DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.47325#0389
386
Leonid A. Beliaev
Foo mo ies
1 Betin L. V, Sheredega V. I. Altarnaia pregrada Rozhdestvenskogo sobora Savvino-
Storozhevskogo monastyria // Restavratsiia i issledovaniia pamiatnikov kul’tury M., 1982.
T. 2. S. 31-44.
2 Chukova T. A. Altarnye pregrady v drevnerusskom zodchestve 10 — nachala 13 vv. //
Problemy arkheologii i periodizatsii v arkheologii. L. 1991. S. 115-120; Idem. Altarnye pre-
grady v zodchestve domongoPskoi Rusi // Liturgiia. arkhitektura i iskusstvo vizantiiskogo
mira. St. Petersburg, 1995. S. 273-287.
3 Beliaev L. A. Drevnie monastyri Moskvy po dannym arkheologii. M., 1994. S. 65-70,
II. 14. 32-6, 38; Idem. Bogoiavlenie kamennoe: Arkhitekturno-arkhiologicheskie izyskaniia v
sobore Bogoiavlenskogo monastyria v Kitai-gorode // Restavratsiia i arkhitekturnaia arkhe-
ologiia: Novyie materialy i issledovaniia. M., 1991. S. 36-55.
4 “The altar screen (0.8-0.85 tn) is based on a broad limestone podium (1.4 m) extending
for 0.55 m to the west. The remains of this altar screen can be seen over the podium until the
present. The surface of the altar screen establishes the same plane with the surfaces of the
western sides of the eastern pillars. Before the northeastern pillar there are several stones
stuck by lime-mortar, which might be the remains of architectural decoration of an attar
screen section. The traces of three entrances to the altar are very vague. The most definite is
the central entrance, “The Tsar’s Doors’’, which is about 1 m in width. The entrance to the
prothesis, 0,8 m in width, was, probably, set nearby the northeastern pillar. The entrance to
the diakonnik should be built symmetrical to the latter”. Voronin N. N. Zodchestvo Severo-
Vostochnoi Rusi XII-XV vv. M.; L. 1962. S. 379. Compare II. 183, 186.
5 Betin L. V, Sheredega V. I. Op. cit. P. 31-44.
6 Ognev B. A. Uspenskii sobor v Zvenigorode na Gorodke // MIA. 1955. № 44. II. 2.
7 Beliaev L. A. Drevnie monastyri Moskvy po dannym arkheologii. M., 1994. P. 163-166.
II. 125. 127 .
8 We should note that О. M. loannisian gives another interpretation of this structure. He
considers it as the remains of the wall of a very small chamber inside the prothesis. I am tak-
ing the opportunity to express my gratitude to Oleg loannisian for the possibility to get
acquainted with his dispoveries during his excavations in Rostov Velikii in 1991-1995.
9 Teteriatnikov N. B. The Liturgical Planning of Byzantine Churches in Cappadocia. Roma,
1996.
Leonid A. Beliaev
Foo mo ies
1 Betin L. V, Sheredega V. I. Altarnaia pregrada Rozhdestvenskogo sobora Savvino-
Storozhevskogo monastyria // Restavratsiia i issledovaniia pamiatnikov kul’tury M., 1982.
T. 2. S. 31-44.
2 Chukova T. A. Altarnye pregrady v drevnerusskom zodchestve 10 — nachala 13 vv. //
Problemy arkheologii i periodizatsii v arkheologii. L. 1991. S. 115-120; Idem. Altarnye pre-
grady v zodchestve domongoPskoi Rusi // Liturgiia. arkhitektura i iskusstvo vizantiiskogo
mira. St. Petersburg, 1995. S. 273-287.
3 Beliaev L. A. Drevnie monastyri Moskvy po dannym arkheologii. M., 1994. S. 65-70,
II. 14. 32-6, 38; Idem. Bogoiavlenie kamennoe: Arkhitekturno-arkhiologicheskie izyskaniia v
sobore Bogoiavlenskogo monastyria v Kitai-gorode // Restavratsiia i arkhitekturnaia arkhe-
ologiia: Novyie materialy i issledovaniia. M., 1991. S. 36-55.
4 “The altar screen (0.8-0.85 tn) is based on a broad limestone podium (1.4 m) extending
for 0.55 m to the west. The remains of this altar screen can be seen over the podium until the
present. The surface of the altar screen establishes the same plane with the surfaces of the
western sides of the eastern pillars. Before the northeastern pillar there are several stones
stuck by lime-mortar, which might be the remains of architectural decoration of an attar
screen section. The traces of three entrances to the altar are very vague. The most definite is
the central entrance, “The Tsar’s Doors’’, which is about 1 m in width. The entrance to the
prothesis, 0,8 m in width, was, probably, set nearby the northeastern pillar. The entrance to
the diakonnik should be built symmetrical to the latter”. Voronin N. N. Zodchestvo Severo-
Vostochnoi Rusi XII-XV vv. M.; L. 1962. S. 379. Compare II. 183, 186.
5 Betin L. V, Sheredega V. I. Op. cit. P. 31-44.
6 Ognev B. A. Uspenskii sobor v Zvenigorode na Gorodke // MIA. 1955. № 44. II. 2.
7 Beliaev L. A. Drevnie monastyri Moskvy po dannym arkheologii. M., 1994. P. 163-166.
II. 125. 127 .
8 We should note that О. M. loannisian gives another interpretation of this structure. He
considers it as the remains of the wall of a very small chamber inside the prothesis. I am tak-
ing the opportunity to express my gratitude to Oleg loannisian for the possibility to get
acquainted with his dispoveries during his excavations in Rostov Velikii in 1991-1995.
9 Teteriatnikov N. B. The Liturgical Planning of Byzantine Churches in Cappadocia. Roma,
1996.