DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.29302#0068
( 34 )
first class. The former yields a good wheat crop every year, the latter
yields a crop every second year.
48. Anticipating the information ae to cesses in paragraph 64
t, u , . below, the rates with cesses added yield the
following results ;—
Khalsa.
Jagirs and
Maafis.
Total.
Rs. A.
p.
Us.
A. P.
Rs.
A.
P.
6,323
0
0
1,317+ 0 0
7,640
0
0
6,996
0
0
984
0 0
7,080
O
0
673
0
0
—333
0 0
340
0
0
11
0
0
—25
Q 0
4
0
O
1,206
9
0
137
0 0
1,343
9
0
1,321
Q
0
140
12 0
1,461
12
0
114
7
0
3
12 0
118
3
0
787
7
0
329
4 0
458
3
0
10
0
0
—22
0 0
5
0
0
Former assessment, according to the Rent Roll sanctioned
for A.D. 1882-83
New assessment
_ , , (Amount
Increase by new assessment i per cgnt
Cesses including local rate{^™er
Increase
, . „ , ( Amount
Total increase of revenue and cesses 1 per cen(.
49. When I had decided on the rates and cesses the zamindars of
every pergunnah were called up before me, and
Its effect on the holdings jn presence their former and new assess-
ment, cesses included. I did this tor two rea-
sons : I wanted to see how the new rates really affected each holding ; and
I wished to be sure that, before attestation was commenced, every
zamindar should he warned of the extent to which the new assess-
ment would effect him. By this plan every objection raised was fully
enquired into during attestation. The assessment of every holding
being called in this way in my presence, brought out very strongly the
inequalities of the old distribution described in paragraph 35 above.
The extent to which each pergunnah is affected in its total assess-
ment is given below :—
Pebotnnah.
Govebnmext
Revenue only.
Increase
per cent.
Rate of
ne;v
assessment
Former.
New.
per acre
cultivated.
Cbliabisi ...
1,105
1,393
26
Rs. A. P.
1 13 0
Shalewnr
450
573
27
1 14 O
Che war
336
364
8
18 0
Gajdhar
626
690
10
1 10 O
Chehr
1,290
1,354
5
1 10 0
Thakriaghor
1,637
1,622
— 1
1 13 0
Majhghor
879
1,000
14
1 14 0
TOTAIi
6,323
6,996
11
1 12 0
f [The jagirs and maafis were not assessed at last Settlement. The sum here entered is
the rough valuation subsequently made as a basis for the local rate assessment,
first class. The former yields a good wheat crop every year, the latter
yields a crop every second year.
48. Anticipating the information ae to cesses in paragraph 64
t, u , . below, the rates with cesses added yield the
following results ;—
Khalsa.
Jagirs and
Maafis.
Total.
Rs. A.
p.
Us.
A. P.
Rs.
A.
P.
6,323
0
0
1,317+ 0 0
7,640
0
0
6,996
0
0
984
0 0
7,080
O
0
673
0
0
—333
0 0
340
0
0
11
0
0
—25
Q 0
4
0
O
1,206
9
0
137
0 0
1,343
9
0
1,321
Q
0
140
12 0
1,461
12
0
114
7
0
3
12 0
118
3
0
787
7
0
329
4 0
458
3
0
10
0
0
—22
0 0
5
0
0
Former assessment, according to the Rent Roll sanctioned
for A.D. 1882-83
New assessment
_ , , (Amount
Increase by new assessment i per cgnt
Cesses including local rate{^™er
Increase
, . „ , ( Amount
Total increase of revenue and cesses 1 per cen(.
49. When I had decided on the rates and cesses the zamindars of
every pergunnah were called up before me, and
Its effect on the holdings jn presence their former and new assess-
ment, cesses included. I did this tor two rea-
sons : I wanted to see how the new rates really affected each holding ; and
I wished to be sure that, before attestation was commenced, every
zamindar should he warned of the extent to which the new assess-
ment would effect him. By this plan every objection raised was fully
enquired into during attestation. The assessment of every holding
being called in this way in my presence, brought out very strongly the
inequalities of the old distribution described in paragraph 35 above.
The extent to which each pergunnah is affected in its total assess-
ment is given below :—
Pebotnnah.
Govebnmext
Revenue only.
Increase
per cent.
Rate of
ne;v
assessment
Former.
New.
per acre
cultivated.
Cbliabisi ...
1,105
1,393
26
Rs. A. P.
1 13 0
Shalewnr
450
573
27
1 14 O
Che war
336
364
8
18 0
Gajdhar
626
690
10
1 10 O
Chehr
1,290
1,354
5
1 10 0
Thakriaghor
1,637
1,622
— 1
1 13 0
Majhghor
879
1,000
14
1 14 0
TOTAIi
6,323
6,996
11
1 12 0
f [The jagirs and maafis were not assessed at last Settlement. The sum here entered is
the rough valuation subsequently made as a basis for the local rate assessment,