DOI Seite / Zitierlink:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.30696#0237
PETRONIUS ARBITER.
1476.-]
\
227
Antorjius were entirely ignorant of it.’ La Serna Santander has
omitted to mention it, even in the corrections to his third part or
volume ; and although Brunet refers us to Count Reviczky’s catalogue
for the existence of this earlier impression, he is pleased to call the
ensuing one the ‘ Editio Princeps.’ Manuel du Libraire, vol. ii. p. 274.
In describing this impression, I must necessarily insert what may be
supposed to belong to tlxe Panegyric of Trajan by Pliny ; but as
these two works are blended together, in the present volume, the
reader will not exact a severe method of description. In the edition
under consideration, it will be necessary to begin with the following
extract; from tlie 3d page of the prefatory address of Puteolanus to
Iacobus Antiquarius:—which gives at once the contents of the volume.
Additi sunt unde
cim alii Pansegirici no Pliniano quide pares sed tamen
non inelegantes aut recusandi : mira in singulis erudi
tio. Adieci: ut magnitudo uoluminis iusta eet: Iuliiagri
colae uitam per Corneliu Tacitum conscripta: quae me
ita afficit delectat tenet: ut nihil unquam pari uolupta
te legerim. Fragmentu Petronii arbitri postremu locum
tenet 8c quasi agmen claudit incuria quide temporum
macum 8c adeo mutilatu ut uix cognosci possit: eiusmo
di tamen ut non reiici debeat : haec tuis auspiciis in luce
redeunt: Debebunt tibi qui legerint: quaquam pro tuis
summis uirtutib 9 omnes tibi debent. Vale decus meu.
therefore unnecessary to repeat here’]—‘ Quam Plinii Panegyrici & ceterorum editionem
cum Arnzenius & Schwarzius editores illius retulerint ad an. 1476, eosque etiam secuti
sint b. Ernestius in Bibl. Fabriciana, & Clar. Harlesius in brevi notitia literaturae romanse
nuper emissa, sed Saxius in Hist. Lit. Typog. Mediol. ex ipsa puteolani praef. demonstraverit
librum editum esse sub ipsum pubertatis annum Jo. Galeacii Ducis mediol. an. 1469 nati,
conjicit Cl. Harlesius. ed. priorem 1476 iteratam fuisse 1482. cf. illum in Plinii edd. p. 413,
& quae disputaviraus in not. Plinii epp. & paneg. praemissa p. xxxix. Neque sic Maittairo
accedimus qui hanc collectionem cum petronii satirico jam an. m.cccclxxvii prodiisse
refert, cf. ibul. Goldastus vero, in petronii a se curati an. 1610 prolegomenis p. 14, com-
memorat exemplar mediolanense, quod prsecesserit germanicum Lipsiense Herm. Buscliii
an. 1500 & parisinum Beginaldi Chalderii. Burmannus & novissimus edilor C. G.
Antonius ignorare se profitentur, quo anno prodierit. Reviczius Comes in catal. p. 108
conjicit, illam typis Lavagnae mediol. excusam fuisse.’ Edit. Bipont. Petronii. p. xx.xxi.
1476.-]
\
227
Antorjius were entirely ignorant of it.’ La Serna Santander has
omitted to mention it, even in the corrections to his third part or
volume ; and although Brunet refers us to Count Reviczky’s catalogue
for the existence of this earlier impression, he is pleased to call the
ensuing one the ‘ Editio Princeps.’ Manuel du Libraire, vol. ii. p. 274.
In describing this impression, I must necessarily insert what may be
supposed to belong to tlxe Panegyric of Trajan by Pliny ; but as
these two works are blended together, in the present volume, the
reader will not exact a severe method of description. In the edition
under consideration, it will be necessary to begin with the following
extract; from tlie 3d page of the prefatory address of Puteolanus to
Iacobus Antiquarius:—which gives at once the contents of the volume.
Additi sunt unde
cim alii Pansegirici no Pliniano quide pares sed tamen
non inelegantes aut recusandi : mira in singulis erudi
tio. Adieci: ut magnitudo uoluminis iusta eet: Iuliiagri
colae uitam per Corneliu Tacitum conscripta: quae me
ita afficit delectat tenet: ut nihil unquam pari uolupta
te legerim. Fragmentu Petronii arbitri postremu locum
tenet 8c quasi agmen claudit incuria quide temporum
macum 8c adeo mutilatu ut uix cognosci possit: eiusmo
di tamen ut non reiici debeat : haec tuis auspiciis in luce
redeunt: Debebunt tibi qui legerint: quaquam pro tuis
summis uirtutib 9 omnes tibi debent. Vale decus meu.
therefore unnecessary to repeat here’]—‘ Quam Plinii Panegyrici & ceterorum editionem
cum Arnzenius & Schwarzius editores illius retulerint ad an. 1476, eosque etiam secuti
sint b. Ernestius in Bibl. Fabriciana, & Clar. Harlesius in brevi notitia literaturae romanse
nuper emissa, sed Saxius in Hist. Lit. Typog. Mediol. ex ipsa puteolani praef. demonstraverit
librum editum esse sub ipsum pubertatis annum Jo. Galeacii Ducis mediol. an. 1469 nati,
conjicit Cl. Harlesius. ed. priorem 1476 iteratam fuisse 1482. cf. illum in Plinii edd. p. 413,
& quae disputaviraus in not. Plinii epp. & paneg. praemissa p. xxxix. Neque sic Maittairo
accedimus qui hanc collectionem cum petronii satirico jam an. m.cccclxxvii prodiisse
refert, cf. ibul. Goldastus vero, in petronii a se curati an. 1610 prolegomenis p. 14, com-
memorat exemplar mediolanense, quod prsecesserit germanicum Lipsiense Herm. Buscliii
an. 1500 & parisinum Beginaldi Chalderii. Burmannus & novissimus edilor C. G.
Antonius ignorare se profitentur, quo anno prodierit. Reviczius Comes in catal. p. 108
conjicit, illam typis Lavagnae mediol. excusam fuisse.’ Edit. Bipont. Petronii. p. xx.xxi.