Universitätsbibliothek HeidelbergUniversitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Metadaten

Polska Akademia Umieje̜tności <Krakau> / Komisja Historii Sztuki [Hrsg.]; Polska Akademia Nauk <Warschau> / Oddział <Krakau> / Komisja Teorii i Historii Sztuki [Hrsg.]
Folia Historiae Artium — NS: 15.2017

DOI Artikel:
Krasny, Piotr: Exempla viva: the prelates of the Roman Catholic Church as inspirers of Charles Borromeo’s instructions on shaping sacred srt
DOI Seite / Zitierlink: 
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.38234#0044
Überblick
loading ...
Faksimile
0.5
1 cm
facsimile
Vollansicht
OCR-Volltext
43

was to ensure a consistency of his subsequent directives
and decisions in the matters of art. Such an interpretation
of theoretical regulations contained in the Instructiones
seems to be confirmed by the actual deeds of Borromeo
who, during his episcopate in Milan, always collaborated
with Pellegrino Tibaldi (1527-1596), engaging him, for ex-
ample, to participate in teams conducting canonical visi-
tations. But, above all, he consistently commissioned him
to erect churches52 which, as attested by Giussano, served
as exemplary solutions which represented the church
types described in the decrees of the synod of 1565 and in
the Instructiones.53 It is impossible to determine the extent
of Tibaldis contribution in the latter work, but there can
be no doubt that, through his architectural work, he en-
sured the compatibility of the archbishops ‘theory of art’
with the actual products of his artistic patronage. There-
fore, it has been repeatedly emphasised in the literature
that, by permanently engaging this outstanding architect,
by making him familiar with the most intricate aspects of
sacred art, and by assuring him a very high standing in his
milieu, Borromeo indicated a successful model of achiev-
ing artistic solutions that strictly conformed to the needs
of the Church in the period of its renewal after the Coun-
cil of Trent.54 Significantly less attention has been devoted
to similar actions of prelates who, while trying to improve
the religious life in north-Italian dioceses in the first half
of the sixteenth century, resorted to comparable means in
order to deploy the talents of Giulio Romano (1499-1546)
in the effort of cementing their reforms.

52 S. Scotti, ‘L’architettura e riforma cattolica nella Milano di Carlo
Borromeo’, IlArte, 5, 1972, pp. 54-90; S. Della Torre, R. Scho-
lield, Pellegrino Tibaldi architetto e il San Fedele in Milano. In-
venzione e construzione di una chiesa essemplare, Milan, 1984,
passim-, J. Ackerman, ‘Pellegrino Tibaldi, san Carlo Borromeo
e l’architettura ecclesiastica di loro tempo’, in San Carlo e il suo
tempo, voi. 2, Rome, 1986, pp. 573-586; M.L. Gatti Perer, ‘Le
opere e i giorni. Pellegrino Pellegrini detto II Tibaldi e il rinnova-
mento dell’arte cristiana’, Arte Lombarda, serie nuova 93-94,1990,
pp. 7-11; R. Haslam, ‘Pellegrino Pellegrini, Carlo Borromeo and
Public Architecture of the Counter-Reformation’, ibidem, pp. 17-
-30; A. Rovetta, ‘Pellegrino Tibaldi e l’idea del Tempio San Se-
bastiano’, ibidem, pp. 105-110; D. Moor, Pellegrino Tibaldis Chur-
ch of San Fedele in Milan. The Jesuits, Carlo Borromeo and Reli-
gious Architecture of the Late Sixteenth Century, Ann Arbor, 1989,
passim-, J. Alexander, From Renaissance to Counter-Reforma-
tion, pp. 217-225 (as in note 6).
53 G.P. Giussano, Vita di S. Carlo Borromeo prete cardinale del tito-
lo di Santa Prassede arcivescovo di Milano, Rome, 1610, pp. 91-94,
624-629,471-472. See also A. Scotti Tosini, ‘La “bella maniera”:
architetti, committenti, teoria e forma dell’architettura tra Roma
e Milano nel Cinquecento’, in Lombardia manierista. Arti e archi-
tettura 1535-1600, ed. by M.T. Fiorio, V. Terrarob, Milan, 2009,
pp. 87-88.
54 Apart from the works cited in note 52, see in particular: E.C. Vo-
ELKER, ‘Borromeo’s Influence on Sacred Art and Architecture’, in
San Carlo Borromeo. Catholic Reform, pp. 122-187 (as in note 5).


8. Chancel of Verona Cathedral arranged by Giulio Romano, Miche-
le Sanmicheli and Francesco Torbido, after 1531. Photo: P. Krasny
The artist met Giberti, who was then at the head of
the Apostolic Datary, at the beginning of the 1520s, while
working in the Vatican Palace. The prelate not only or-
dered a few paintings from Giulio55, but also, as noted
by Giorgio Vasari (1511-1574), considered him ‘his very
familiar friend’.56 Their friendship bore fruit in the form
of an important commission only after 1531, when Gib-
erti received a bequest of the bishop of Bayeux, Lodovico
di Canossa (1476-1532), intended for the erection of his
tomb chapel at the cathedral of Verona. Having obtained
permission from Pope Paul III to use the money for a new
arrangement of the chancel of the cathedral (where, in
the tomb of the bishops of Verona, he had buried Canos-
sa), the cardinal called Giulio57 to be his advisor while the

55 M. Tafuri, ‘Giulio Romano: linguaggio, mentalità, committenti’,
in Giulio Romano, ed. by S. Polano, Milan, 2001, p. 18; C.L. From-
mel, ‘Gian Matteo Giberi e Giulio Romano’, in Gian Matteo Gi-
berti, pp. 131-134 (as in note 25).
56 ‘suo domestico amico’, G. Vasari, Le Vite de’ più eccellenti pitto-
ri, scultori e architettori, ed. by G. Milanesi, voi. 5, Florence, 1880,
p. 532. English translation after: G. Vasari, Lives of the most Emi-
nent Painters, Sculptors and Architects, trans, by G. du C. de Vere,
vol. 6, London, 1913, p. 151. See also C.L. Frommel, ‘Gian Matteo
Giberi’, p. 131 (as in note 55).
57 M. Laskin, ‘Giulio Romano and the Cathedral of Verona’, in Es-
says in Honour of Walter Friedländer, ed. by W. Cahn, New York,
1965, p. 111; A. Serafini, ‘Gian Matteo Giberti e il Duomo di Ve-
rona. 1: il programma, il contesto’, Venezia Cinquecento, 6, 1998,
 
Annotationen