DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.49827#0344
I)
GENERAL INDEX.
ABSENCE-
of coparcener no bar to partition, 99, 100.
ADOPTION—
obsolete forms. 144—-158.
adopted sons in the proper sense of the term, 156.
an abstract of the principal rules on adoption in the Smritis.
156—158.
abolition of early forms of adoption, 158.
Kritrima adoption, 156, 158, 159.
Dattaka adoption, 156, 159—166.
modern innovations in the law of adoption, 159.
false doctrines, 159—166.
question as to formalities essential in an adoption, 159—161.
restrictions in regard to the age of the person to be adopted, 161,162.
adoption of a daughter’s son and of a sister’s son, 162.
supposed prohibition to adopt one whose mother the adopter could
not have married, 162.
refutation of this doctrine, 163—165.
Dvyamushyayana adoption. 165, 166.
character of the Dattakamimamsa, 166.
share of an adopted son where a legitimate son is afterwards born,
182.
various rules in regard to this subject, 182, 183.
various explanations of the terms ‘ a third share ’ and ‘ a fourth
share,’ 183—185.
after-born sons in the case of Dvyamushyayana adoptions, 185.
right of representation in the case of adopted sons, 185.
See Bvjin, Niyoga, Polyandry, Sons, Succession, and the General
Note to Lecture VII, at the close of these Lectures.
according to the Dattakagiromani, &c., 299—325. ,
ADULTERY—
punishment ordained for, 78.
AGE. See Adoption, Minority.
AGNATES. See Sapinda, Succession.
ALIENATION—
according to the Smritis :
the father may alienate hereditary property at will, 82.
gradual restriction of this power, 83, 84.
what was left of it, 84.
‘power of the eldest son, 85.
discretionary power of the manager, 86, 87.
restrictions on alienation of immovable property, 90, 91.
alienation of naturally indivisible objects, 93.
gifts made by the father cannot be resumed by him, 96.
equal ownership of father and sons in property ancestral, 99.
alienation considered as evidence of contested partition, 105, 106.
GENERAL INDEX.
ABSENCE-
of coparcener no bar to partition, 99, 100.
ADOPTION—
obsolete forms. 144—-158.
adopted sons in the proper sense of the term, 156.
an abstract of the principal rules on adoption in the Smritis.
156—158.
abolition of early forms of adoption, 158.
Kritrima adoption, 156, 158, 159.
Dattaka adoption, 156, 159—166.
modern innovations in the law of adoption, 159.
false doctrines, 159—166.
question as to formalities essential in an adoption, 159—161.
restrictions in regard to the age of the person to be adopted, 161,162.
adoption of a daughter’s son and of a sister’s son, 162.
supposed prohibition to adopt one whose mother the adopter could
not have married, 162.
refutation of this doctrine, 163—165.
Dvyamushyayana adoption. 165, 166.
character of the Dattakamimamsa, 166.
share of an adopted son where a legitimate son is afterwards born,
182.
various rules in regard to this subject, 182, 183.
various explanations of the terms ‘ a third share ’ and ‘ a fourth
share,’ 183—185.
after-born sons in the case of Dvyamushyayana adoptions, 185.
right of representation in the case of adopted sons, 185.
See Bvjin, Niyoga, Polyandry, Sons, Succession, and the General
Note to Lecture VII, at the close of these Lectures.
according to the Dattakagiromani, &c., 299—325. ,
ADULTERY—
punishment ordained for, 78.
AGE. See Adoption, Minority.
AGNATES. See Sapinda, Succession.
ALIENATION—
according to the Smritis :
the father may alienate hereditary property at will, 82.
gradual restriction of this power, 83, 84.
what was left of it, 84.
‘power of the eldest son, 85.
discretionary power of the manager, 86, 87.
restrictions on alienation of immovable property, 90, 91.
alienation of naturally indivisible objects, 93.
gifts made by the father cannot be resumed by him, 96.
equal ownership of father and sons in property ancestral, 99.
alienation considered as evidence of contested partition, 105, 106.