DOI Seite / Zitierlink:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.4680#0467
Hinweis: Dies ist eine zusätzlich gescannte Seite, um Farbkeil und Maßstab abbilden zu können.
0.5
1 cm
NOTES ON PART II.
791
and exercised wide influence in N.E. Phrygia, which (as is proved in
Ch. XVII § 3, XII § 10) was not much affected by Chr. influence until
after 300. The memorials of Epitynchanos are connected with two
great religious centres, one at or near Akmonia (where he was high-
priest), the other at the kieron of the Praipenisseis (situated at Kara-
Agatch-Euren, a little W. of Doghan-Arslan, beside the late Bishopric
Spore JHS 1884 p. 259, 1887 p. 512, Hist. Geogr. p. 145).
4. Zahn in Ilealencyhl. f. prot. Tkeol., s> v. Avercius, takes the name as
Celtic (quoting the proof from N. 7c. Z. 1895 p. 871, which I cannot
consult at present). The thought occurred to me many years ago (for
the name occurs in two Latin inscr. of Gaul); but a high authority,
whom I consulted, pronounced it not to be Celtic. I have therefore
taken it as Italic (C/i. in TL. E. p. 440), but welcome the Celtic origin.
5. P. 606. The stone on which no. 495 has been engraved has been
carried to Smyrna to be sold (its origin being concealed) \ A new copy
is published in BCH 1895 p. S54=r
that the inscr. has been previoiE.
confirms MM. Legrand and Cht
occur, in which he is probably rig E 5^1(1^^
Line 2 ]ira pir\ '661 <="pj ^**»V^
5 IJ-€Tijopov Oi)^yVjJ.iVoi TTtp E
16 O marked doubtfulljE-
(required for my te =-^
18 ]os kcu (confirming M, E.
Tiarjos). 20 E r
The alteration of text, which I -
expedient in 12, is now proved toE _
p. 479 M. Weil reads
fs SHE*
CO? KO.L —
12 Mpov] ttcu(s), cnrovBf] nE—
avdp]d>TTOis. =-
In 15, M. Weil takes the samfE-t
as imperfect of xp<*<° J ^ut he alto E_
Xpia as a false form, imitating th E <o
In 20, he takes l(pei\a.To for ec/>i/\E
has considerable similarity to miE
he gives nothing in lines 1-11 an —
CO
6
o
1 Compare the remarks on p. 366 (wi =-?
note 1).
c
o
O
>
6
06
i-
D
O
o
O
E E
= o
791
and exercised wide influence in N.E. Phrygia, which (as is proved in
Ch. XVII § 3, XII § 10) was not much affected by Chr. influence until
after 300. The memorials of Epitynchanos are connected with two
great religious centres, one at or near Akmonia (where he was high-
priest), the other at the kieron of the Praipenisseis (situated at Kara-
Agatch-Euren, a little W. of Doghan-Arslan, beside the late Bishopric
Spore JHS 1884 p. 259, 1887 p. 512, Hist. Geogr. p. 145).
4. Zahn in Ilealencyhl. f. prot. Tkeol., s> v. Avercius, takes the name as
Celtic (quoting the proof from N. 7c. Z. 1895 p. 871, which I cannot
consult at present). The thought occurred to me many years ago (for
the name occurs in two Latin inscr. of Gaul); but a high authority,
whom I consulted, pronounced it not to be Celtic. I have therefore
taken it as Italic (C/i. in TL. E. p. 440), but welcome the Celtic origin.
5. P. 606. The stone on which no. 495 has been engraved has been
carried to Smyrna to be sold (its origin being concealed) \ A new copy
is published in BCH 1895 p. S54=r
that the inscr. has been previoiE.
confirms MM. Legrand and Cht
occur, in which he is probably rig E 5^1(1^^
Line 2 ]ira pir\ '661 <="pj ^**»V^
5 IJ-€Tijopov Oi)^yVjJ.iVoi TTtp E
16 O marked doubtfulljE-
(required for my te =-^
18 ]os kcu (confirming M, E.
Tiarjos). 20 E r
The alteration of text, which I -
expedient in 12, is now proved toE _
p. 479 M. Weil reads
fs SHE*
CO? KO.L —
12 Mpov] ttcu(s), cnrovBf] nE—
avdp]d>TTOis. =-
In 15, M. Weil takes the samfE-t
as imperfect of xp<*<° J ^ut he alto E_
Xpia as a false form, imitating th E <o
In 20, he takes l(pei\a.To for ec/>i/\E
has considerable similarity to miE
he gives nothing in lines 1-11 an —
CO
6
o
1 Compare the remarks on p. 366 (wi =-?
note 1).
c
o
O
>
6
06
i-
D
O
o
O
E E
= o