DOI Seite / Zitierlink:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.39769#0017
CONTENTS.
Vll
Apastamba—Siromani—Dar\yi hotna—reason does not invalidate
the Vidhi—Padarttha Prabalya—Savara Swami’s view oij the
Sutras—Kumarila’s view ,of the Sutra^ different from that Of
Savara—Rameswara Suri explains the difference—Kumarila’s
view of the 7th Sutra —it establishes the validity’ of usa^e—
conscious-satisfaction is not the o'ply test of validity of usage-
usage is valid if recommended somewhere,—non-condemnation
by the wise »gives validity to usage—Colebrooke on the Adhi *
karana—what is condemnation by the Sruti or Smfiti—doctrines
of Factum valet and vox populi—Rule 5. — mat'ters sanctioned by
• * » >
the Shastras should have preference—verbal usages—conflict
between two usages—Rulo 7. Usage or Smriti must be’reduced
> to the short, simple and general form of a Vedic Vidhi— Holaka
maxim—Sutras relating to the maxim—conclusion—the Vidhi
is general though custom is local—the Hdlaka maxim reflates to
religious ceremonies—Mimansakas recognise loc^l or tribal
customs in case of worldly ’ matters but’not in case of religious
matters—Jaimini speaks of only approved usages but Manu
enumerates all sorts of usages—the Brahma marriage prevails
and the others mostly disappeared —very little foreign influence
at the time of Savara - Kumarila condemns foreign usage—
foreign usages when valid—two other Adhikaranas—preference
of Sanskrit words in interpreting popular sayings—-the word^
to be understood in their general sense-1 Akriti and Vyakti-y
three striking points. ... ... ... pp. 223-266.
LECTURE V.
1
The Mimansa Nyayas or the specific principles of
Mimansa called Nyayas (Maxims).
Section I. Introduction to the topic :—
Nyayas ’ resemble headnotes—Maxmuller’s analysis » of a
Nyaya—knowledge of general principles is indispensible—Leading
Vll
Apastamba—Siromani—Dar\yi hotna—reason does not invalidate
the Vidhi—Padarttha Prabalya—Savara Swami’s view oij the
Sutras—Kumarila’s view ,of the Sutra^ different from that Of
Savara—Rameswara Suri explains the difference—Kumarila’s
view of the 7th Sutra —it establishes the validity’ of usa^e—
conscious-satisfaction is not the o'ply test of validity of usage-
usage is valid if recommended somewhere,—non-condemnation
by the wise »gives validity to usage—Colebrooke on the Adhi *
karana—what is condemnation by the Sruti or Smfiti—doctrines
of Factum valet and vox populi—Rule 5. — mat'ters sanctioned by
• * » >
the Shastras should have preference—verbal usages—conflict
between two usages—Rulo 7. Usage or Smriti must be’reduced
> to the short, simple and general form of a Vedic Vidhi— Holaka
maxim—Sutras relating to the maxim—conclusion—the Vidhi
is general though custom is local—the Hdlaka maxim reflates to
religious ceremonies—Mimansakas recognise loc^l or tribal
customs in case of worldly ’ matters but’not in case of religious
matters—Jaimini speaks of only approved usages but Manu
enumerates all sorts of usages—the Brahma marriage prevails
and the others mostly disappeared —very little foreign influence
at the time of Savara - Kumarila condemns foreign usage—
foreign usages when valid—two other Adhikaranas—preference
of Sanskrit words in interpreting popular sayings—-the word^
to be understood in their general sense-1 Akriti and Vyakti-y
three striking points. ... ... ... pp. 223-266.
LECTURE V.
1
The Mimansa Nyayas or the specific principles of
Mimansa called Nyayas (Maxims).
Section I. Introduction to the topic :—
Nyayas ’ resemble headnotes—Maxmuller’s analysis » of a
Nyaya—knowledge of general principles is indispensible—Leading