DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.4679#0333
App. I. INSCRIPTIONS OF THE KILLANIAN PLAIN. 307
109. (R. 1886). At Gebren: published by G. Hirscbfeld p. 323 with
slight difference. Y](6itXios) Aikivvios Aiyvs Hoo-eib'&VL ziiyrjv.
no. I need not repeat various epitaphs, given by A. H. Smith,
Sterrett, .Collignon, &c. But a dedication ['A]woA[X]wihos Att Y\XovtS>vi
i[tr]i<j>avi to \onrbv evKijv (A. H. Smith no. 27) is interesting, though
uncertain in text.
111. (R. 1886). At Gebren: badly published by Prof. G. Hirsehfeld
p. 32$. leparevovTos 2iA/3ou 8iV erovs bis tKaroo-Tov koX rerdpTov 2t'A/3oy
8ts km Kabaovas Xdp?;ros kclI Mrjvis 'AttoWwviov BaacXelbos A7ro'AAa>y<.
ei)(/]v: The date is a. d. 119-20 (Lydo-Phrygian era); 219-20 by Ciby-
ratic era seems too late for the style of the inscription. The name Silbos
recalls the.city-name Silbion or Siblia.
112. (R. 1886). Gebren. [6 belva] 'Arr^[8]os lepao-dpevos1 [t]ois [IbCois
teicvois ? K&1] 'Eva rrj yvvaiKt avrov pvTjpirjs yd\piv].
113. Sterrett 79. 'Apre'/xcoz' M. Kaknoypviov Auvyov bovXos oIkqvo\xos
Avovvcrco 0e(3 eirrjKoio evyfiv. Dyonysos in the copy.
114. (R. 1884). Published BCH 1878 p. 173, badly; and better by
A. H. Smith no. 4^ 'AItto koCttjs M. KaXirovpviov Aoyyov Trarpwvos IbCov
(bust of Zeus) M. KaX-ovpvws 'EwweiKO? p;i<r0am)s twv irepl "AXaarov
tottoov Ati Meyicrra). Epineikos is freedman of a Roman officer M. Cal-
purnius Longus. The cognomen is unknown in the gens Calpurnia.
Calpurnius Longinus, aclvocatus fisci c. 166 A.Dvis mentioned Big. 28,4, 3.
M. Calpurnius Longus is mentioned also in no. 113. The opening lines
(omitted in BCH) are barely legible; and the first two words are a very
unusual variation of d-nb kolt&vos, and therefore must be pronounced
doubtful.
115. Published CIG 4366 x from Schonborn's copy; and by MM.
Duchesne and Collignon BCH 1878 p. 262. The copies differ greatly,
and neither gives a possible text, but by comparing them, the following
reading may be elicited, ol [ly 'AAdo-jra 7rap]a[$i>]Aa/drai 'Saovv 'Idcroi>[aj ?2
[MdpWos dperrjs ivenev nal dpoias rjs <z\u>v StareAei els avrovs.
1 In this word NO is duplicated hy 'S.aovv Wloppios 'idaova : the second name
error either of my copy or of the en- (like the Roman cognomen in early time)
graver. seems not to have heen part of the legal
2 A double name is possible, but not designation and comes usually after the
probable. The strict order would be father's name.
X 2
109. (R. 1886). At Gebren: published by G. Hirscbfeld p. 323 with
slight difference. Y](6itXios) Aikivvios Aiyvs Hoo-eib'&VL ziiyrjv.
no. I need not repeat various epitaphs, given by A. H. Smith,
Sterrett, .Collignon, &c. But a dedication ['A]woA[X]wihos Att Y\XovtS>vi
i[tr]i<j>avi to \onrbv evKijv (A. H. Smith no. 27) is interesting, though
uncertain in text.
111. (R. 1886). At Gebren: badly published by Prof. G. Hirsehfeld
p. 32$. leparevovTos 2iA/3ou 8iV erovs bis tKaroo-Tov koX rerdpTov 2t'A/3oy
8ts km Kabaovas Xdp?;ros kclI Mrjvis 'AttoWwviov BaacXelbos A7ro'AAa>y<.
ei)(/]v: The date is a. d. 119-20 (Lydo-Phrygian era); 219-20 by Ciby-
ratic era seems too late for the style of the inscription. The name Silbos
recalls the.city-name Silbion or Siblia.
112. (R. 1886). Gebren. [6 belva] 'Arr^[8]os lepao-dpevos1 [t]ois [IbCois
teicvois ? K&1] 'Eva rrj yvvaiKt avrov pvTjpirjs yd\piv].
113. Sterrett 79. 'Apre'/xcoz' M. Kaknoypviov Auvyov bovXos oIkqvo\xos
Avovvcrco 0e(3 eirrjKoio evyfiv. Dyonysos in the copy.
114. (R. 1884). Published BCH 1878 p. 173, badly; and better by
A. H. Smith no. 4^ 'AItto koCttjs M. KaXirovpviov Aoyyov Trarpwvos IbCov
(bust of Zeus) M. KaX-ovpvws 'EwweiKO? p;i<r0am)s twv irepl "AXaarov
tottoov Ati Meyicrra). Epineikos is freedman of a Roman officer M. Cal-
purnius Longus. The cognomen is unknown in the gens Calpurnia.
Calpurnius Longinus, aclvocatus fisci c. 166 A.Dvis mentioned Big. 28,4, 3.
M. Calpurnius Longus is mentioned also in no. 113. The opening lines
(omitted in BCH) are barely legible; and the first two words are a very
unusual variation of d-nb kolt&vos, and therefore must be pronounced
doubtful.
115. Published CIG 4366 x from Schonborn's copy; and by MM.
Duchesne and Collignon BCH 1878 p. 262. The copies differ greatly,
and neither gives a possible text, but by comparing them, the following
reading may be elicited, ol [ly 'AAdo-jra 7rap]a[$i>]Aa/drai 'Saovv 'Idcroi>[aj ?2
[MdpWos dperrjs ivenev nal dpoias rjs <z\u>v StareAei els avrovs.
1 In this word NO is duplicated hy 'S.aovv Wloppios 'idaova : the second name
error either of my copy or of the en- (like the Roman cognomen in early time)
graver. seems not to have heen part of the legal
2 A double name is possible, but not designation and comes usually after the
probable. The strict order would be father's name.
X 2