App. I. ATTOUDA AND TRAPEZOPOLIS. i8q
d
been erased ; we may conjecture that they bore Nero's name, and that
the winners were rewarded with a garland and a statue; but the restora-
tion is of course uncertain. The expression NeiKtav Ylavaaviov (3' rod
Aiovoiaiov and Hava-aviov tov Havaaviov y seem to denote two brothers.
The stemma probably is
Dionysios
I
Pausanias
I
I I
Pausanias Epigonos (?)
Neikias Pausanias Pausanias.
The phrase ■naib'a tS>v ev yeyovoTwv is uncommon. It also occurs at
Aphrodisias, no. 72.
71. (R. 1884)......''A]bpa<r\jov AoKpi\ov tov d[£ioAo]ya>7-aro[u b.ya>vo\-
Oitov Sija (S]iov [. . . a\knrT7]v Aovy]eiviavbv [UoXv]xpoviov.
Polychronios was a common name at Aphrodisias (CIG 2828, 2839),
where a man named Adrastos Polychronios and a woman Polychronia
occur CIG 2824. The doubtful restoration AoupCov is taken from the
doubtful form in BCH 1890 p. 239.
APPENDIX II.
THE PHRYGO-CAEIAN FRONTIER.
Attouda, Trapezopolis, and Hydrela were included by Diocletian in his
province of Phrygia. The following cities were in strictness Carian
(except Brioula which was Lydian), but many of them are described by
some old authorities as Phrygian. The boundary between Caria and
Phrygia was very uncertain1. Strabo p. 586 includes the valleys of
1 Prof. Kiepert in the text accom- Caria was determined greatly by the
panying his map of Asia Provincia limits of the conventus of Alabanda, viz.
objects to my following the authority the river Maeander. There we have
of Strabo and assigning the Maeander a distinct and definite fact, which must
as the division between Caria and Lydia. govern the allocation of Roman coins.
It is certain that on this as on almost Further the Maeander was selected in
all questions of boundaiy there was a 190 as a limit between the Rhodian
good deal of divergence, especially in power and the Pergamenian; this fact
earlier time. But in the Roman time must determine the allocation of later
d
been erased ; we may conjecture that they bore Nero's name, and that
the winners were rewarded with a garland and a statue; but the restora-
tion is of course uncertain. The expression NeiKtav Ylavaaviov (3' rod
Aiovoiaiov and Hava-aviov tov Havaaviov y seem to denote two brothers.
The stemma probably is
Dionysios
I
Pausanias
I
I I
Pausanias Epigonos (?)
Neikias Pausanias Pausanias.
The phrase ■naib'a tS>v ev yeyovoTwv is uncommon. It also occurs at
Aphrodisias, no. 72.
71. (R. 1884)......''A]bpa<r\jov AoKpi\ov tov d[£ioAo]ya>7-aro[u b.ya>vo\-
Oitov Sija (S]iov [. . . a\knrT7]v Aovy]eiviavbv [UoXv]xpoviov.
Polychronios was a common name at Aphrodisias (CIG 2828, 2839),
where a man named Adrastos Polychronios and a woman Polychronia
occur CIG 2824. The doubtful restoration AoupCov is taken from the
doubtful form in BCH 1890 p. 239.
APPENDIX II.
THE PHRYGO-CAEIAN FRONTIER.
Attouda, Trapezopolis, and Hydrela were included by Diocletian in his
province of Phrygia. The following cities were in strictness Carian
(except Brioula which was Lydian), but many of them are described by
some old authorities as Phrygian. The boundary between Caria and
Phrygia was very uncertain1. Strabo p. 586 includes the valleys of
1 Prof. Kiepert in the text accom- Caria was determined greatly by the
panying his map of Asia Provincia limits of the conventus of Alabanda, viz.
objects to my following the authority the river Maeander. There we have
of Strabo and assigning the Maeander a distinct and definite fact, which must
as the division between Caria and Lydia. govern the allocation of Roman coins.
It is certain that on this as on almost Further the Maeander was selected in
all questions of boundaiy there was a 190 as a limit between the Rhodian
good deal of divergence, especially in power and the Pergamenian; this fact
earlier time. But in the Roman time must determine the allocation of later