DOI Seite / Zitierlink:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.29591#0401
Commentary: Chap. 34—35
397
same as the teulesa here (cp. ZDMG. 60, 317). From IV, 7
we gather that the three first lesya s, viz. the black, the blue and
the grey one, occur only in the first two classes, the Bhavana-
vasin’s and the Vyantara’s. But the Sarvarthasiddhi (cp. ZDMG.
60, 290) takes IV, 2 to mean that the four first lesya s (including
the teu°) occur in the three first classes of gods, and excludes
IV, 7. Our text does not agree with either of these statements,
as it ascribes the teulesa also to the Vaimanika’s.
56. clurgati is explained by narakatiryaggati. I wonder how
it is possible that these kinds of lesya s could occur even amongst
the highest gods.
58. parinata here and in the following verses is translated
by ’joined (with the soul)' in SBE. XLV, p. 203. But this can
scarcely be quite correct, as D. explains it by dtmarupatam dpanna
having reached its own (real) state’, i. e. ’being fully developed’
as far as I understand it. — S. refers to a slightly different read-
ing, viz.: na vi kassa vi uvavao.
61. ’hitthie is = adhitisthet.
Chapter 35.
D.: anantarddhyayane lesydbhihitds tatra cdprcisastalesyatayd-
gatdili prasastd evddhisthdtavycih [ etac ca bhiksugunavyavasthitena
samyag vidhdtum sakyam | ato bhiksugunaparijndndrtham adhund-
nagdramdrgagatindmakam pcihcatrimsam adhyayanam drabhycite \
tasyci cedam adisutram |j
This lecture, which deals very generally with the life of
a saint, seems to be to a certain degree the final chapter of our
text. The thirty-sixth and last one, containing a survey of living
and lifeless beings, stands somewhat outside the whole scheme of
our text.
3. cojja- = cdurya- (cp. Pischel § 284).
4. citrapradhdnam grham citragrham | D. — ullova- is = Skt.
ulloca-. As far as I can see Pischel does not give any examples
of va instead of ca.
5. S. reads: dukkardni u vdreum, and adds: pathyate ca j duk-
kardni nivdreum \
397
same as the teulesa here (cp. ZDMG. 60, 317). From IV, 7
we gather that the three first lesya s, viz. the black, the blue and
the grey one, occur only in the first two classes, the Bhavana-
vasin’s and the Vyantara’s. But the Sarvarthasiddhi (cp. ZDMG.
60, 290) takes IV, 2 to mean that the four first lesya s (including
the teu°) occur in the three first classes of gods, and excludes
IV, 7. Our text does not agree with either of these statements,
as it ascribes the teulesa also to the Vaimanika’s.
56. clurgati is explained by narakatiryaggati. I wonder how
it is possible that these kinds of lesya s could occur even amongst
the highest gods.
58. parinata here and in the following verses is translated
by ’joined (with the soul)' in SBE. XLV, p. 203. But this can
scarcely be quite correct, as D. explains it by dtmarupatam dpanna
having reached its own (real) state’, i. e. ’being fully developed’
as far as I understand it. — S. refers to a slightly different read-
ing, viz.: na vi kassa vi uvavao.
61. ’hitthie is = adhitisthet.
Chapter 35.
D.: anantarddhyayane lesydbhihitds tatra cdprcisastalesyatayd-
gatdili prasastd evddhisthdtavycih [ etac ca bhiksugunavyavasthitena
samyag vidhdtum sakyam | ato bhiksugunaparijndndrtham adhund-
nagdramdrgagatindmakam pcihcatrimsam adhyayanam drabhycite \
tasyci cedam adisutram |j
This lecture, which deals very generally with the life of
a saint, seems to be to a certain degree the final chapter of our
text. The thirty-sixth and last one, containing a survey of living
and lifeless beings, stands somewhat outside the whole scheme of
our text.
3. cojja- = cdurya- (cp. Pischel § 284).
4. citrapradhdnam grham citragrham | D. — ullova- is = Skt.
ulloca-. As far as I can see Pischel does not give any examples
of va instead of ca.
5. S. reads: dukkardni u vdreum, and adds: pathyate ca j duk-
kardni nivdreum \