DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.4680#0287
6i8 XIII. THE BANAZ-OVA.
6. Trajanopolis.
i . Metrodorus ? see Temenothyrai.
2. Joannes c. 460.
3. Joannes 536.
4. Asignius S55-
5. Tiberius 692.
6. Philippus TpavovTiokeoos 787.
7. Eustratius 879.
7. Temenothyrai and Flaviopolis.
1. Metrodorus fourth century ? see above.
2. Matthias Tefj.evov &vpav 431 (falsely attributed by Le Quien to
Themizoniunx, see p. 274).
3. Gregorius TiixevovOripuiv jSj.
8. Alia.
1. Gaius TTokews 'A\iav(nv {civ. Aegaronmi) 451.
2. Glaucus ep. Alionorum civ. Phrygiae Pacatianae provinciae 553.
3. Leo or Leontius 'Akimv (implying an ethnic 'AAew, different from
the legend on coins 'Akirjv&v) 787.
' . n " > rival Ignatian and Photian bishops.
Georgius 879 J
APPENDIX III.
ROUTES IN BANAZ AND TCHAL DISTEICTS.
The views stated m these pages are founded on patient survey of the
localities. I entered the country with no opinions, ready to be led by
the evidence in any direction. The country was almost unknown; and
opinions were impossible from dearth of maps and facts. I looked for
traces of ancient life, and accepted as an ancient site any place where
I found traces of ancient life. That prejudice against the opinions of
others, with which M. Radet charges me repeatedly1, could not possibly
1 I regarded it as a joke on his part, the first part of this work). I have
and quoted some of his words in a foot- pondered for months over some of his
note I p. xvi; but he repeats the same opinions, which finally I could not ac-
charge in milder terms Eev. Univ. Midi cept, see p. xvii.
II p. 115 (in a very generous notice of
6. Trajanopolis.
i . Metrodorus ? see Temenothyrai.
2. Joannes c. 460.
3. Joannes 536.
4. Asignius S55-
5. Tiberius 692.
6. Philippus TpavovTiokeoos 787.
7. Eustratius 879.
7. Temenothyrai and Flaviopolis.
1. Metrodorus fourth century ? see above.
2. Matthias Tefj.evov &vpav 431 (falsely attributed by Le Quien to
Themizoniunx, see p. 274).
3. Gregorius TiixevovOripuiv jSj.
8. Alia.
1. Gaius TTokews 'A\iav(nv {civ. Aegaronmi) 451.
2. Glaucus ep. Alionorum civ. Phrygiae Pacatianae provinciae 553.
3. Leo or Leontius 'Akimv (implying an ethnic 'AAew, different from
the legend on coins 'Akirjv&v) 787.
' . n " > rival Ignatian and Photian bishops.
Georgius 879 J
APPENDIX III.
ROUTES IN BANAZ AND TCHAL DISTEICTS.
The views stated m these pages are founded on patient survey of the
localities. I entered the country with no opinions, ready to be led by
the evidence in any direction. The country was almost unknown; and
opinions were impossible from dearth of maps and facts. I looked for
traces of ancient life, and accepted as an ancient site any place where
I found traces of ancient life. That prejudice against the opinions of
others, with which M. Radet charges me repeatedly1, could not possibly
1 I regarded it as a joke on his part, the first part of this work). I have
and quoted some of his words in a foot- pondered for months over some of his
note I p. xvi; but he repeats the same opinions, which finally I could not ac-
charge in milder terms Eev. Univ. Midi cept, see p. xvii.
II p. 115 (in a very generous notice of