53
loci Exod. III, 14.
et quicquam de eo propalari nefarium dicunt.
Tosephus Ant. IT, 12, 4. Mcovcrig, inquit, $eyj-
&elg rjVTisiohst jmjbe ovofxxTog avtm 'yvujcnv t#
iSia <f)$ovr)7<xi' (poovng b clvtco fj.sTZo-yYyxoTi xxi
O-^rCOg STl XCtl TY\V TT QOTYjyCfSlClV SITTSIV' iw, dvow
OM0fJ.0t.T0g CCVTOV TTX^SiVCii Toig Uostcig 7r«£«-
xaAvj. y.cct 0 <dsog t8toc trr]/j.xivsi Tr,v solvtu tsjjs-
tyr /o^iccv cv tt^otsoov sig avS^ooTrzg 7r«p?A-&8-
0-sstv riEPi m OT MOI ©EMIS EIITEIN.
Et Philo de vita Molis 1. III. p. 152, 10. ed.
Mang. x^vcav (th U^stcg} ‘ttsto.Kov tatyavei <re-
(px\og ebrifJu&zysiTO, tetto.qv.g syov yhvQxs
cvofJ.ct.Tcg, 6 (JLcvoig toig ootx xcu yPocTT«v <to-
(pa zgttadagj/usvj/? ds/aig axxeiv y.<xi Ksysiv sv
dyioig, xKhco Is zbevi to orx^xirctv 8ba.fj.ii a),
cum quo loco consentit alius Siracidae Cap.
XLV, 14.) quo cum eadem res narretur, no-
tabile est idem HliT' nomen eadem prouidentia
reticeri, ‘gsCpxvcv yjpovw stcxvoj xibc.^scog sxru-
7TXsJLa. crtpgxyibcg AFIASMATOS b). Vnde
* effi-
a) Ed: quidem alius Philonis locus de vi t. Mos. IIT.
p. 155, 10. quo Entis signincationem nomine eo
contineri contenditur: xovgzv wsraAov, <1. Tctn» rrr*
ru-gwv c.t yAvlpzi ypv.y.y,ctruv cvzvtffsxyivjqav.v' i?;
oiv 0V0U.X TOT ONTOS (pxoi ytj.vcd^su, ws cv/,
olov re oy ovev uxTot,xkyyjtu>s cvptivas ri ruv ov-
ruv. Sed nomen m Onos aperte ex Vers. Ale-
xandrina est repetitum, cuius 0 ST Philone, Plato-
nico sensu acceptum fuisse non est mirandum,
b) Vtroque hoc lofephi et Philonis loco extra omnem
dubitationem ponitur id t iam eorum tempore ticuijfe
D 3 nulli
loci Exod. III, 14.
et quicquam de eo propalari nefarium dicunt.
Tosephus Ant. IT, 12, 4. Mcovcrig, inquit, $eyj-
&elg rjVTisiohst jmjbe ovofxxTog avtm 'yvujcnv t#
iSia <f)$ovr)7<xi' (poovng b clvtco fj.sTZo-yYyxoTi xxi
O-^rCOg STl XCtl TY\V TT QOTYjyCfSlClV SITTSIV' iw, dvow
OM0fJ.0t.T0g CCVTOV TTX^SiVCii Toig Uostcig 7r«£«-
xaAvj. y.cct 0 <dsog t8toc trr]/j.xivsi Tr,v solvtu tsjjs-
tyr /o^iccv cv tt^otsoov sig avS^ooTrzg 7r«p?A-&8-
0-sstv riEPi m OT MOI ©EMIS EIITEIN.
Et Philo de vita Molis 1. III. p. 152, 10. ed.
Mang. x^vcav (th U^stcg} ‘ttsto.Kov tatyavei <re-
(px\og ebrifJu&zysiTO, tetto.qv.g syov yhvQxs
cvofJ.ct.Tcg, 6 (JLcvoig toig ootx xcu yPocTT«v <to-
(pa zgttadagj/usvj/? ds/aig axxeiv y.<xi Ksysiv sv
dyioig, xKhco Is zbevi to orx^xirctv 8ba.fj.ii a),
cum quo loco consentit alius Siracidae Cap.
XLV, 14.) quo cum eadem res narretur, no-
tabile est idem HliT' nomen eadem prouidentia
reticeri, ‘gsCpxvcv yjpovw stcxvoj xibc.^scog sxru-
7TXsJLa. crtpgxyibcg AFIASMATOS b). Vnde
* effi-
a) Ed: quidem alius Philonis locus de vi t. Mos. IIT.
p. 155, 10. quo Entis signincationem nomine eo
contineri contenditur: xovgzv wsraAov, <1. Tctn» rrr*
ru-gwv c.t yAvlpzi ypv.y.y,ctruv cvzvtffsxyivjqav.v' i?;
oiv 0V0U.X TOT ONTOS (pxoi ytj.vcd^su, ws cv/,
olov re oy ovev uxTot,xkyyjtu>s cvptivas ri ruv ov-
ruv. Sed nomen m Onos aperte ex Vers. Ale-
xandrina est repetitum, cuius 0 ST Philone, Plato-
nico sensu acceptum fuisse non est mirandum,
b) Vtroque hoc lofephi et Philonis loco extra omnem
dubitationem ponitur id t iam eorum tempore ticuijfe
D 3 nulli