DOI Seite / Zitierlink:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.15680#0148
128
C. C. EDGAR
pro-bably derived from the same scheme as Fig. !)G.
The grouping of the flowers being adrnittedly Egyptian
makes it more than ever probable that the resemblance
which the flowers themselves bear to Egyptian types
is more than a coincidencc.
The small fragment reproduced as Fig. 98 may find a
place here as it is closely akin to XXIII. 2. The circular
objects are evidently flowers, and the scheme of the design
Tor of Small Jim ^s the same as 011 XXIII. 2 and 5. It may be regardedas
with Flokal an attempt to show the flower in füll face or as seen from
Design1 (3 : 8). above, and this view is all the more probable as \ve find a
very similar design on the Egyptian monuments.-
Fig. 98.
Before proceeding to the next main class I may mention certain vases
and fragments which, like some of the above group, stand midway between
the ' black and red ' and the ' red and black ' techniques.
The vase figured on XXIV. 1 has four handles (two attached horizontally
and two small vertical oues), a high hollow foot and a sieve-bottom.3
Several other fragments could be identified as belonging to the same type
of vessel.
The cross-hatched band round the foot of XXIV. 1 is a pattern which
even in the later style is iisually executed in matt black. The pattern
Fig. 99. Fig. 100.
Fragments with Designs in Black and Red (2 ; 3).
round the bocly is a common and somewhat puzzling motive on the Phyla-
kopi pottery. A few other specimens of itjwith some slight variations in the
details are shown on PI. XXIV. 1-3 and Fig. 108, p. 136. The simpler forms
on Figs. 99, 100 look like the connecting lines of a frieze of spirals (such
1 Reddish olay : matt black paint. Of same Fig. 365 (an exaniple from the tonibof Ramses
type as XXIII. 2, but without red acces- III). Cf. also Evans, Grat. Pict. nos. 52-53.
sories. :1 The type is probably Cretan. See J.H.S.
- Wilkinson, Populär Account, II, p. 30, 1902, p. 335, and PI. XII, no. 2.
C. C. EDGAR
pro-bably derived from the same scheme as Fig. !)G.
The grouping of the flowers being adrnittedly Egyptian
makes it more than ever probable that the resemblance
which the flowers themselves bear to Egyptian types
is more than a coincidencc.
The small fragment reproduced as Fig. 98 may find a
place here as it is closely akin to XXIII. 2. The circular
objects are evidently flowers, and the scheme of the design
Tor of Small Jim ^s the same as 011 XXIII. 2 and 5. It may be regardedas
with Flokal an attempt to show the flower in füll face or as seen from
Design1 (3 : 8). above, and this view is all the more probable as \ve find a
very similar design on the Egyptian monuments.-
Fig. 98.
Before proceeding to the next main class I may mention certain vases
and fragments which, like some of the above group, stand midway between
the ' black and red ' and the ' red and black ' techniques.
The vase figured on XXIV. 1 has four handles (two attached horizontally
and two small vertical oues), a high hollow foot and a sieve-bottom.3
Several other fragments could be identified as belonging to the same type
of vessel.
The cross-hatched band round the foot of XXIV. 1 is a pattern which
even in the later style is iisually executed in matt black. The pattern
Fig. 99. Fig. 100.
Fragments with Designs in Black and Red (2 ; 3).
round the bocly is a common and somewhat puzzling motive on the Phyla-
kopi pottery. A few other specimens of itjwith some slight variations in the
details are shown on PI. XXIV. 1-3 and Fig. 108, p. 136. The simpler forms
on Figs. 99, 100 look like the connecting lines of a frieze of spirals (such
1 Reddish olay : matt black paint. Of same Fig. 365 (an exaniple from the tonibof Ramses
type as XXIII. 2, but without red acces- III). Cf. also Evans, Grat. Pict. nos. 52-53.
sories. :1 The type is probably Cretan. See J.H.S.
- Wilkinson, Populär Account, II, p. 30, 1902, p. 335, and PI. XII, no. 2.