DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.1964#0144
ii4 Kefbrmat,Rotvvil.
*t®rr^w|aus«mnD§ofa/apudGolda(tm3vricb6sss§«nseti/»i<s.
1
KiMtgt Cfedjt
3wso twrfcen aud[> tfcfafytn/ fcariroi jsemassbt Dm awfcewi
llmt ^mmtofcr mit <Xt$tmsol$ttmnb ethmw
*"* RatioesbquodCumRorfviklisisiuditiuöisicCsiläreumiordi-
BariaiurisdiäioneexCs&risconcessionegaudcns>& Cum quibusuis
ötdinariiscoacurrens^Vadösiälaccssent>veispccJalitertfduilcgian
nonsunt, velfeiusto ac legitimo tempore ad iüstiriamailministran-
damnonofFerant,vcI'c3cemtioncssiiasallegent&doceant:vty«>.4^r.
titjt.fart.s.nota.uU ludieiumhoc Rotvvifenfetxindepsr prantentio-
ncm,vclinsiibsidiumcumuktiü'e&legiticD:c iuriidi&iönem exercere
pOtestJtaimpctrara€D.^Bv©,(i33cDutl0»3n&<Sc^trm6ricsfinIudicio
RotvViknsi>quärum executio pro reali imrnissione demandatur oppi-
doSSJJarfcadj.Hisautemmsinuatis &reprodu&is RotwilsjDuxw iir-
tembergensis fese opposiiit,petiitque ad se partes remitti,caussam ad-
iicienss öas?«racrori 3J«fcseae|?attmttx>(Ie/ &quodipsi executiocom-
petat3allcgans prseterea pritiilegia contra Judicium ju OJosweii. Re-
plicatumest ex textu nöstro häc>remisik>ncm i&o casulocum' non ha-
bere,cumsitcasijsre/eruatus cme&}cf)assi interlocutoria, bictticil Dies«
@a^e«rl4ngt»«6öfolätDt?c^fcWsrteiftbefgenus repetüt priora fun-
damentä; SSmilitef Marbacenfes offerfent feadparendum,siUissus
ducisinterueniar. Postea conclusione faära,sentehtialataest: quod
Marbacenses a&orem.sous sernes «ri<mg(m!Xecfycn»76isj$t»,£esfgm'cl}t
n«c&s?fcmm«tJ)/69ipcmt)(r3(cW«inpscSenscßu(6ig/t)nbscinBaru6cr90r*
l^«l»)nt>1i8ri<ss«rsanns.AbhacteiltentiaappcllatuniadCarncram:Ied
inCamera pronutttiatum», rnale appellatum & bene pronunciatum^.
Ex'h'oc&pra:missisfündamfcntis> quiahoccasucognouitDux Wür-
tejnbergensis velofficialeseiüs, quo casunon est dubium,quodipsi
suassenrennasexequidebeant,sedquiaha>ccaussä Rotvvilam deuo-
luta,&iniustötemporepetitaremissioveloblatio iusticia:fa&a: Ideo
firmata fuit Iurisdi&iö Rotvvilensis > contra quamtunc non habent
locumpriuilegia. Etindejcumiudicium juDvottrrtt sit Carfareum &
ordinatiumpersesejpfoptereapotüitexecutionemmandareinfcrio-
ribus,qui tenentur in' eo pärere, vtinfra dicam,adta./S.part.j. Gylman.
Ossicium iadi-
cis Nobile.
*t®rr^w|aus«mnD§ofa/apudGolda(tm3vricb6sss§«nseti/»i<s.
1
KiMtgt Cfedjt
3wso twrfcen aud[> tfcfafytn/ fcariroi jsemassbt Dm awfcewi
llmt ^mmtofcr mit <Xt$tmsol$ttmnb ethmw
*"* RatioesbquodCumRorfviklisisiuditiuöisicCsiläreumiordi-
BariaiurisdiäioneexCs&risconcessionegaudcns>& Cum quibusuis
ötdinariiscoacurrens^Vadösiälaccssent>veispccJalitertfduilcgian
nonsunt, velfeiusto ac legitimo tempore ad iüstiriamailministran-
damnonofFerant,vcI'c3cemtioncssiiasallegent&doceant:vty«>.4^r.
titjt.fart.s.nota.uU ludieiumhoc Rotvvifenfetxindepsr prantentio-
ncm,vclinsiibsidiumcumuktiü'e&legiticD:c iuriidi&iönem exercere
pOtestJtaimpctrara€D.^Bv©,(i33cDutl0»3n&<Sc^trm6ricsfinIudicio
RotvViknsi>quärum executio pro reali imrnissione demandatur oppi-
doSSJJarfcadj.Hisautemmsinuatis &reprodu&is RotwilsjDuxw iir-
tembergensis fese opposiiit,petiitque ad se partes remitti,caussam ad-
iicienss öas?«racrori 3J«fcseae|?attmttx>(Ie/ &quodipsi executiocom-
petat3allcgans prseterea pritiilegia contra Judicium ju OJosweii. Re-
plicatumest ex textu nöstro häc>remisik>ncm i&o casulocum' non ha-
bere,cumsitcasijsre/eruatus cme&}cf)assi interlocutoria, bictticil Dies«
@a^e«rl4ngt»«6öfolätDt?c^fcWsrteiftbefgenus repetüt priora fun-
damentä; SSmilitef Marbacenfes offerfent feadparendum,siUissus
ducisinterueniar. Postea conclusione faära,sentehtialataest: quod
Marbacenses a&orem.sous sernes «ri<mg(m!Xecfycn»76isj$t»,£esfgm'cl}t
n«c&s?fcmm«tJ)/69ipcmt)(r3(cW«inpscSenscßu(6ig/t)nbscinBaru6cr90r*
l^«l»)nt>1i8ri<ss«rsanns.AbhacteiltentiaappcllatuniadCarncram:Ied
inCamera pronutttiatum», rnale appellatum & bene pronunciatum^.
Ex'h'oc&pra:missisfündamfcntis> quiahoccasucognouitDux Wür-
tejnbergensis velofficialeseiüs, quo casunon est dubium,quodipsi
suassenrennasexequidebeant,sedquiaha>ccaussä Rotvvilam deuo-
luta,&iniustötemporepetitaremissioveloblatio iusticia:fa&a: Ideo
firmata fuit Iurisdi&iö Rotvvilensis > contra quamtunc non habent
locumpriuilegia. Etindejcumiudicium juDvottrrtt sit Carfareum &
ordinatiumpersesejpfoptereapotüitexecutionemmandareinfcrio-
ribus,qui tenentur in' eo pärere, vtinfra dicam,adta./S.part.j. Gylman.
Ossicium iadi-
cis Nobile.