DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.29591#0328
324
Charpentier, Uttaradhyayanasutram
8. This verse, which rather spoils the legend, is clearly a
later interpolation.
10. Cp. Jat. 497, g. 2. — viyarijjai \ vitiryate diyate. For
janeku, cp. Pischel § 510 extr. S. reads jdyanajivino tti, but adds:
dvitiydrthe scisthi | pdthantare tu prathcimd which must mean, as far
as I understand, that it was taken sometimes as a plural nomi-
native.
11. Cp. Jat. 497, g. 3. D. quotes the following verse:
na sudrdya matim dadydn nocchistam na haviskrtam j
na cdsyopadised dharmam na ccisya vratam cidiset ||
which is taken from Manu IV, 80.
12. Cp. Jat. 497, g. 4. S. mentions a varia lectio: ardhagd
Jioha sapunnakliettd. D. reads dsamsae, which does violence to the
metre; asasae is probably a form of the same sort as those enu-
merated by Pischel § 593; the Jat. has asasand. For dalai cp.
Hoernle Uvas. II, n. 287.
13. Cp. Jat. 497, g. 5. D. quotes this verse:
samam asrotriye dcinam dvigunam bralimane bruve |
sahasragunam dearye anantam vedapdrage ||
14. Cp. Jat. 497, g. 6. About vihuna- cp. Pischel § 120.
D. quotes the following verses (from the MBh. ?):
ekavarnam idam sarvam purvam dsid yudhisthira j
kriydkarmavibhdgena cdturvarnyam vyavasthitam ||
brdhmano brahmacaryena yathasilpena silpikali |
anyathd ndmamdtram sydd indrag op akakitav at |[
15. Cp. Jat. 497, g. 7. i8d. There is a varia lectio bhdra-
vahd according to S. ■—- D. says: tatlid ca veddnuvddinah jj
caren madhukarim vrttirn api mlecchakuldd api \
ekdnnam ndiva bhunjita Brhaspatisamad api ||
Cp. BR. s. v. mddhukara, madhukdra and Sieg, Sagenstoffe
p. 9.
17. D. gives the following quotation:
dadhimadhughrtdny apdtre ksiptdni yathdsu nasam upaydnti |
evam apdtre dattdni kevalam nasam upaydnti ||
Charpentier, Uttaradhyayanasutram
8. This verse, which rather spoils the legend, is clearly a
later interpolation.
10. Cp. Jat. 497, g. 2. — viyarijjai \ vitiryate diyate. For
janeku, cp. Pischel § 510 extr. S. reads jdyanajivino tti, but adds:
dvitiydrthe scisthi | pdthantare tu prathcimd which must mean, as far
as I understand, that it was taken sometimes as a plural nomi-
native.
11. Cp. Jat. 497, g. 3. D. quotes the following verse:
na sudrdya matim dadydn nocchistam na haviskrtam j
na cdsyopadised dharmam na ccisya vratam cidiset ||
which is taken from Manu IV, 80.
12. Cp. Jat. 497, g. 4. S. mentions a varia lectio: ardhagd
Jioha sapunnakliettd. D. reads dsamsae, which does violence to the
metre; asasae is probably a form of the same sort as those enu-
merated by Pischel § 593; the Jat. has asasand. For dalai cp.
Hoernle Uvas. II, n. 287.
13. Cp. Jat. 497, g. 5. D. quotes this verse:
samam asrotriye dcinam dvigunam bralimane bruve |
sahasragunam dearye anantam vedapdrage ||
14. Cp. Jat. 497, g. 6. About vihuna- cp. Pischel § 120.
D. quotes the following verses (from the MBh. ?):
ekavarnam idam sarvam purvam dsid yudhisthira j
kriydkarmavibhdgena cdturvarnyam vyavasthitam ||
brdhmano brahmacaryena yathasilpena silpikali |
anyathd ndmamdtram sydd indrag op akakitav at |[
15. Cp. Jat. 497, g. 7. i8d. There is a varia lectio bhdra-
vahd according to S. ■—- D. says: tatlid ca veddnuvddinah jj
caren madhukarim vrttirn api mlecchakuldd api \
ekdnnam ndiva bhunjita Brhaspatisamad api ||
Cp. BR. s. v. mddhukara, madhukdra and Sieg, Sagenstoffe
p. 9.
17. D. gives the following quotation:
dadhimadhughrtdny apdtre ksiptdni yathdsu nasam upaydnti |
evam apdtre dattdni kevalam nasam upaydnti ||