74
CATALOGUE OF SCULPTTJEE.
(8) Ckoiseul-Gouffier, Voyage pittoresque, i., p. 158,
pi. 98 (1782).
(9) Genelli, in Eode's Vitruvius, vignette (1800-1).
(10) Marquez, in Guattani, Mem. Encic, v., p. 131
(1810?).
(11) Hirt, Gesch. d. Baulcunst hei d. Alien, ii., p. 70,
pi. 10, figs. 14 a, b (1823).
(12) Canina, Architettura Greca, iii., p. 103, pi. 158
(1834).
(13) Weinbrenner, quoted by Stark, Vortraege, p. 471.
(14) Quatrcmere de Quincy, Becueil de Dissertations
Arclieologiques (1836) quoted by Stark, I.e.
(15) Leake, Trans, of B. Soc. Lit., 2nd Ser., ii., p. 44.
(16) Cockerell (Class. Museum, v., p. 193, and plate ;
Arch. Zeit, 1847, pi. 12 ; Mus. of Class. Antiq. i., p. 164),
working from the dimensions of the frieze, produced a
plan with 8 columns, doubled, on the long sides, and
6 columns, single at the ends. This was modified by
"Watkiss Lloyd, who made the columns double on all
sides, being 7 and 6 respectively in number (Arch. Zeit.,
1848, p. 81*; Mus. of Class. Antiq., i., p. 164). The
arrangement was accepted by Cockerell in a later restora-
tion (1856), which was published by Goodchild (see
below). It is also embodied in the small model shown
in the Mausoleum Eoom, and was further developed in
the drawing by F. Cockerell exhibited in the Mausoleum
Eoom (Plate XIV.; published in Builder, 29th August,
1896).
(17) Texier, Asie Mineure, iii., p. 121; cf. Mus. of Class.
Antiq., i., p. 158.
(18) Fergusson, Hist. Inquiry into the True Principles of
Beauty in Art (1849), p. 321; cf. Mus. of Class. Antiq., i.,
p. 161.
(19) Falkener, Mus. of Class. Antiq., i., p. 165, and
plate.
CATALOGUE OF SCULPTTJEE.
(8) Ckoiseul-Gouffier, Voyage pittoresque, i., p. 158,
pi. 98 (1782).
(9) Genelli, in Eode's Vitruvius, vignette (1800-1).
(10) Marquez, in Guattani, Mem. Encic, v., p. 131
(1810?).
(11) Hirt, Gesch. d. Baulcunst hei d. Alien, ii., p. 70,
pi. 10, figs. 14 a, b (1823).
(12) Canina, Architettura Greca, iii., p. 103, pi. 158
(1834).
(13) Weinbrenner, quoted by Stark, Vortraege, p. 471.
(14) Quatrcmere de Quincy, Becueil de Dissertations
Arclieologiques (1836) quoted by Stark, I.e.
(15) Leake, Trans, of B. Soc. Lit., 2nd Ser., ii., p. 44.
(16) Cockerell (Class. Museum, v., p. 193, and plate ;
Arch. Zeit, 1847, pi. 12 ; Mus. of Class. Antiq. i., p. 164),
working from the dimensions of the frieze, produced a
plan with 8 columns, doubled, on the long sides, and
6 columns, single at the ends. This was modified by
"Watkiss Lloyd, who made the columns double on all
sides, being 7 and 6 respectively in number (Arch. Zeit.,
1848, p. 81*; Mus. of Class. Antiq., i., p. 164). The
arrangement was accepted by Cockerell in a later restora-
tion (1856), which was published by Goodchild (see
below). It is also embodied in the small model shown
in the Mausoleum Eoom, and was further developed in
the drawing by F. Cockerell exhibited in the Mausoleum
Eoom (Plate XIV.; published in Builder, 29th August,
1896).
(17) Texier, Asie Mineure, iii., p. 121; cf. Mus. of Class.
Antiq., i., p. 158.
(18) Fergusson, Hist. Inquiry into the True Principles of
Beauty in Art (1849), p. 321; cf. Mus. of Class. Antiq., i.,
p. 161.
(19) Falkener, Mus. of Class. Antiq., i., p. 165, and
plate.