DOI Heft:
Nr. 3-4
DOI Artikel:Monkiewicz, Maciej: Ter Brugghen and Honthorst in Poland
DOI Seite / Zitierlink: https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.18945#0233
a caption, he suggested an earlier date than that set by Slatkes.5 In the same
year, in essays for a symposium held in connection with the exhibition in
Braunschweig, Slatkes agreed to some extent with Schnackenburg, accepting
the Lublin Pilate as the best of the known versions and dated the prime original
5 B. Schnackenburg, [review of Holländische Malerei in neuem Licht, exh. cat.], Kunstchronik 40
(1987), pp.174-175, Abb. 7.
3. Hendrick ter Brugghen,
Pilate Washing his Hands,
Lublin, Muzeum Lubelskie,
X-ray radiograph detail
(turban)
223
year, in essays for a symposium held in connection with the exhibition in
Braunschweig, Slatkes agreed to some extent with Schnackenburg, accepting
the Lublin Pilate as the best of the known versions and dated the prime original
5 B. Schnackenburg, [review of Holländische Malerei in neuem Licht, exh. cat.], Kunstchronik 40
(1987), pp.174-175, Abb. 7.
3. Hendrick ter Brugghen,
Pilate Washing his Hands,
Lublin, Muzeum Lubelskie,
X-ray radiograph detail
(turban)
223