APPENDIX I
Since the greater part of this book was written several publications of Corinthian vases have ap-
peared, and a few unpublished pieces of interest have come to my notice. I append short notes
on these. The most important of the publications is perhaps that of the sanctuary of Demeter
Malophoros at Selinus.
I. E. Gabrici, II Santuario della Malophoros a Selinunte (Mon. Ant. xxxii). On the importance of Selinus,
see above, p. 22.
Corinthian vases and fragments:
p. 311, fig. 129: part of middle Corinthian plate
(cat. no. 1039).
p. 311, fig. 130: part of plate, probably middle
Corinthian; for the style, cf. nos. 831, 835, &c.
p. 312, fig. 131: middle Corinthian kotyle (cf. no.
928 and ff.).
p. 323, fig. 134 a and b: fragments of a Corinthian
crater, classified as Attic. These fragments prob-
ably date from the end of the early Corinthian
period: for the floral chain and the battle-groups,
compare no. 780; the riders, no. 779. I do not
remember seeing these fragments, and Gabrici
does not describe the clay, but I have no doubt at
all that they are Corinthian.
PI. 83, 1: middle Corinthian pyxis (cf. no. 868 and
ff.).
PI. 83, 3: late middle Corinthian phiale (no. 1007:
cf. nos. 945-9, 1004).
PI. 84, 3-4: fragments of late Corinthian kotylai (cf.
nos. 1335-9, and with the latter especially pi. 37,4).
PI. 84, 5: late Corinthian pyxis-lid (cf., for example,
no. 1309).
PI. 84, 6: head from an early sixth-century pyxis (for
the style cf. pi. 47, 14).
PI. 84, 7: late Corinthian pyxis-lid.
Pis. 85, 86 (10): late middle Corinthian pyxis with
plastic busts. The style of the painting is very
close to that shown in pi. 28, 11-12 (both details
of pyxides with plastic heads), but is apparently a
little later. The cross of eight lotus flowers is
unique (for the style, see above on p. 311, fig. 130).
The plastic protomes are cut off at the waist
instead of at the neck or just below the armpits,
and the arms are indicated by painting, not by
modelling: I know of no parallels for these
features. The style is rather poor, but is obviously
related to that of pi. 48, 12.
PI. 86, 1: part of a middle Corinthian bowl (cf. the
earlier nos. 716-17).
PI. 86, 2: early Corinthian or early middle; de-
scribed by Gabrici as part of a vase with double
walls.
PI. 86, 3 : fragment of oinochoe of the same period
(cf. no. 768 a).
PI. 86, 4: middle Corinthian pyxis-lid, by the same
hand as no. 1124 and ff.
PI. 86, 5: middle Corinthian.
PI. 86, 6: see above on pi. 84, 3-4.
PI. 86, 7: no. 1194; Gabrici appears to recognize
neither shape nor subject.
PI. 86,8: fragment of a very fine middle Corinthian
kotyle; for the lotus and palmette compare the
Gorgoneion cups, for the drawing, the kotylai of
the Samos group and the same group of cups.
There is a closely related fragment at Corinth.
PI. 86, 9: no. 1052.
PI. 87, 1-2, 4: early Corinthian alabastra; 2 is
unusual, the forms recalling fig. 58 g.
PI. 87, 3: bottle, probably late Corinthian.
PI. 87, 5: early Corinthian aryballos of the 'warrior
group' (cf. no. 488 and ff.).
PI. 87, 6-7: early or middle Corinthian aryballoi
(group E, no. 564 and ff.).
PI. 87, 8: early Corinthian aryballos: cf. no. 644.
PI. 87, 9: early Corinthian kotyle (debased version
of the type shown in fig. 9 c: cf. no. 191 and p. 23).
PI. 87, 10: early Corinthian (?) aryballos (cf. no.
485 a).
PI. 87, n: early Corinthian oinochoe (cf. no. 758,
though the vase from Selinus is a variant, with
rows of dots).
PI. 87, 12-13: middle Corinthian amphoriskoi.
PI. 88,1: late middle or late Corinthian aryballos (cf.
no. 1250 and ff.)
PI. 88, 2: late Corinthian aryballos (cf. no. 1243 b).
PI. 88, 3: aryballos, perhaps early Corinthian.
PI. 88, 4, 6-7: aryballoi of the 'lion group' (cf. no.
538 and ff.); 4 is no. 553; 7 is no 549.
PI. 88,8-10: late Corinthian aryballoi (cf. nos. 1244,
1263).
PI. 88, 11: late Corinthian alabastron (cf. no. 1204).
PI. 88, 12: aryballos: see nos. 559-60.
PI. 89, 1: see above on fig. 129.
PI. 89, 2, 2a, 4-5, 7: fragments of middle or late
Corinthian kotylai (cf. no. 965 and ff.).
Since the greater part of this book was written several publications of Corinthian vases have ap-
peared, and a few unpublished pieces of interest have come to my notice. I append short notes
on these. The most important of the publications is perhaps that of the sanctuary of Demeter
Malophoros at Selinus.
I. E. Gabrici, II Santuario della Malophoros a Selinunte (Mon. Ant. xxxii). On the importance of Selinus,
see above, p. 22.
Corinthian vases and fragments:
p. 311, fig. 129: part of middle Corinthian plate
(cat. no. 1039).
p. 311, fig. 130: part of plate, probably middle
Corinthian; for the style, cf. nos. 831, 835, &c.
p. 312, fig. 131: middle Corinthian kotyle (cf. no.
928 and ff.).
p. 323, fig. 134 a and b: fragments of a Corinthian
crater, classified as Attic. These fragments prob-
ably date from the end of the early Corinthian
period: for the floral chain and the battle-groups,
compare no. 780; the riders, no. 779. I do not
remember seeing these fragments, and Gabrici
does not describe the clay, but I have no doubt at
all that they are Corinthian.
PI. 83, 1: middle Corinthian pyxis (cf. no. 868 and
ff.).
PI. 83, 3: late middle Corinthian phiale (no. 1007:
cf. nos. 945-9, 1004).
PI. 84, 3-4: fragments of late Corinthian kotylai (cf.
nos. 1335-9, and with the latter especially pi. 37,4).
PI. 84, 5: late Corinthian pyxis-lid (cf., for example,
no. 1309).
PI. 84, 6: head from an early sixth-century pyxis (for
the style cf. pi. 47, 14).
PI. 84, 7: late Corinthian pyxis-lid.
Pis. 85, 86 (10): late middle Corinthian pyxis with
plastic busts. The style of the painting is very
close to that shown in pi. 28, 11-12 (both details
of pyxides with plastic heads), but is apparently a
little later. The cross of eight lotus flowers is
unique (for the style, see above on p. 311, fig. 130).
The plastic protomes are cut off at the waist
instead of at the neck or just below the armpits,
and the arms are indicated by painting, not by
modelling: I know of no parallels for these
features. The style is rather poor, but is obviously
related to that of pi. 48, 12.
PI. 86, 1: part of a middle Corinthian bowl (cf. the
earlier nos. 716-17).
PI. 86, 2: early Corinthian or early middle; de-
scribed by Gabrici as part of a vase with double
walls.
PI. 86, 3 : fragment of oinochoe of the same period
(cf. no. 768 a).
PI. 86, 4: middle Corinthian pyxis-lid, by the same
hand as no. 1124 and ff.
PI. 86, 5: middle Corinthian.
PI. 86, 6: see above on pi. 84, 3-4.
PI. 86, 7: no. 1194; Gabrici appears to recognize
neither shape nor subject.
PI. 86,8: fragment of a very fine middle Corinthian
kotyle; for the lotus and palmette compare the
Gorgoneion cups, for the drawing, the kotylai of
the Samos group and the same group of cups.
There is a closely related fragment at Corinth.
PI. 86, 9: no. 1052.
PI. 87, 1-2, 4: early Corinthian alabastra; 2 is
unusual, the forms recalling fig. 58 g.
PI. 87, 3: bottle, probably late Corinthian.
PI. 87, 5: early Corinthian aryballos of the 'warrior
group' (cf. no. 488 and ff.).
PI. 87, 6-7: early or middle Corinthian aryballoi
(group E, no. 564 and ff.).
PI. 87, 8: early Corinthian aryballos: cf. no. 644.
PI. 87, 9: early Corinthian kotyle (debased version
of the type shown in fig. 9 c: cf. no. 191 and p. 23).
PI. 87, 10: early Corinthian (?) aryballos (cf. no.
485 a).
PI. 87, n: early Corinthian oinochoe (cf. no. 758,
though the vase from Selinus is a variant, with
rows of dots).
PI. 87, 12-13: middle Corinthian amphoriskoi.
PI. 88,1: late middle or late Corinthian aryballos (cf.
no. 1250 and ff.)
PI. 88, 2: late Corinthian aryballos (cf. no. 1243 b).
PI. 88, 3: aryballos, perhaps early Corinthian.
PI. 88, 4, 6-7: aryballoi of the 'lion group' (cf. no.
538 and ff.); 4 is no. 553; 7 is no 549.
PI. 88,8-10: late Corinthian aryballoi (cf. nos. 1244,
1263).
PI. 88, 11: late Corinthian alabastron (cf. no. 1204).
PI. 88, 12: aryballos: see nos. 559-60.
PI. 89, 1: see above on fig. 129.
PI. 89, 2, 2a, 4-5, 7: fragments of middle or late
Corinthian kotylai (cf. no. 965 and ff.).