130 COL. XX
8. a-Y-s swh a-e-s 'y n-y n nw plege a-e-y hms a
hry a-e-y
9. rym hms 5S-t te mw-t n pe mte a bl e-s z n-y mpr
10. rym sp-sn pe sr s stn wr tp 'Np lkh n ls-t~k a
ht-k 0s-phr
11. sc n r-w n t ht-s(?) lkh n n r-w n t ht-s (?) ¥■ n
r-w n te-k-t
12. nmte-t p nt e-5r-k a lkh-f e-5r-k cm-f bn pcy rfm-f
a p t z pe-k
13. Is p Is n p scy pe-k scl pa 'Tm
14. nte-k lkh-f n pe-k Is e-f hr snf ty hte-t m-s-s e°r-k
mt-t a wc hm
15. n nhe nte-k mt-t ar-f n sp VII e-"*r-k t n^m-f a
t plege m-mne e-'r-k
16. sp wc-t tys n cyw e-'r-k ty-s ar-f
17. nt e°r-k zt-f a p nhe a ty-f a t pl'ge
m-mne
18. hms 'S-t e-s mt't a p nhe cbcrtct e-s tyt a p nhe
19. n mc-t z e,cr-k hsy te-y ne hys-t-k p nhe te-y
ne hys
20. n'm-k e-'r-k hse n t p scy e-^r-k mhy n t-t h-t
te-y ne hys-k
21. sc zt p nhe sp-sn n sym ke-z mc-t p fty n p scy
p s n Gb 'S-t t nt
22. mt-t a p nhe p nhe n mc-t t tltyle-t n hwm-p-t
p zlh n Hr-st
1. 10. ls't-k. This form seems due to a confusion in endeavouring to
write in archaic style. The / is quite unwarranted by Egyptian. We may
compare the t added before the object pronouns following stm-f\ cf. also
note to 1. 20. We have here a passage in which very modern forms
Juuidju-To e£io\ are mixed with older forms hms 'S-f (past stm-f) and
th's h-t-k.
1. 12. nmte-t: if this means 'tail' we may compare Pist. Sophia, p. 323
TT*oipo junc^T, ' the point of the tail of the dragon.'
bn py : the Achmimic vetitive jum^juinp, cf. 21/23, probably derived
from the old vetitive m. It occurs in Eg. as bn, Pap. Mag. Harris 8/7.
8. a-Y-s swh a-e-s 'y n-y n nw plege a-e-y hms a
hry a-e-y
9. rym hms 5S-t te mw-t n pe mte a bl e-s z n-y mpr
10. rym sp-sn pe sr s stn wr tp 'Np lkh n ls-t~k a
ht-k 0s-phr
11. sc n r-w n t ht-s(?) lkh n n r-w n t ht-s (?) ¥■ n
r-w n te-k-t
12. nmte-t p nt e-5r-k a lkh-f e-5r-k cm-f bn pcy rfm-f
a p t z pe-k
13. Is p Is n p scy pe-k scl pa 'Tm
14. nte-k lkh-f n pe-k Is e-f hr snf ty hte-t m-s-s e°r-k
mt-t a wc hm
15. n nhe nte-k mt-t ar-f n sp VII e-"*r-k t n^m-f a
t plege m-mne e-'r-k
16. sp wc-t tys n cyw e-'r-k ty-s ar-f
17. nt e°r-k zt-f a p nhe a ty-f a t pl'ge
m-mne
18. hms 'S-t e-s mt't a p nhe cbcrtct e-s tyt a p nhe
19. n mc-t z e,cr-k hsy te-y ne hys-t-k p nhe te-y
ne hys
20. n'm-k e-'r-k hse n t p scy e-^r-k mhy n t-t h-t
te-y ne hys-k
21. sc zt p nhe sp-sn n sym ke-z mc-t p fty n p scy
p s n Gb 'S-t t nt
22. mt-t a p nhe p nhe n mc-t t tltyle-t n hwm-p-t
p zlh n Hr-st
1. 10. ls't-k. This form seems due to a confusion in endeavouring to
write in archaic style. The / is quite unwarranted by Egyptian. We may
compare the t added before the object pronouns following stm-f\ cf. also
note to 1. 20. We have here a passage in which very modern forms
Juuidju-To e£io\ are mixed with older forms hms 'S-f (past stm-f) and
th's h-t-k.
1. 12. nmte-t: if this means 'tail' we may compare Pist. Sophia, p. 323
TT*oipo junc^T, ' the point of the tail of the dragon.'
bn py : the Achmimic vetitive jum^juinp, cf. 21/23, probably derived
from the old vetitive m. It occurs in Eg. as bn, Pap. Mag. Harris 8/7.