probably in order to unambiguously indicate the syllabic nature of the sonorant.328 For
example the Sahidic predecessor of qni.t (qinVjtV) "to be fat" is written SKMN6, which is
probably to be interpreted as /'kna/. Instead, a writing *KN€ would suggest a pronuncia-
tion /'kne/. Bohairic has bK€MI which may have been pronounced f'koni] or ['keni] but has
probably been derived from earlier */'kni/. In Akhmimic, an additional consonant /j/ is
preserved in this word which makes doubling of the sonorant letter unneccessary: aKN£ie
/'knja/. Consider the following examples:
Egyptian
etymon
gloss
Classical
Sahidic
Akhmimic
Bohairic
Fayyumic
6
sb.t
to circumcize
ceee
CBB6
cefii
CHBBl
A
sml
to accuse
CAME
CAME
ceAi
CHAAI
N
qni.t
to be fat
KNN£
Ki-teie, KNMie
K6NI
KHMNI
\
qfr.t
door-bolt
KMe
-
KeM
KHJAl, K7TM
P
brj
to be new
Bppe
Bppe
Bepi
Bepi
5.10.4 Unstressed syllabic sonorants before consonants and in word-
final position
Syllabic sonorants can also occur in unstressed syllables but their status is quite
different here. They are mere positional variants of sonorants and not related to an
original i]ow.
It may be assumed that sonorants were generally pronounced syllabically when not
adjacent to a vowel. While verbs like H(J?idv2 /'Jlah/ "to be afraid" and sC(uTn /'sotp/ "to
choose" were probably pronounced as monosyllables (US' § 2.7.5), Sahidic verbs such as
SAK&2 "to be sad" and sCu)TA "to listen", which belong to the same morphological
classes as the above-mentioned verbs, may have been pronounced as disyllabics: /m'kah/,
/ sotm/, although this is by no means certain.
Sahidic has two forms of the definite article, a long form ()!£-) which appears before
consonant clusters, and a short form (FI-) which appears elsewhere. With nouns such as
pne "temple", both forms are attested: sne-pne ~ sn-pne,3*9 so no easy decision is
possible as to whether the initial sonorant was perceived as a consonant or as a vowel.
Unstressed syllabic sonorants also occur in Bohairic and Fayyumic where stressed
syllabic sonorants are unknown (or at least concealed on the graphic surface). However
in Bohairic (I leave aside Fayyumic here), only A and N can be written syllabically,
which, furthermore, is only encountered in word-initial position. In all other cases, the
328 Thus Sethe (1918). Hodge (1981) gives a different interpretation assuming that the
written sequence of two sonorants is a device for rendering a sequence /?/ +
sonorant in the spoken language.
329 Depuydt (1993: 350, 367f.). Depuydt states that "nepne is standard in good
manuscripts" (p. 367).
265
example the Sahidic predecessor of qni.t (qinVjtV) "to be fat" is written SKMN6, which is
probably to be interpreted as /'kna/. Instead, a writing *KN€ would suggest a pronuncia-
tion /'kne/. Bohairic has bK€MI which may have been pronounced f'koni] or ['keni] but has
probably been derived from earlier */'kni/. In Akhmimic, an additional consonant /j/ is
preserved in this word which makes doubling of the sonorant letter unneccessary: aKN£ie
/'knja/. Consider the following examples:
Egyptian
etymon
gloss
Classical
Sahidic
Akhmimic
Bohairic
Fayyumic
6
sb.t
to circumcize
ceee
CBB6
cefii
CHBBl
A
sml
to accuse
CAME
CAME
ceAi
CHAAI
N
qni.t
to be fat
KNN£
Ki-teie, KNMie
K6NI
KHMNI
\
qfr.t
door-bolt
KMe
-
KeM
KHJAl, K7TM
P
brj
to be new
Bppe
Bppe
Bepi
Bepi
5.10.4 Unstressed syllabic sonorants before consonants and in word-
final position
Syllabic sonorants can also occur in unstressed syllables but their status is quite
different here. They are mere positional variants of sonorants and not related to an
original i]ow.
It may be assumed that sonorants were generally pronounced syllabically when not
adjacent to a vowel. While verbs like H(J?idv2 /'Jlah/ "to be afraid" and sC(uTn /'sotp/ "to
choose" were probably pronounced as monosyllables (US' § 2.7.5), Sahidic verbs such as
SAK&2 "to be sad" and sCu)TA "to listen", which belong to the same morphological
classes as the above-mentioned verbs, may have been pronounced as disyllabics: /m'kah/,
/ sotm/, although this is by no means certain.
Sahidic has two forms of the definite article, a long form ()!£-) which appears before
consonant clusters, and a short form (FI-) which appears elsewhere. With nouns such as
pne "temple", both forms are attested: sne-pne ~ sn-pne,3*9 so no easy decision is
possible as to whether the initial sonorant was perceived as a consonant or as a vowel.
Unstressed syllabic sonorants also occur in Bohairic and Fayyumic where stressed
syllabic sonorants are unknown (or at least concealed on the graphic surface). However
in Bohairic (I leave aside Fayyumic here), only A and N can be written syllabically,
which, furthermore, is only encountered in word-initial position. In all other cases, the
328 Thus Sethe (1918). Hodge (1981) gives a different interpretation assuming that the
written sequence of two sonorants is a device for rendering a sequence /?/ +
sonorant in the spoken language.
329 Depuydt (1993: 350, 367f.). Depuydt states that "nepne is standard in good
manuscripts" (p. 367).
265