16
that I had left London some time previous to the
nomination of the Commissioners, and the issue of
their instructions—before, I believe, it had been
even decided that they were to be limited to two
alternatives; and I was absent seven or eight
months in Scotland ; only returning to England
just before the judgment was given. As to Sir
Robert Smirke's plan, which was also Gothic, I
never saw it,—and it therefore could not lead me to
take a similar impression; besides, I took for
granted then, that the superior powers were to de-
cide, and that we had only to look on, and pay the
bill. As to the arch, you will say, perhaps, it is a
prejudice—but though most useful for mechanical
purposes, I am very much inclined to think that in
exterior structure and decoration you are as well
without it, and it has certainly led to many enor-
mities. On the subject of imitation on one side,
and original conceptions on the other, I know not
exactly what to say. We have had a long trial
since the revival of the arts, of attempts at origin-
ality, and of copying from bad models. You are a
better judge than I am, how either has succeeded;
but we never have yet had, as far as I know, in
Western Europe, a real copy of what all acknow-
ledge to have been perfect in its kind. There is a
good beginning on the Calton Hill. I am willing
to believe that one such copy, on an appropriate
scale, although a copy, would go far, very far, to
create an original taste amongst us — that is to
that I had left London some time previous to the
nomination of the Commissioners, and the issue of
their instructions—before, I believe, it had been
even decided that they were to be limited to two
alternatives; and I was absent seven or eight
months in Scotland ; only returning to England
just before the judgment was given. As to Sir
Robert Smirke's plan, which was also Gothic, I
never saw it,—and it therefore could not lead me to
take a similar impression; besides, I took for
granted then, that the superior powers were to de-
cide, and that we had only to look on, and pay the
bill. As to the arch, you will say, perhaps, it is a
prejudice—but though most useful for mechanical
purposes, I am very much inclined to think that in
exterior structure and decoration you are as well
without it, and it has certainly led to many enor-
mities. On the subject of imitation on one side,
and original conceptions on the other, I know not
exactly what to say. We have had a long trial
since the revival of the arts, of attempts at origin-
ality, and of copying from bad models. You are a
better judge than I am, how either has succeeded;
but we never have yet had, as far as I know, in
Western Europe, a real copy of what all acknow-
ledge to have been perfect in its kind. There is a
good beginning on the Calton Hill. I am willing
to believe that one such copy, on an appropriate
scale, although a copy, would go far, very far, to
create an original taste amongst us — that is to