DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.49347#0404
EUPHRONIOS
Robert in Pauly-Wissowa, s.v. Euphronios.
Klein, pp. 137-149; Euphronios.
Sauer in Thiemes Lexikon, s.v. Euphronios.
Furtwangler in F.R. i, pp. 27-30, 98-109, 110-113; ii,
PP- 133-135. 172-178.
Walters, i, pp. 430-434.
Hartwig, pp. 95-153, 444-5°2·
Buschor, p. 163.
Perrot and Chipiez, x, pp. 390-446.
Radford, JHS. 1915, pp. 107-139.
Beazley, VA. pp. 30-31.
The signatures of Euphronios concerning which there can be
no dispute are eleven in number; a twelfth (1*), a fragmentary
kylix from the Acropolis has merely the inscription IO£ ΕΛΡ
but as the restoration in view of the style to Εύφρό^ιο? eypapev
offers no difficulty it may safely be regarded as a definite signa-
ture. Another Acropolis fragment (2*) has the verb only, but
the style is so distinctly that of Euphronios it would be difficult
to suggest another name. Nos. 3*, 15*, and 30 have the name
only without the verb.
Of the twelve authentic signatures 1*, 7*, 10* and 14* bear
the ’ey paper formula alone and are thus certainly works from the
hand of the master himself; 7* in addition bears the signature
of Chachrylion as potter.
The other eight all have the enoiojaev formula and of these 12*
has in addition the signature of Onesimos (although only the
last four letters of this name are preserved the restoration is now
universally accepted) as painter; and as the style of this differs
from the others it is clear that certainly three different artists
(Euphronios, Onesimos, and a nameless painter) were at work in
the same factory.
As several of the seven ^oipaer vases and a large number of
unsigned vases were clearly by the same hand and had in addi-
tion the name Panaitios, Furtwangler christened this anonymous
E 376 2
Robert in Pauly-Wissowa, s.v. Euphronios.
Klein, pp. 137-149; Euphronios.
Sauer in Thiemes Lexikon, s.v. Euphronios.
Furtwangler in F.R. i, pp. 27-30, 98-109, 110-113; ii,
PP- 133-135. 172-178.
Walters, i, pp. 430-434.
Hartwig, pp. 95-153, 444-5°2·
Buschor, p. 163.
Perrot and Chipiez, x, pp. 390-446.
Radford, JHS. 1915, pp. 107-139.
Beazley, VA. pp. 30-31.
The signatures of Euphronios concerning which there can be
no dispute are eleven in number; a twelfth (1*), a fragmentary
kylix from the Acropolis has merely the inscription IO£ ΕΛΡ
but as the restoration in view of the style to Εύφρό^ιο? eypapev
offers no difficulty it may safely be regarded as a definite signa-
ture. Another Acropolis fragment (2*) has the verb only, but
the style is so distinctly that of Euphronios it would be difficult
to suggest another name. Nos. 3*, 15*, and 30 have the name
only without the verb.
Of the twelve authentic signatures 1*, 7*, 10* and 14* bear
the ’ey paper formula alone and are thus certainly works from the
hand of the master himself; 7* in addition bears the signature
of Chachrylion as potter.
The other eight all have the enoiojaev formula and of these 12*
has in addition the signature of Onesimos (although only the
last four letters of this name are preserved the restoration is now
universally accepted) as painter; and as the style of this differs
from the others it is clear that certainly three different artists
(Euphronios, Onesimos, and a nameless painter) were at work in
the same factory.
As several of the seven ^oipaer vases and a large number of
unsigned vases were clearly by the same hand and had in addi-
tion the name Panaitios, Furtwangler christened this anonymous
E 376 2