painter the Panaitios Master1 and it is now generally agreed that
five of these vases (5*, 6*, 8*, 9* and 11*) are the work of his
hand. Vase 4* was attributed to the Penthesilea Painter by Furt-
wangler, but Beazley with perhaps better reason has assigned it
to a different hand, to the artist who painted 2*. Miss Radford
considers that two painters were at work on this vase, the inte-
rior being the work of an artist she has termed the Polychrome
Painter and the exterior by another nameless artist. This view
has not met with general acceptance. Hartwig attributed 13* to
Onesimos, but Buschor, with whom Beazley agrees, prefers to
consider this vase as the work of a painter he terms the Perugia
Painter: Miss Radford attributed it to the Brygos Painter but
that attribution would seem to be forbidden by the style.
Summed up briefly the following division of the work of
Euphronios seems generally accepted:
Euphronios as artist: 1*, 3*, 7*, 10* and 14*.
Onesimos: 12*.
Onesimos or the Perugia Master: 13*.
Panaitios Painter: 5*, 6*, 8*, 9*, n* and 15*.
Penthesilea Painter or another: 2*, 4*.
There is no variation in the νγραψεν signatures; of the others
the following variations are to be found:
EV(DPONIO^ EPOIEtEN : 4*.
EVCDRONIOi EPOIEtEN : 12*.
EVORONIO^ ΕΓΟΙΕ^ΕΝ: 6*, n*, 13*.
EVOPONIO^ EPOIE^EN: 8*, 9*.
EVORONIO^ ΕΓΟΓΙΕίΕΝ : 5*.
The following καλός names are used by Euphronios:
Glaukon: 2* ?, 4*.
Panaitios: 5*, 6*.
Leagros: 7*, 14*.
Erothemis: 12*.
Lykos: 13*.
Lyios: 12*.
1 Furtwangler even went so far (F.R. ii, p. 134) as to regard Onesimos as the
Panaitios Painter and assigned 13* to him. This view, of course, is not accepted.
E 377 J
five of these vases (5*, 6*, 8*, 9* and 11*) are the work of his
hand. Vase 4* was attributed to the Penthesilea Painter by Furt-
wangler, but Beazley with perhaps better reason has assigned it
to a different hand, to the artist who painted 2*. Miss Radford
considers that two painters were at work on this vase, the inte-
rior being the work of an artist she has termed the Polychrome
Painter and the exterior by another nameless artist. This view
has not met with general acceptance. Hartwig attributed 13* to
Onesimos, but Buschor, with whom Beazley agrees, prefers to
consider this vase as the work of a painter he terms the Perugia
Painter: Miss Radford attributed it to the Brygos Painter but
that attribution would seem to be forbidden by the style.
Summed up briefly the following division of the work of
Euphronios seems generally accepted:
Euphronios as artist: 1*, 3*, 7*, 10* and 14*.
Onesimos: 12*.
Onesimos or the Perugia Master: 13*.
Panaitios Painter: 5*, 6*, 8*, 9*, n* and 15*.
Penthesilea Painter or another: 2*, 4*.
There is no variation in the νγραψεν signatures; of the others
the following variations are to be found:
EV(DPONIO^ EPOIEtEN : 4*.
EVCDRONIOi EPOIEtEN : 12*.
EVORONIO^ ΕΓΟΙΕ^ΕΝ: 6*, n*, 13*.
EVOPONIO^ EPOIE^EN: 8*, 9*.
EVORONIO^ ΕΓΟΓΙΕίΕΝ : 5*.
The following καλός names are used by Euphronios:
Glaukon: 2* ?, 4*.
Panaitios: 5*, 6*.
Leagros: 7*, 14*.
Erothemis: 12*.
Lykos: 13*.
Lyios: 12*.
1 Furtwangler even went so far (F.R. ii, p. 134) as to regard Onesimos as the
Panaitios Painter and assigned 13* to him. This view, of course, is not accepted.
E 377 J