DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.4377#0411
736 APPENDIX NO. III.
Prom the context,we should expect iraoa. Ad[xar^a
■7T£irpi)fj.evov [xiTa ribv aurou .... ttuvtcov e^ayopsoo'jcra,
the nominative being the writer of the imprecation.
But the letters are all quite distinct as they are
given in the facsimile, and it is difficult to believe
that the scribe would have committed two such
grammatical blunders in two consecutive lines. If
s^ayopevcov refers to the offending person, it is pos-
sible that it may be used in the sense of ' confessing'
sin, as in the following passage from Plutarch, De
Supcrstit. c. vii.—s^co xa.Qr)Ta.i.....TroXhdxig Si
yu[A,vog sv 7trrp\io xa7^tv(io6[j.svos s^ayopsvsi nvag otfiapriag
aurou xcu 7r7<i)(iu.e\£Hx.g.
1. 6. s[xo) M. After Ss I read HH. The second of
these letters must have been added by mistake,
unless Ave suppose a Doric form rj'vj for efy, of which
there is no example.
ofioa-rsyrjo-da-j). This word is not given by the
lexicographers, though bpoa-rsyog occurs.
1. 8. rj xal emroigavTa., " Or directing another to
accuse me."
No. 86, Plate 8 (of this volume).
avtspio rbv Kpvcp]a [r]cfiov[ra] ttjv ovaraXriv fjv airwAtaa \iv r-
ote . . .JAoic toXq 'VoooKkeuQ Aaparpi ical Kovjoa ko.1 utoit;
[tt] OCT [t
ical Traa]atg' tnrocovri pzv [fijmu Kal sXevdspa kofiiaaplvoig r\b
Kopi(j]rpov, Kal tpol rij Kopi^optvij Kal rii> airooicovri,
fit} air] oStdovn St Aaparpog Kat Kovpag Kal OtCov rav ir[a- (5)
pa A\aparpi Kal Kovpa iravrwv Kal irauav, Kal tl ttov irp-
a]0ij, tvOupiov tar (a) Aaparpoq Kal Kovpac" avarlQiipi St k[ciI
i!r]([i irXlov t^ireiaa irapa rbv araOpbv rov Vir Ipov t-'£yr\_i)-
pLvov, Aaparpi Kal Kovpa' Aicnroiva, Ipol St
drna- (10)
avarlBijpi Aaparpi Kal Kopq rhv ri). . .
Prom the context,we should expect iraoa. Ad[xar^a
■7T£irpi)fj.evov [xiTa ribv aurou .... ttuvtcov e^ayopsoo'jcra,
the nominative being the writer of the imprecation.
But the letters are all quite distinct as they are
given in the facsimile, and it is difficult to believe
that the scribe would have committed two such
grammatical blunders in two consecutive lines. If
s^ayopevcov refers to the offending person, it is pos-
sible that it may be used in the sense of ' confessing'
sin, as in the following passage from Plutarch, De
Supcrstit. c. vii.—s^co xa.Qr)Ta.i.....TroXhdxig Si
yu[A,vog sv 7trrp\io xa7^tv(io6[j.svos s^ayopsvsi nvag otfiapriag
aurou xcu 7r7<i)(iu.e\£Hx.g.
1. 6. s[xo) M. After Ss I read HH. The second of
these letters must have been added by mistake,
unless Ave suppose a Doric form rj'vj for efy, of which
there is no example.
ofioa-rsyrjo-da-j). This word is not given by the
lexicographers, though bpoa-rsyog occurs.
1. 8. rj xal emroigavTa., " Or directing another to
accuse me."
No. 86, Plate 8 (of this volume).
avtspio rbv Kpvcp]a [r]cfiov[ra] ttjv ovaraXriv fjv airwAtaa \iv r-
ote . . .JAoic toXq 'VoooKkeuQ Aaparpi ical Kovjoa ko.1 utoit;
[tt] OCT [t
ical Traa]atg' tnrocovri pzv [fijmu Kal sXevdspa kofiiaaplvoig r\b
Kopi(j]rpov, Kal tpol rij Kopi^optvij Kal rii> airooicovri,
fit} air] oStdovn St Aaparpog Kat Kovpag Kal OtCov rav ir[a- (5)
pa A\aparpi Kal Kovpa iravrwv Kal irauav, Kal tl ttov irp-
a]0ij, tvOupiov tar (a) Aaparpoq Kal Kovpac" avarlQiipi St k[ciI
i!r]([i irXlov t^ireiaa irapa rbv araOpbv rov Vir Ipov t-'£yr\_i)-
pLvov, Aaparpi Kal Kovpa' Aicnroiva, Ipol St
drna- (10)
avarlBijpi Aaparpi Kal Kopq rhv ri). . .