Universitätsbibliothek HeidelbergUniversitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
Metadaten

Studio: international art — 3.1894

DOI article:
The editor's room
DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.17190#0213
Overview
Facsimile
0.5
1 cm
facsimile
Scroll
OCR fulltext
first prize

Awards in "The Studio" Prize Competitions

all are distinctly good. Blackbird (Miss E. Aird, but hardly sufficiently defined for practical pur-
South Kensington): a delicate and highly finished poses. Eric (A. Webster, Glasgow): accomplished,
drawing, but absolutely unsuited for the purpose, but lacks "colour." Escutcheon (Walter Scutt,
Black and White (W. Rowe, Jun., Clapham, S.W.): Crediton): too full of confused lines. Fir (C. W.
good, but only suited for fairly fine printing. Blue Crosby, Dorking): a very excellent drawing that
Bell (C. E. Masters, Maidstone): the cross hatch- nearly gained a prize, but far too highly finished
ing would not reduce in a satisfactory manner. Box to reduce successfully. Fledgling (Miss Jean
(G. Stevenson, Leeds): vigorous and practical, but Mitchell, Sheffield): two quite simple and capital

sketches worthy of special commen-
dation. Frebert (F. Wallington, Ful-
ham, S.W.): meritorious. Fusi-yama
(Miss Dora Thomas, Llandudno):
good, as a drawing. Herald (W. Wilson,
Edinburgh): a nice drawing in its
way. Hyacinth (Laura Edwardes Jones,
Wimbledon Hill, S.W.): effective when
reduced. If at first, &*c. (Harold Oak-
ley, Chislehurst): good work wasted for
its particular purpose. Ionis (Miss
Violet M. Parker, Edgbaston): a draw-
ing with a pleasant sense of decorative
detail, yet not well suited for a small
block. Iris (Mrs. J. Earwaker, Aber-
gele) : an excellent working version.
Jap (Chas. Pears, Pontefract): the
good qualities in these two drawings
a little confused. Caerneagh (W. Nassau Allen, are marred by an absence of " colour," a few
Dublin): much of the detail would be impossible, solid shades would have helped them much.
Chrysanthemum (Miss Mary E. Postlethwaite, Ko-Ko (A. B. Tabb, Egremont): nicely interpreted.
Kilburn, N.W.) : the trees in the background are lambeth (R. H. Smith, Westcombe Park, S.E.):
not open enough. Crayon (G. F. A.
Belcher, Spa, Gloucestershire): a grace-
ful and pleasant drawing. Crocodile
(Arthur E. McKewan, Birmingham):
good, and quite practicable. Crow
(H. Malcolm Miller, 9 Claremont
Road, Sale): as a drawing very good,
but quite unsuitable for the purpose set
in the conditions. Daisy (J. A. Atkins,
Shipley, Yorks): the novel technique in
this would possibly give a very pleasant
effect with careful printing on good
paper. Darkie (C. Richardson, Peters-
field) : despite the breadth of its masses,
the cross hatching in parts would defeat
the end in view. Devonshire lassie
(Miss Garford Garford, Teignmouth): second prize
the only drawing sent in that errs on

the side of over-simplicity, yet this fault is almost good colour. Lay Figure (J. B. Harrison, Dar-
a virtue, and deserves praise rather than blame, lington): a very workmanlike rendering. leukos
Elise (Mrs. Forbes, Bishop's Stortford) : a vigorous (H. M. White, Stonehouse, Gloucester): lacks
pen-and-ink design, hopeless in reduction for rapid definite handling. Lux (B. A. Lewis, Carmarthen):
printing. Emil(R. J. Richardson,Upper Norwood, a diawing well to the front. Nomad (Miss E. C.
S.E.) : a convention of its own, novel and effective, Woodward, Chelsea): good. Octavo (G. H. Villy,

' woodland
 
Annotationen