that the roof was broken by the
construction of the apse.
210. Cf. F. von Duhn, A.M. ii. 38.
211. Cf. Gregorovius, Geschichte der
Stadt Athen, ii. p. 311.
212. R. Bohn, Die Propylaeen, p. 7>
attributes the building of this tower to the
Turks. Herzberg, Athen, pp. 102 and
226, ascribes it to the Burgundian dukes.
213. Burnouf, La Ville et I'Acropole
d'Athenes, p. 85, places these walls in
the Turkish period.
214. For this period and the next the
work of de Laborde, Athines aux 15, 16
et 17 Siecles, is invaluable.
215. Cf. Judeich, A.M. xxii. 423 ;
Wachsmuth, Die Stadt Athen, i. Anhang,
for early accounts of the ruins and relics
of ancient Athens.
216. Cf. Michaelis, Parthenon Atlas,
Plates IV., VII., XIII., XIV. for repro-
duction of these drawings.
217. J. R. Wheeler, Class. Review, xv.
430, makes out a good case in favor of
this occurrence having taken place some
ten years earlier.
218. This letter is published in Wachs-
muth, Die Stadt Athen, i. p. 745. The
collection of references in the ancient
writers to the Parthenon made by Meur-
sius (Cecropia) is of great value. Cf.
Wachsmuth, I.e. i. p. 64.
219. For the errors and omissions in
Carrey's drawings see Michaelis, der Par-
thenon, p. 102. These drawings are kept
in the Cabinet des Estampes of the National
Library in Paris. In V Acadimie des In-
criptions, 1900, p. 262, M. Babelon calls
attention to the fact that Albert Vaudal
in his L'Odyssie d'nn Ambassadeur (1670-
1680) expresses the opinion that the draw-
ings made for the Marquis de Nointel are
the work of an unknown Flemish artist
34i
of determining the type of this image of
Earth praying for rain.
196. Cf. Michaelis, A.M. i. 304; Winter,
fahrb. d. k. d. a?rk. Inst. ix. (Arch. Anzeig.),
P- 43-
197. C.I.A. iii. 63.
198. Deutsche Bauzeitimg, 18S4.
199. Cf. Michaelis, A.M. ii. 5; Jahrb.
d. k. d.. Arch. Inst. viii. (1893), p. 119.
200. Cf. Murray, Greek Sculpture, i.
p. 181; Coliignon, Hist, de la Sculpt.
Grec. i. p. 337.
201. Cf. Dorpfeld, A.M. xii. 51.
202. C.I.A. ii. 1378-1385, 1390-1393;
iii. 887, 916-918.
203. C.I.A. ii. 1377, 1386, 1392b.
204. Benndorf, A.M. i. 48, believes that
a. round base of Pentelic marble which now
stands west of the Parthenon, may have
supported the statue of Lysimache. This
base is about a foot high and two feet wide,
and shows on its upper surface the print of
a left foot. A mutilated inscription {C./.A.
ii. 1376) warrants the belief that the statue
represented a priestess of Athena.
205. Cf. C. H. Weller, "The Pre-
Periclean Vropylon," A.J.A. second series,
viii. 35. See also Hitzig-Bliimner, Pausan.
i. p. 304; Michaelis, A.M. ii. 95; Walter
Miller, A.J. A. viii. 1893, 5°3-
206. Furtwangler, Masterpieces, p. 9,
places the statues of Pericles and of the
Lemnian Athena outside of the Propylaea,
a little to the north of the principal avenue
which ran from the Propylaea eastward.
But see Weizsacker, Neue Jahrb. f. Philol.
133 (18S6), p. i. ; Hauvette, Herod, p. 47;
Judeich, Topogr. p. 216.
207. Cf. Furtwangler, Masterpieces, p.
10. Weighty reasons for rejecting the
view of Furtwangler are given by P. Jamot,
a summary of which is found in Frazer,
Pausan. v. p. 514.
208. The Capucins in their plan of
Athens, 1669, speak of the Parthenon as
•dedicated to St. Sophia, while the Jesuit
Babin in 1672 refers to it as the temple
•of la Sagesse Eternelle. This shows that a
tradition had grown up connecting Athena's
temple with St. Sophia. Cf. Strygowski,
A.M. xiv. 270.
209. C. Bdtticher, Untersuckungen auf
der Akropolis von Athen, p. 159, speaks
of finding a cornice block of the east pedi-
ment built into the apse. From this it
appears that the roof was broken by the
construction of the apse.
210. Cf. F. von Duhn, A.M. ii. 38.
211. Cf. Gregorovius, Geschichte der
Stadt Athen, ii. p. 311.
212. R. Bohn, Die Propylaeen, p. 7>
attributes the building of this tower to the
Turks. Herzberg, Athen, pp. 102 and
226, ascribes it to the Burgundian dukes.
213. Burnouf, La Ville et I'Acropole
d'Athenes, p. 85, places these walls in
the Turkish period.
214. For this period and the next the
work of de Laborde, Athines aux 15, 16
et 17 Siecles, is invaluable.
215. Cf. Judeich, A.M. xxii. 423 ;
Wachsmuth, Die Stadt Athen, i. Anhang,
for early accounts of the ruins and relics
of ancient Athens.
216. Cf. Michaelis, Parthenon Atlas,
Plates IV., VII., XIII., XIV. for repro-
duction of these drawings.
217. J. R. Wheeler, Class. Review, xv.
430, makes out a good case in favor of
this occurrence having taken place some
ten years earlier.
218. This letter is published in Wachs-
muth, Die Stadt Athen, i. p. 745. The
collection of references in the ancient
writers to the Parthenon made by Meur-
sius (Cecropia) is of great value. Cf.
Wachsmuth, I.e. i. p. 64.
219. For the errors and omissions in
Carrey's drawings see Michaelis, der Par-
thenon, p. 102. These drawings are kept
in the Cabinet des Estampes of the National
Library in Paris. In V Acadimie des In-
criptions, 1900, p. 262, M. Babelon calls
attention to the fact that Albert Vaudal
in his L'Odyssie d'nn Ambassadeur (1670-
1680) expresses the opinion that the draw-
ings made for the Marquis de Nointel are
the work of an unknown Flemish artist