Louvre; on the other hand’, he connects the shape of the
draperies and the general attitude with the Virgin in the
Mathys collection (exhibited in Bruges in 1902, n° 28) and now
in the collection of Mr. Martin Ryerson at Chicago. As for
the Child, except for' a few differences, it comes from the
Madonna of St. Luke, the head however is not so big, the
body is less stiff, and the legs more closely together. Perhaps
for this part of the painting could we suppose the help of
some clever pupil as is the case in several of Rogier’s works, t——-
$5 This panel adds a very fine work to the catalogue of
Van der Weyden. It shows us all that grace so full of style
and all that gentleness blended with strength which characterised
the work of the Master in his last period. This enables to
see mote clearly from whence Memling will proceed, t-1-
SUMMARY BIBLIOGRAPHY
jJ Hulin de Loo (G.): Diptyclis by Rogier Van der Weyden. (Burlington
Magazine, t. 44, April 1924, p. 185-189). t——r-;--t—■—-1-—t-
$5 Friedlander (Max /.) : Die Altniederl'dndische Malerei, t. II, Berlin, 1924,
draperies and the general attitude with the Virgin in the
Mathys collection (exhibited in Bruges in 1902, n° 28) and now
in the collection of Mr. Martin Ryerson at Chicago. As for
the Child, except for' a few differences, it comes from the
Madonna of St. Luke, the head however is not so big, the
body is less stiff, and the legs more closely together. Perhaps
for this part of the painting could we suppose the help of
some clever pupil as is the case in several of Rogier’s works, t——-
$5 This panel adds a very fine work to the catalogue of
Van der Weyden. It shows us all that grace so full of style
and all that gentleness blended with strength which characterised
the work of the Master in his last period. This enables to
see mote clearly from whence Memling will proceed, t-1-
SUMMARY BIBLIOGRAPHY
jJ Hulin de Loo (G.): Diptyclis by Rogier Van der Weyden. (Burlington
Magazine, t. 44, April 1924, p. 185-189). t——r-;--t—■—-1-—t-
$5 Friedlander (Max /.) : Die Altniederl'dndische Malerei, t. II, Berlin, 1924,