DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.9552#0713
index.
189
NITARIAN Society of
Calcutta—
the condition of, ii. 350.
UNITARIANS—
their worship why pre-
ferred, i. 287 to 290.
Ram Mohun Roy's sym-
pathy with them, i. 300.
UNITY OF GOD. (See
God.)
PANISHAD. (See Mun-
dakopanishad, Ccnopa-
n is had, Ka th op an is had,
Ishopanishad, Rites, Bur-
ning of widows.)
VEDAS-
all prove the unity of
God, i. 12.
defence of the Mono-
theistical system, i. 147
to 180.
do not consider rites ex-
cellent, ii. 1^ to 157.
VEDANTA—(See Educa-
tion, Maya.)
abridgment of the—, i.
1 to 24.
explains why the Vedas
call space and other
things God, i .12.
Pantheism distinguished
from Vedantism, i. 96,
175, 176.
attacked, i. 211.
vindicated i. 214 to 216.
its doctrines explained, i.
257 to 265.
similes of, explained, i.
218.
attributes of God, i. 261.
not atheistic, hi. Pt. 1 :
, in.
ignorance of the real na-
ture of God declared by
the scriptures, as well as
by the—, hi. Pt. 1 ; 112.
worship of Supreme Be-
ing practicable accord-
ing to, nay obligatory,
i- 175-
VICARIOUS SACRI-
FICE. (See Atonement.)
VIRGIN—
in Old Testament did not
refer to Mary, hi. Pt. 1 :
229 to 233 ; Pt. 2 : 122,
123, 124, 125.
mis-translation of Isaiah
XXIII. 12, hi. Pt.2: 125.
VISHNU. ( See Burning
of ividozvs, Mother.)
VRIHASPATI. ( See Mo-
ther, ^Daughter. )
VYASH—( See Mother. )
worship according to, i.
294, 295.
WAGES—
rate of—of the peasantry
and labourers in India,
ii- 93-
WARE, Kev. Henrv—
letter to, iii. Pt. 3 : 106
to 122.
his letter to Ram Mohun
Roy, iii. Pt. 3 : 107, 108.
WIDOWS—( See Burning
of widows. )
their miserable condition,
ii. 200, 201.
Manu on the duties of
widows, 127, 132.
Yajnavalkya on ditto, ii.
127.
189
NITARIAN Society of
Calcutta—
the condition of, ii. 350.
UNITARIANS—
their worship why pre-
ferred, i. 287 to 290.
Ram Mohun Roy's sym-
pathy with them, i. 300.
UNITY OF GOD. (See
God.)
PANISHAD. (See Mun-
dakopanishad, Ccnopa-
n is had, Ka th op an is had,
Ishopanishad, Rites, Bur-
ning of widows.)
VEDAS-
all prove the unity of
God, i. 12.
defence of the Mono-
theistical system, i. 147
to 180.
do not consider rites ex-
cellent, ii. 1^ to 157.
VEDANTA—(See Educa-
tion, Maya.)
abridgment of the—, i.
1 to 24.
explains why the Vedas
call space and other
things God, i .12.
Pantheism distinguished
from Vedantism, i. 96,
175, 176.
attacked, i. 211.
vindicated i. 214 to 216.
its doctrines explained, i.
257 to 265.
similes of, explained, i.
218.
attributes of God, i. 261.
not atheistic, hi. Pt. 1 :
, in.
ignorance of the real na-
ture of God declared by
the scriptures, as well as
by the—, hi. Pt. 1 ; 112.
worship of Supreme Be-
ing practicable accord-
ing to, nay obligatory,
i- 175-
VICARIOUS SACRI-
FICE. (See Atonement.)
VIRGIN—
in Old Testament did not
refer to Mary, hi. Pt. 1 :
229 to 233 ; Pt. 2 : 122,
123, 124, 125.
mis-translation of Isaiah
XXIII. 12, hi. Pt.2: 125.
VISHNU. ( See Burning
of ividozvs, Mother.)
VRIHASPATI. ( See Mo-
ther, ^Daughter. )
VYASH—( See Mother. )
worship according to, i.
294, 295.
WAGES—
rate of—of the peasantry
and labourers in India,
ii- 93-
WARE, Kev. Henrv—
letter to, iii. Pt. 3 : 106
to 122.
his letter to Ram Mohun
Roy, iii. Pt. 3 : 107, 108.
WIDOWS—( See Burning
of widows. )
their miserable condition,
ii. 200, 201.
Manu on the duties of
widows, 127, 132.
Yajnavalkya on ditto, ii.
127.