' trio-lyph' motive between the loops on either side. Sometimes again, as
in Fie. 293, 6, the ' triglyph' appears without the attached curves.
The chequer-work ornament, incorporated as we have seen in
Designs on Late Mycenaean 'Kraters' and Goblets showing
Evolution of Frieze with Ritual Axes.
' triglyph'-like bars of the 'Palace Style' 'amphora', Fig. 292,1—which,
like the Double-Axe ' metope', seems to have temporarily vanished from
the ceramic repertory—makes its reappearance in an analogous position
in the central space of these later ' triglyphs ' (Fig. 293, S).
Here, too, we have evidence of motives derived from other designs of
' See E. J. Forsdyke in B.M. Cat. Greek Late Mycenaean B) 'and are common in
and Etruscan Vases, vol. i, p. 206 (A 1075). Sub-Mycenaean and Early Geometric pottery.
'In the intermediate period chequers were Cf. A 1014, Kaiymnos ; 'E<j>. 'Apx-, i9°4j P-
hardly used at all, but they reappear now ' (in 29, Fig. 9 (Mouliana), and Vrokastro.'
in Fie. 293, 6, the ' triglyph' appears without the attached curves.
The chequer-work ornament, incorporated as we have seen in
Designs on Late Mycenaean 'Kraters' and Goblets showing
Evolution of Frieze with Ritual Axes.
' triglyph'-like bars of the 'Palace Style' 'amphora', Fig. 292,1—which,
like the Double-Axe ' metope', seems to have temporarily vanished from
the ceramic repertory—makes its reappearance in an analogous position
in the central space of these later ' triglyphs ' (Fig. 293, S).
Here, too, we have evidence of motives derived from other designs of
' See E. J. Forsdyke in B.M. Cat. Greek Late Mycenaean B) 'and are common in
and Etruscan Vases, vol. i, p. 206 (A 1075). Sub-Mycenaean and Early Geometric pottery.
'In the intermediate period chequers were Cf. A 1014, Kaiymnos ; 'E<j>. 'Apx-, i9°4j P-
hardly used at all, but they reappear now ' (in 29, Fig. 9 (Mouliana), and Vrokastro.'