Melanchthon, Philipp; Platner, Tilemann [Oth.]; Zuseler, Wessel [Oth.]: Theologicæ Hypotyposes (VVittembergæ, 1523) [VD16 M 3597]

ibitf I
wb |
jiilW
iKturife I

1
Mi
W/
m >
W®i
:-3
*
H»!
Mfflfc
Mffl
pjrai

L-EG ISi FO.XCVIL
Imentu uetus,& uelut obsignaretur.Ita san<*
guisChristi,signaculuest testamenti noui,
DE LEGIS ABROgatione
QV OMChristus nouu testamentu
uocat,nodubiuest,quin uetus illud
antiquarii, & abrogatu uclit. Sic .n,
argumentar au&orEpistolae ad Hebraeos,
cx Hieremiaeuerbis,qu3e paulo ante citaui
m9,dicedo,nouuantiquauitprius,cap.viq
Et uelex hisadparer, quarum intersit,inter
JViosen & Christu,inter lege St Euangelia,
Mosesueteristestamenti, hoc est, legis mi^
nister erat Christus noui testameti,no legis
quide, naeaia antea promulgata erat,
nisterioMosijledremissionis peccatorum,
Proinde,noeEuageliu,utscholallicisenle
rut,id qd* lex,led plane remissio peccatorii»
ctipsiirimaablolutio, utuocanr.
Supra lege in tres partes distinximus, In
formasmorujceremoniaruSCiudiciorum,
iQuas oes necesse e abrogatas ee,si uet9testi
metu antiquatu e.Qu jras igi t,nu occidere,
mcechanliceat.Siquidelex,insoliduabrc>
gataestnouotestameto.Sic&apudPaulu
qujrit Si rio sum9 sub lege ergo peccabim’
, Respodco? Hic abrogads legis caussa,