Universitätsbibliothek HeidelbergUniversitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Metadaten

Morrill, Georgiana Lea
Speculum Gy de Warewyke: an English poem : here for the first time printed and first edited from the manuscripts — London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1898

DOI Seite / Zitierlink:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.61385#0058
Überblick
Faksimile
0.5
1 cm
facsimile
Vollansicht
OCR-Volltext
lii

Chapter IV.—Genealogical History of the Texts.

distinct readings of AVHVR., proving beyond doubt the nearness of
the connection. To the differences between the texts could be added
those of a trifling character, showing that it is impossible for to
have been derived from R. and R must then form a class by
themselves, to be accounted for as representing a theoretical MS.
H1R not hitherto discovered.
§ 8. Agreement of Aft within the Group Z.
Common readings pointing to a relationship A1.R are as follows :
v. 8 bu om.~\ A1.R. 26 hem] om. 70 Alpere] Aller. 411
saipe] seide. 507 willen it] hit wolen. 518 pe] om. 563 wele]
it. 625 nyll] wole. 635 For (But)] And. 695 sinne] his sinne.
700 nyl] wole. 715 for lore] ilore. 759 I wrought] wrouht. 768
I schryue] shriue. 773 ifounde] founde. 815 euene (bidene)] ene.
876 pu] pat pu. Here may be included the large number of coin-
cidences, in which the only representative of group Y is the MS. D :
915, 916, 919—921, 924, 931—933, 937, 938, 939, 945—948, 951,
952, 954—956, 964,*969, 970, 973, 974, 977, 980, 983, 993, 995,
999, 1000, 1001, 1004, 1005, 1011, 1024, 1031.
AT is naturally not copied from R, the younger MS. Neither is
R a copy of Ar This truth is shown as follows :
R not from A1: v. 22 weye] lawe R. 102 hep noht gode] are
swithe. 116 sleupe] slownes. 124 anuied] fro mynde. 237 binomen
him] fro hym tane. See additional instances to the end of the
poem.
Considerable difference between Ar and R proves that R cannot
have been derived from the older MS. Ar It is equally impossible
that transcript (5) retaining correct readings transmitted to Jf and R
alike, but not reproduced in A1, be derived from A1- cf. 11. 179,
180; 551, 552; 644—646. The list of individual mistakes in A1,
where H1 and R preserve the correct reading, is sufficiently imposing
to corroborate the conclusion that neither R nor its source was
derived from Ar Hence it must be concluded, that A1 and R,
forming with a MSS. group, go back to a source now lost, but
represented by f (fifty.
 
Annotationen