Overview
Metadaten

Camera Work: A Photographic Quarterly — 1903 (Heft 3)

DOI article:
Ward Muir, On Silhouettes
DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.29980#0043
License: Camera Work Online: In Copyright

DWork-Logo
Overview
Facsimile
0.5
1 cm
facsimile
Scroll
Transcription
OCR fulltext
A manually made transcription or edition is also available for this page. Please change to the tab "transrciption" or "edition."
But please understand I don’t hold them up as models to follow: merely as
samples of the plan’s latent possibilities.
And when I speak of silhouette landscapes, I do not necessarily mean
absolute blacks and absolute whites. Intermediate grays, and even detail of
sorts, may occasionally be used with effect. To tell the truth, I find these
intermediate grays uncommonly hard to get rid of. But unquestionably they
ought to be suppressed as far as possible. The really strong design-silhouette
would contain only black and white—no grays at all—of that I am convinced.
“What would be the use of such a picture?” I think I hear some
practical person asking.
What is the use of any picture, after all ? Why, merely to be beautiful,
and therefore to give pleasure to those who love beauty. As a matter of
fact, though, these silhouettes which I suggest might be of far more practical
value than any sort of photograph (except, of course, a scientific one, or a
book or artistic illustration). They would make initial-letter designs, chapter-
headings and -endings, titles, book-covers, book-plates, magazine-covers,
catalogue-covers, panels, dados, and a host of other things, not excluding
posters themselves.
A silhouette photograph does not necessarily represent a night-scene —
it is scarcely necessary to say that. Generally, it represents a sort of no-time
design, neither of light nor darkness. But it may also be distinctively day
or distinctively night. Truth to tell, one gets one’s best ideas for silhouettes
at night. A walk on a moonlight or bright starlight night shows tree and
branch traceries, the outlines of buildings, and so on, that the eye would
fail to observe during the daytime. Often I have noticed some lovely bush
at night and been disappointed when I saw it fully lighted in the morning.
But if on your night-stroll you detect an outline form of any kind which
you think would make a picture, then there is no reason why you shouldn’t
get it with your camera next day; for though to the eye it has lost its
detailless blackness which last night was so attractive, this may be regained
on the plate by extreme under-exposure and in-front-of-the-lens illumination.
I have none of the old-fashioned photographic prejudice against
"moonlight scenes” taken in sunlight. The question which I ask myself
is this: What did the artist wish to represent ? not, What was in front of
his camera when he took the view? The test of a picture consists in its
appearance when finished rather than in the mode of its production.
Which, after all, is indirectly bringing us back to the truth-to-nature quarrel.
Moonlight, I fancy, will turn out to be one of the photographic
designer’sbiggest fields. There is something about moonlight which never
fails to touch a sympathetic chord in every mind, however blasé. Moonlight
in a wood, with solemn tree-trunks fretted against the ghostly light, moon-
light on a river, or behind church-spires, or on the Alps — these are a few
pictures which will at once rise to the mind.
Needless to say, all these could be suggested with the aid of sun-
light and careful under-exposure. Until Dr. Grün perfects his wonderful
liquid lens, we shall be unable actually to make negatives of our moonlight
Transcription
There is no information available here for this page.

Temporarily hide column
 
Annotationen