DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.31854#0016
10
BIBLIOGRAPIIIE CRITIQUE DE LUCAS CRANACIl
(The writers quoted in the following' entries —Schmidt, Schmid, Fried-
lander, Rieifel, Woermann, J 899 — discuss a special group of pictures,
especially two dated 1503, attributed variously to Griinewald, Cranach
or Huber).
Schmidt (Wilhelm), Varia. II. Griinewald (Repertorium f. Kunst-
wissenschaft, 1889, XII, 39).
Schmidt (Wilhelm', Wolf Huher und M. Griinewald (Zeitschrift
fiir Bildende Kunst, 1892, N. F., III, 116).
Sciimid (Heinrich-Alfred), Matliias Grunewald (Festbuch zur
Eroffnung' des Idist. Museums, Basel, 1894, p. 87).
Friedlander (Max J.), x\ review of the last-named work. (Repert.
f. Kunstwissenschaft, XVII, 471).
Rieffel (Franz), Kleine Kunstwissenschaftliche Controversfracjen
(Repertorium f. Kunstwissenschaft, 1895, XVIII, 424-428, esp.
427).
The writer denies the separate existence of a « Pseudo-Grunewald ».
See also the same writer in Zeitschrift fiir Christl. Kunst, 1897, X. Sp.
170.
Schmidt (Wilhelm), Notizen zu cleutschen Malern. 3. Wolf Huher
(Repertorium f. Kunstw., 1896, XIX, 287).
Friedlander (Max J.), Die Cranach-Ausstelluncj (Repertorium f.
Kunstw., 1899, XXII, 248).
Wokrmann (Karl), Die Dresdner Cranach-Ausstellung (Zeitschrift
f. Bild. Kunst. 1899. N. F. XI, 27-28).
The writer rejects the attribution of the pictures in question to Cra-
nach.
Woermann (Karl), Die Cranach-Ausstellung (Dresden 1899) und
clie Pseudo-Griinewalcl-Frage (Kunstchronik, 1898, N. F, X, 145).
An article written four months before the opening of the exhibition, dis-
cussing the aims and prospects of the latter, and giving a resume of the
literature bearing on the « Pseudo-Griinewald » question, a question
which it was hoped the exibition would help to solve.
Rieffel (Franz), Zur Lehre von der « Aschaffenhui ger Schule ».
(Kunstchronik, 1899, N. F. X, Sp. 257).
The writer is of opinion that the importance of the so-called Aschaf-
•fenburg School, and in particular of Simon von Aschaffenburg, the
BIBLIOGRAPIIIE CRITIQUE DE LUCAS CRANACIl
(The writers quoted in the following' entries —Schmidt, Schmid, Fried-
lander, Rieifel, Woermann, J 899 — discuss a special group of pictures,
especially two dated 1503, attributed variously to Griinewald, Cranach
or Huber).
Schmidt (Wilhelm), Varia. II. Griinewald (Repertorium f. Kunst-
wissenschaft, 1889, XII, 39).
Schmidt (Wilhelm', Wolf Huher und M. Griinewald (Zeitschrift
fiir Bildende Kunst, 1892, N. F., III, 116).
Sciimid (Heinrich-Alfred), Matliias Grunewald (Festbuch zur
Eroffnung' des Idist. Museums, Basel, 1894, p. 87).
Friedlander (Max J.), x\ review of the last-named work. (Repert.
f. Kunstwissenschaft, XVII, 471).
Rieffel (Franz), Kleine Kunstwissenschaftliche Controversfracjen
(Repertorium f. Kunstwissenschaft, 1895, XVIII, 424-428, esp.
427).
The writer denies the separate existence of a « Pseudo-Grunewald ».
See also the same writer in Zeitschrift fiir Christl. Kunst, 1897, X. Sp.
170.
Schmidt (Wilhelm), Notizen zu cleutschen Malern. 3. Wolf Huher
(Repertorium f. Kunstw., 1896, XIX, 287).
Friedlander (Max J.), Die Cranach-Ausstelluncj (Repertorium f.
Kunstw., 1899, XXII, 248).
Wokrmann (Karl), Die Dresdner Cranach-Ausstellung (Zeitschrift
f. Bild. Kunst. 1899. N. F. XI, 27-28).
The writer rejects the attribution of the pictures in question to Cra-
nach.
Woermann (Karl), Die Cranach-Ausstellung (Dresden 1899) und
clie Pseudo-Griinewalcl-Frage (Kunstchronik, 1898, N. F, X, 145).
An article written four months before the opening of the exhibition, dis-
cussing the aims and prospects of the latter, and giving a resume of the
literature bearing on the « Pseudo-Griinewald » question, a question
which it was hoped the exibition would help to solve.
Rieffel (Franz), Zur Lehre von der « Aschaffenhui ger Schule ».
(Kunstchronik, 1899, N. F. X, Sp. 257).
The writer is of opinion that the importance of the so-called Aschaf-
•fenburg School, and in particular of Simon von Aschaffenburg, the