DOI Seite / Zitierlink:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.4679#0370
344 ADDENDA.
10. P. 78 no. 16. Philemon of Laodiceia1, a stone-cutter settled at
Limyra (possibly as early as 130 B. a), is mentioned in his own signature
on the wall of a rock-tomb (Benndorf Lylcia II p. 74). Q. Julius Miletus
of Tripolis of Asia was a marmorarius at Rome (Kaibel 1092, 1093)-
But, while many Laodiceans are mentioned in inscriptions of Rome,
implying much trading connexion, these persons are hardly ever sculptors
or stone-cutters, as the Aphrodisians at Rome usually were ; Laodicean
connexion with Rome was commercial, Aphrodisian connexion was
artistic.
11. P. 79 (19). A seal with the legend
2<3rep, crcppayi^ois tovs Ao'youj Ba<nA.eiou,
Aaohitceias itoiptvapyov avyKeXXov
has been published by M. Schlumberger Sigillographie de I'Emp. Byz.
p. 255- He dates it de Vepoque des Comnenes; and we may therefore
assign it to this Bishop. T>uip.r\v a bishop is common but -noipivapyos
an archbishop is, according to M. Schlumberger, unique.
12. P. 79 (21) Joannes. A seal (dating in cent. XIII or XIV) is
published by M. Schlumberger 1. c. p. 254, with legend [ep]e irpoo-KWov-
pie(vOv) TOV lK{iTrjv) (TOV TTap6(ive) CTK€1t(oi.s). diOTOKe f$Or\Qtl T(S (TO) S<wAo>
'Icoavvy pLrjTpoiro\(iTr)) AaobiKeias.
13. P. 82 n. 2. Zahn I.e. says: das aber hat Ramsay (JHS 1887
/;. 468 ff) gegen Duchesne (Rev. Quest. Efist. vol. 34 1883 ;;. 20) siegreich
dargethan, dass die TJntersclieidung von Phrygia Magna und Parva, von
loelclier sich, abgesehen von unserer Vita [Abercii], nur tmsichere Spuren
finden lassen (Ramsay I. I. p. 471/), ebenso wie die Vnterscheidung von
Prima-Secunda, de?- Zeit angehoren muss, ehe die Namen Paeatiana-Salutaris
allgemein iiblich geicorden sind, wie sie es seit Anfang des 5 Jahrhunderts
waren. I have now succeeded in adding one example more of each of
these rare terms, Parva and Secunda, confirming the conclusions already
accepted by Zahn.
14. P. 115 no. 18. A name of similar character to L. Aurelia Aemilia
occurs in the epitaph to p.vri\xa kvkov Mp.iXiov kikiov (at Miletos) BCIi
1894 p. 18 at Palatia. Here also the Roman character is assumed by
a Greek, who does not appreciate the propriety of nomenclature. He
had got the civitas, but did not thoroughly comprehend the Roman
system of names.
15. P. 120 (7 A). It is remarkable that Hierapolis should not be
] AavSiicevs dn-o Avkov : the spelling rates into AafiUeia, Tui'kish Ladik or
AavdUfia is found in all ages and seems Ladhik.
a local vulgarism ; it frequently degene-
10. P. 78 no. 16. Philemon of Laodiceia1, a stone-cutter settled at
Limyra (possibly as early as 130 B. a), is mentioned in his own signature
on the wall of a rock-tomb (Benndorf Lylcia II p. 74). Q. Julius Miletus
of Tripolis of Asia was a marmorarius at Rome (Kaibel 1092, 1093)-
But, while many Laodiceans are mentioned in inscriptions of Rome,
implying much trading connexion, these persons are hardly ever sculptors
or stone-cutters, as the Aphrodisians at Rome usually were ; Laodicean
connexion with Rome was commercial, Aphrodisian connexion was
artistic.
11. P. 79 (19). A seal with the legend
2<3rep, crcppayi^ois tovs Ao'youj Ba<nA.eiou,
Aaohitceias itoiptvapyov avyKeXXov
has been published by M. Schlumberger Sigillographie de I'Emp. Byz.
p. 255- He dates it de Vepoque des Comnenes; and we may therefore
assign it to this Bishop. T>uip.r\v a bishop is common but -noipivapyos
an archbishop is, according to M. Schlumberger, unique.
12. P. 79 (21) Joannes. A seal (dating in cent. XIII or XIV) is
published by M. Schlumberger 1. c. p. 254, with legend [ep]e irpoo-KWov-
pie(vOv) TOV lK{iTrjv) (TOV TTap6(ive) CTK€1t(oi.s). diOTOKe f$Or\Qtl T(S (TO) S<wAo>
'Icoavvy pLrjTpoiro\(iTr)) AaobiKeias.
13. P. 82 n. 2. Zahn I.e. says: das aber hat Ramsay (JHS 1887
/;. 468 ff) gegen Duchesne (Rev. Quest. Efist. vol. 34 1883 ;;. 20) siegreich
dargethan, dass die TJntersclieidung von Phrygia Magna und Parva, von
loelclier sich, abgesehen von unserer Vita [Abercii], nur tmsichere Spuren
finden lassen (Ramsay I. I. p. 471/), ebenso wie die Vnterscheidung von
Prima-Secunda, de?- Zeit angehoren muss, ehe die Namen Paeatiana-Salutaris
allgemein iiblich geicorden sind, wie sie es seit Anfang des 5 Jahrhunderts
waren. I have now succeeded in adding one example more of each of
these rare terms, Parva and Secunda, confirming the conclusions already
accepted by Zahn.
14. P. 115 no. 18. A name of similar character to L. Aurelia Aemilia
occurs in the epitaph to p.vri\xa kvkov Mp.iXiov kikiov (at Miletos) BCIi
1894 p. 18 at Palatia. Here also the Roman character is assumed by
a Greek, who does not appreciate the propriety of nomenclature. He
had got the civitas, but did not thoroughly comprehend the Roman
system of names.
15. P. 120 (7 A). It is remarkable that Hierapolis should not be
] AavSiicevs dn-o Avkov : the spelling rates into AafiUeia, Tui'kish Ladik or
AavdUfia is found in all ages and seems Ladhik.
a local vulgarism ; it frequently degene-