t 4°6 J
tion of the art, fhould the horfes of Ra-
phaeljGiulio Romano, Polidore, N. Pouffin>
tlieforms and charaflers of which, fuchgreat
artifis had ftudied with almoft the fame
attention as thofe of the human figure ; in
which too (as in the human- figure) they
had corredted the defedts of common na-
ture from their own exalted ideas of beau-
ty, and from thofe of their great models the
ancient fculptors ; and in which they cer-
tainiy meant to difplay (and not feebly) the
graces of thcir art,—fhouid fuch enuobied
animais, not only be rivalled, but furpaffed
even in thofe graces, by a jade of Berchem,
or Paul Potter.
The next and iaft point of difference be-
tv/een us, is with refpedt to the plumage of
birds : Mr. Gilpin thinks the refuit of plu-
mage (and he makes no exception) is pic-
turefque; and the whoie feems to me an-
other ftrikin?inftance ofhis exclufive fond-
c*
nefs for that characler, and of his unwii-
lingnefs, on that account, to allow any
beauty, or merit-to fmoothnefs. Ind.eed, as
x he
tion of the art, fhould the horfes of Ra-
phaeljGiulio Romano, Polidore, N. Pouffin>
tlieforms and charaflers of which, fuchgreat
artifis had ftudied with almoft the fame
attention as thofe of the human figure ; in
which too (as in the human- figure) they
had corredted the defedts of common na-
ture from their own exalted ideas of beau-
ty, and from thofe of their great models the
ancient fculptors ; and in which they cer-
tainiy meant to difplay (and not feebly) the
graces of thcir art,—fhouid fuch enuobied
animais, not only be rivalled, but furpaffed
even in thofe graces, by a jade of Berchem,
or Paul Potter.
The next and iaft point of difference be-
tv/een us, is with refpedt to the plumage of
birds : Mr. Gilpin thinks the refuit of plu-
mage (and he makes no exception) is pic-
turefque; and the whoie feems to me an-
other ftrikin?inftance ofhis exclufive fond-
c*
nefs for that characler, and of his unwii-
lingnefs, on that account, to allow any
beauty, or merit-to fmoothnefs. Ind.eed, as
x he