Universitätsbibliothek HeidelbergUniversitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Überblick
loading ...
Faksimile
0.5
1 cm
facsimile
Vollansicht
OCR-Volltext
CORRECTIONS OF VIEWS IN PART I. 787

P. 212, n. 2, and p. 111, n. 3 on Ephebarch see p. 444.

Pp. 223 ff. Justinianopolis and Oikokome must be placed elsewhere,
pp. 574 f, 578 f. The village near Tchandir and Sungurlu must be
called simply Vicus, and the fortress above Khoma simply Soublaion or
Khoma. (This returns to my view in OB part I, and approximates to
M. Radet's view.)

P. 239. Delete the remarks about Keramon-Agora, and see p. 595.
This returns very nearly to my view in CB part II and Hist. Geogr., and
agrees with M. Radet.

P. 295. Aristides Or. XXIII vol. I p. 451 (490) mentions to iepbv tov
'AttoWovos to iv r<3 opei t<2 Mt\ua. Is this the hieron of the Milyadic or
Kyllanian Estates ?

In a scholarly review of Part I in Eeiermaims Mitt. 1896 Heft 11
no. 705, Dr. Ruge blames me for omitting 4 bishops, Elpidius of Laodi-
ceia a. d. 394, Faustus of Lysinia 381, Eunepios of Maximianopolis 431,
Basil of Palaeopolis 451. He has been misled by names : Elpidius was
bishop of Laodiceia of Syria, Eunepios of Maximianopolis of Thrace,
Basil of Palaeopolis of Asia, while Faustus belonged to Limnai of Pisidia
(the marginal reading Liminenses is right, Hist. Geogr. Table facing p. 388):
Ruge fails to observe that Faustus was a Pisidian Bishop, but Lysinia
was in Pamphylia II.
 
Annotationen