APPENDIX.
453
the dated sepulchral tablets of the bull Apis at the serapeum, the
lists of kings at Sakkarali, Thebes and Abydus, the chronological
canon of the Turin papyrus, and other incidental notices. But of
the anterior dynasties no certain chronological dates are afforded by
the monuments, those hitherto proposed not having stood the test of
historical or philological criticism."—S. Birch, LL.D.: "Guide
to the First and Second Egyptian Rooms at the Brit. Museum." 1874,
p. 10.
As some indication of the wide divergence of opinion upon this
subject, it is enough to point out that the German Egyptologists
alone differ as to the date of Menes or Mena (the first authentic king
of the ancient empire), to the following extent:
B. C.
BOKCKir places Mena in 5702
Unger places Mena in ... 5013
BitUGSCH places Mena in 4455
Latjtii places Mena in ... 4157
LEt'Sius places Mena in ... 3892
Buksen places Mena in ... 3G23
Mariette, though recognizing the need for extreme caution in the
acceptance or rejection of any of these calculations, inclined on the
whole to abide by the lists of Manetho; according to which the thirty-
four recorded dynasties would stand as follows:
ANCIENT EMPIRE.
DYNASTIES. CAPITALS.
n.'lThis • • • •
m.
IV.} Memphis .
V.)
VI. Elephantine .
Yin [ Memphis .
y' [■ Heracleopolis
B. c.
(5004
]4751
4449
J 4285
(3951
3703
3500
(3358
13240
MIDDLE EMPIRE.
XI.)
xii. y TL
Thebes
X11I.)
XIV. Xoi's . . . .
XV.)
XVI. - Shepherd Kings .
XVII.
(3064
- 3004
(2851
2398
2214
NEW EMPIRE.
DTNASTIES.
CAPITALS.
B. c.
XVIII.)
(1703
-H463
(1288
XIX.
Thebes .
XX.
XXI.'
Tanis
1110
XXII.
Bubastis
980
XXIII.
Tanis
810
XXIV.
Sai's .
721
XXV.
(Ethiopians) .
715
XXVI.
Sal's .
605
XXVII:
(Persians)
527
XXVIII.
Sai's . . .
405
XXIX.
Mendes .
399
XXX.
Sebennytis .
378
XXXI.
(Persians)
340
LOWER EMPIRE.
XXXII.
Macedonians
332
XXXIII.
((i reeks) .
305
XXXIV.
(Romans)
30
To this chronology may be opposed the brief table of dates com-
piled by M. Chabas. This table represents what may be called the
medium school of Egyptian chronology, and is offered by M. Chabas,
"not as an attempt to reconcile systems," but as an aid to the classi-
fication of certain broadly indicated epochs.
453
the dated sepulchral tablets of the bull Apis at the serapeum, the
lists of kings at Sakkarali, Thebes and Abydus, the chronological
canon of the Turin papyrus, and other incidental notices. But of
the anterior dynasties no certain chronological dates are afforded by
the monuments, those hitherto proposed not having stood the test of
historical or philological criticism."—S. Birch, LL.D.: "Guide
to the First and Second Egyptian Rooms at the Brit. Museum." 1874,
p. 10.
As some indication of the wide divergence of opinion upon this
subject, it is enough to point out that the German Egyptologists
alone differ as to the date of Menes or Mena (the first authentic king
of the ancient empire), to the following extent:
B. C.
BOKCKir places Mena in 5702
Unger places Mena in ... 5013
BitUGSCH places Mena in 4455
Latjtii places Mena in ... 4157
LEt'Sius places Mena in ... 3892
Buksen places Mena in ... 3G23
Mariette, though recognizing the need for extreme caution in the
acceptance or rejection of any of these calculations, inclined on the
whole to abide by the lists of Manetho; according to which the thirty-
four recorded dynasties would stand as follows:
ANCIENT EMPIRE.
DYNASTIES. CAPITALS.
n.'lThis • • • •
m.
IV.} Memphis .
V.)
VI. Elephantine .
Yin [ Memphis .
y' [■ Heracleopolis
B. c.
(5004
]4751
4449
J 4285
(3951
3703
3500
(3358
13240
MIDDLE EMPIRE.
XI.)
xii. y TL
Thebes
X11I.)
XIV. Xoi's . . . .
XV.)
XVI. - Shepherd Kings .
XVII.
(3064
- 3004
(2851
2398
2214
NEW EMPIRE.
DTNASTIES.
CAPITALS.
B. c.
XVIII.)
(1703
-H463
(1288
XIX.
Thebes .
XX.
XXI.'
Tanis
1110
XXII.
Bubastis
980
XXIII.
Tanis
810
XXIV.
Sai's .
721
XXV.
(Ethiopians) .
715
XXVI.
Sal's .
605
XXVII:
(Persians)
527
XXVIII.
Sai's . . .
405
XXIX.
Mendes .
399
XXX.
Sebennytis .
378
XXXI.
(Persians)
340
LOWER EMPIRE.
XXXII.
Macedonians
332
XXXIII.
((i reeks) .
305
XXXIV.
(Romans)
30
To this chronology may be opposed the brief table of dates com-
piled by M. Chabas. This table represents what may be called the
medium school of Egyptian chronology, and is offered by M. Chabas,
"not as an attempt to reconcile systems," but as an aid to the classi-
fication of certain broadly indicated epochs.