Universitätsbibliothek HeidelbergUniversitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Metadaten

Perry, Walter Copland
Greek and Roman sculpture: a popular introduction to the history of Greek and Roman sculpture — London, 1882

DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.14144#0237

DWork-Logo
Overview
Facsimile
0.5
1 cm
facsimile
Scroll
OCR fulltext
GENIUS OF PHEIDIAS.

201

accumulated by his predecessors through the long ages of the past,
and was able to use all the resources of art in the embodiment of
ideas which were visible to him alone. We might indeed dwell with
admiration on the extraordinary amount of varied knowledge 1—of
architecture, of form and colour, symmetry and rhythm—which could
alone enable him to do what he did ; or on his wondrous technical
skill in dealing with the most varied materials—gold, ivory, bronze,
marble and ebony; a knowledge and a skill sufficient to make a
thousand reputations. But in all these qualifications, important and
meritorious as they are, he was approached by many, and in some of
them possibly surpassed by his successors. We can only understand the
place which both the ancient and the modern world have assigned to
Pheidias in the Pantheon of Art, by fixing our attention on that one
quality which raises him to the same rank as his country's greatest
poets—his Ideality.

Cicero when speaking of the Olympian Zeus says : ' The great
artist when he was moulding his Jupiter or Minerva was not looking
at any form of these deities of which he might make a copy, but
there dwelt in his mind a certain form (species) of surpassing beauty,
the sight and intense contemplation of which directed his art and
his hand to produce a similitude.'2 Like the ideas of Plato, these
forms or species were not produced, but existed in the reason and
intelligence of man.3 ' Did the Pheidiases and the Praxiteles,' asks
Thcspcsion4 sarcastically, 'ascend into Heaven, and taking an impres-
sion from the forms of the Gods mould them by their art; or was it
something else which guided them in their work ?' ' Something else,'

1 'Sic ego nunc tibi refero artem sine
scientiaesse non posse' (Cicero, AcaJ. Prior.
ii. 47. 146).

• Cic. Oral. ii. 9.

:l Ibid. iii. 10: ' Harum rerum formas
appellat ille non inlelligendi solum sed eliam
dicendi gravissimus auctor et magister
l'lato; easque gigni negat et ait semper esse ac
ratione et intelligentia contineri.'

* Philostratus, Dc Vila Apollonii Tyau.

VL 19 : %\ frilltfw 8f €?1t€ (Qiavitjiuv) KCU oi
Wpa^trtKtis p.wv aytkQuvTts is oitpai'bv Kai
a-Kop.alap.ivoi tc rwv Otuiv (tbrj ri\vvv avra
iirowvvro, Q tnpov ri & i<p'io~rri ai/rovs

rip xAaTTeii': 'irtpov ttpt) ['AwoWwvios) Kal
p.to~rov yt aotp'ias npiiyfia. rroiov tlntv; ou
yap av n napa rr\v fila-qcriy ffnois, (pavrao~lat
t<prj. ravra tipyd<raro aoipwripa fJUfx-fiffews or]-
puovpyos. filfjLrjais p.iv yap /xovov bi]p.iovpyr}o'ti
b (loev, (pavraata Si Ka\ u /xrj doty. vtrodr}o~trat
yap avrb trpbs rrfV ava4>opav rov ovros.
Thespesion argues against the Greek re-
presentations of Gods, &.C. and in favour of
the Egyptian symbolic method : o-otybv yap it
Tip ri Aiywrriwv, Kai rb fijj 6paffvvfa6ai is ra
rvv Stuiv *f5»7, (vp.0o\iKa Si avra iroieiaflai Kai
vTovov^Ltva Kal yap av Kai tripLvoripa ovrw
ipaifotro.
 
Annotationen