DOI Seite / Zitierlink:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.4679#0378
352 ADDENDA.
was treated in the same way in 129, and yet one can hardly douht that
western Lycaonia, like Phiygia Magna, was under Pontic rule after 129.
Either Lycaonia was not actually given to Eumenes, or, if it was, it was
soon captured by the Galatae and afterwards was reduced along with
Galatia by the Pontic kings (see Mi-. Rendall in Expositor April 1894
p. 356).
As to Milyas, we know even less. Ariassos of Milyas dated from
190-89 as an era, and that is an indication (as M. Reinach urges) that
the city was made free in that year (see my paper Rev. fit. Gr. 1892).
Probably no real power was ever exerted by Pergamenian kings south
of the Lysis valley, except in Attaleia; ana wie connexion with Attaleia
was maintained by sea rather than by land 1.
It is noteworthy that Livy changes the order of Polybius, giving undue
prominence to Lycaonia. He does this, apparently, in order to preserve
the order of XXXVII 54, 11; and this change may serve as an argument
that Lycaonia was introduced by him. The case must remain undecided
till further evidence as to the fate of Lycaonia in 190 is discovered.
Madvig read Mysiam regiam et Milyas in XXXVII 56, 2 ; M. Midler
calls it loco mendoso et lacuuoso, and alters the text (violentius).
37. P. 119. 28 bis. At Kara-Aitlar near Hierapolis; published by
M. Perrot Rev. Arch. 1876 I p. 278. [77 beiva ra beivi] elbeiui avbpl Oi-jpo-
rpocpM pvetas \apiv 778' avlQrjKiv' \epe Xe'yt Trapobires (i. e. XaVe ^eyet
-TTcpobCTcus). The buried man was employed in attending to the animals
destined for venationes in Laodiceia and Hierapolis, see p. 76 f. M.
Perrot reads [M]ei§eiu, and expl'MT'0 differently. ?;Se is inserted to get
a rude hexameter.
38. P. 202 note. The genitive erov occurs in a Christian inscription
of Eumeneia, see Ch. XII.
39. P. 178 1. 22. This inscription is also published by Dr. Buresch
Eh. Mus. 1894 p. 424 and Ath. Mitth. 1894 Heft I.
40. P. 316 1. 1. The adj. ILo-tSta? (Acts XIII 14), given in most
editions of Ptolemy after <t>pvyias, is necessitated by the Latin text, but
is omitted in the Greek MSS. The adj. was mistaken for a noun and
put after 'EeKevKeia (next word) ; and the error affected also the Latin
text, which gives Pisidiae twice.
1 Three land-roads connected Perga- independent, and the third, the longest,
nios and Attaleia, the best guarded by by Panemou-Teichos, of which nothing
Termessos and Cibyra, both indepen- is known. Termessos was in close alli-
dent, the next by Ariassos, probably a^nce with Pergamos, but as a free city.
was treated in the same way in 129, and yet one can hardly douht that
western Lycaonia, like Phiygia Magna, was under Pontic rule after 129.
Either Lycaonia was not actually given to Eumenes, or, if it was, it was
soon captured by the Galatae and afterwards was reduced along with
Galatia by the Pontic kings (see Mi-. Rendall in Expositor April 1894
p. 356).
As to Milyas, we know even less. Ariassos of Milyas dated from
190-89 as an era, and that is an indication (as M. Reinach urges) that
the city was made free in that year (see my paper Rev. fit. Gr. 1892).
Probably no real power was ever exerted by Pergamenian kings south
of the Lysis valley, except in Attaleia; ana wie connexion with Attaleia
was maintained by sea rather than by land 1.
It is noteworthy that Livy changes the order of Polybius, giving undue
prominence to Lycaonia. He does this, apparently, in order to preserve
the order of XXXVII 54, 11; and this change may serve as an argument
that Lycaonia was introduced by him. The case must remain undecided
till further evidence as to the fate of Lycaonia in 190 is discovered.
Madvig read Mysiam regiam et Milyas in XXXVII 56, 2 ; M. Midler
calls it loco mendoso et lacuuoso, and alters the text (violentius).
37. P. 119. 28 bis. At Kara-Aitlar near Hierapolis; published by
M. Perrot Rev. Arch. 1876 I p. 278. [77 beiva ra beivi] elbeiui avbpl Oi-jpo-
rpocpM pvetas \apiv 778' avlQrjKiv' \epe Xe'yt Trapobires (i. e. XaVe ^eyet
-TTcpobCTcus). The buried man was employed in attending to the animals
destined for venationes in Laodiceia and Hierapolis, see p. 76 f. M.
Perrot reads [M]ei§eiu, and expl'MT'0 differently. ?;Se is inserted to get
a rude hexameter.
38. P. 202 note. The genitive erov occurs in a Christian inscription
of Eumeneia, see Ch. XII.
39. P. 178 1. 22. This inscription is also published by Dr. Buresch
Eh. Mus. 1894 p. 424 and Ath. Mitth. 1894 Heft I.
40. P. 316 1. 1. The adj. ILo-tSta? (Acts XIII 14), given in most
editions of Ptolemy after <t>pvyias, is necessitated by the Latin text, but
is omitted in the Greek MSS. The adj. was mistaken for a noun and
put after 'EeKevKeia (next word) ; and the error affected also the Latin
text, which gives Pisidiae twice.
1 Three land-roads connected Perga- independent, and the third, the longest,
nios and Attaleia, the best guarded by by Panemou-Teichos, of which nothing
Termessos and Cibyra, both indepen- is known. Termessos was in close alli-
dent, the next by Ariassos, probably a^nce with Pergamos, but as a free city.