Universitätsbibliothek HeidelbergUniversitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Metadaten

Ramsay, William Mitchell
The cities and bishoprics of Phrygia: being an essay of the local history of Phrygia from the earliest time to the Turkish conquest (Band 1,2): West and West-Central Phrygia — Oxford, 1897

DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.4680#0149

DWork-Logo
Overview
Facsimile
0.5
1 cm
facsimile
Scroll
OCR fulltext
48o XI. APAMEIA.

menos (no. 357), both given in Pape. The palmettes inserted so often
are perhaps a Chr. symbol, see no. 465 and § 2. See p. 493.
The date by letters without erovs occurs no. 646, not far away.

351. Bey-Keui. MM. Legrand and Chamonard BCH 1893 p. 355.
Avp. Kvptov Aap[d\ov ?] <Pp6vT(ov to his wife Domna and children :

Fine to tameion [a](p'. eyevero en rub', /x(jjzn) a (a.d. 239).

352. (R. 1888). At the top of the steep slope leading up from
Tchapali two miles beyond Bunar-Bashi (Fontes Aurocreni) on the road
from Apameia to Apollonia : boundary stone of Apollonia in the form of
a dedication ©eois ['E]vopiois on behalf of Hadrian a.d. 135 (text Hist.
Geoffr. p. 172), marking at the same time the limits of the province Asia
and of Apamean territory. I once thought that no. 164 may mark the
limit of Asia (and of Apameia) on SE., but more probably it is the limit
between an imperial estate and the territory of Konana.

APPENDIX III.

ATJROKRA.

Aurokea is mentioned as a bishopric in several Notitiae: in I, VII,
VIII, IX and in De Boor's Notitia it is called Aurokla, at Concil. Chalced.
a.d. 451 Aulokra and Aurokra, and in Hierocles AvpanXaa1. Wesseling
recognized that the name which appears in these various forms must be
the noun from which was derived the adjectival form Aulokrene; and
this seems so obvious that I should have assumed it without a word, had
not M. Radet disputed it. He identifies Aurakleia-Aurokla with Akroe-
nos 2; but I doubt whether any philologist will follow him in identifying
two names so different in character. The essential element in AvpoKka
cannot be compared by any reasonable philological process with that in
'kKpo-r)vos (where --qvos is the widely spread adjectival suffix). .

1 So Parthey: AipaxWa Burckhardt: 2 II est evident qu' AvpaKkeia est 'A*po-

6 kvpoiikav Notitiae: 6 AipoKpav and rjvos, see his En Phri/gie p. 118. I regret

AvXoKpav Cone. Chalc.: rrjs AvpoKkeov to have to differ so widely from M. Radet

7rdXf<»f Cone. Const, a. d. 448. Hierocles in topographical questions (but I can

probably deduces AipaxXeta from the at least admire and agree with him in

entry in his authority 6 AipoKXewv {irri- historical questions) : his topography

ctkotvos). Similar wrong inferences are is founded on principles which are often

his Bpidva (6 Bpiavav). in contradiction with mine, and Aurokla
 
Annotationen