CATALOGUE OF SCULPTURE.
325. 13 of Michaelis has been followed. It may be assumed
that a slab (xxvii.) is lost between xxvi. and xxviii.,
which may have included the fragment No. 31:5, 15.
Slab xxx. when complete may have fitted to xxix.; but,
as it has the joint preserved on the right, there can be no
doubt that it did not fit to No. xxxi. Between these two,
therefore, another slab may be supposed to be missing.
The three slabs enumerated as lost, viz. xx., xxvii., and the
Fig. 13.—Slab xxv. re stored from Stuart (from Michaelis).
slab between xxx., xxxi., may be supposed to have been
about 12 feet long. The missing part of xxx. may be 2 feet.
Of the 25 ft. 10 in. of the frieze lost without record 14
feet are thus accounted for; the remaining lift. 10in.
may be due to the loss of two more slabs, containing a
chariot group, or to miscalculated proportions in Carrey's
drawing.
Slab xxviii. is original; slabs xxix.-xxxi. are casts from
325. 13 of Michaelis has been followed. It may be assumed
that a slab (xxvii.) is lost between xxvi. and xxviii.,
which may have included the fragment No. 31:5, 15.
Slab xxx. when complete may have fitted to xxix.; but,
as it has the joint preserved on the right, there can be no
doubt that it did not fit to No. xxxi. Between these two,
therefore, another slab may be supposed to be missing.
The three slabs enumerated as lost, viz. xx., xxvii., and the
Fig. 13.—Slab xxv. re stored from Stuart (from Michaelis).
slab between xxx., xxxi., may be supposed to have been
about 12 feet long. The missing part of xxx. may be 2 feet.
Of the 25 ft. 10 in. of the frieze lost without record 14
feet are thus accounted for; the remaining lift. 10in.
may be due to the loss of two more slabs, containing a
chariot group, or to miscalculated proportions in Carrey's
drawing.
Slab xxviii. is original; slabs xxix.-xxxi. are casts from