DOI Page / Citation link:
https://doi.org/10.11588/diglit.30697#0308
300
MISCELLANEOUS. \_Without Date.
679. Discordia Predicatorum et Minorum cum
Clero Seculari, &c. TVithout Name ofPrinter,
Place, or Date. Quarto.
This volume seems to be from the press of Boettiger: see p. 197 ante.
The title, in black letter, is divided into two sections, and is litterally
thus : e Incipit vtilis et quottidianus tractatulus de discordia predicatoru
et minoru cum clero seculari Et primo quo ad predicatione eorum,
Secundo de modo audiendi confessiones, Tertio de sepultura sm iuriu
determlatione. ltem quottidiana questio cu sua determinatione Vtru
Emere decem marcas (pro centuz annuatim pro se et suis heredib9
ordine successorio) subleuandas in perpetuuz vel ad tempus sit
otractus licit9 et a iure permissus an vsurarius.’ On a ij, recto, thfe
work begins witliout a prefix, and concludes on B vj, reverse, (in sixes)
without indication of time, place, or name of printer. In the whole,
12 leaves. A very fair and neat copy, in russia binding.
680. Decisiones Rotje Romanje. Printed hy
Laver. Rome. 1475. Folio.
If the intrinsic value or curiosity of this volume were equal to its
dimensions, we should consider it a treasure of no trissing importance ;
but when the reader is informed that this most elaborate specimen of
the press of Laver, contains what is only likely to be interesting to
the foi eign lawyer, engaged in the decisions of thf, Roman Catholic
courts, he may probably feel little disposition to possess it. Never-
theless, it finds a place with propriety in a Library like the present.
AudifFredi, as might have been expected, is copious and particular.
Seemiller and Fossi are coinparatively concise. We may observe a
raedium between them.
According to Audiffredi, this volume should contain sour distinct
impressions or parts, to each of which the colophon of the printer is
subjoined. The present copy has all the parts, and is an unusually
large volume. The first set of Decisions were originally collected by
IIorborch, A.D. 1375 ; the second is ealled Ancient Decisions; the
third were collected by Bernardus de Bisgneto, A. D. ’1372; and
MISCELLANEOUS. \_Without Date.
679. Discordia Predicatorum et Minorum cum
Clero Seculari, &c. TVithout Name ofPrinter,
Place, or Date. Quarto.
This volume seems to be from the press of Boettiger: see p. 197 ante.
The title, in black letter, is divided into two sections, and is litterally
thus : e Incipit vtilis et quottidianus tractatulus de discordia predicatoru
et minoru cum clero seculari Et primo quo ad predicatione eorum,
Secundo de modo audiendi confessiones, Tertio de sepultura sm iuriu
determlatione. ltem quottidiana questio cu sua determinatione Vtru
Emere decem marcas (pro centuz annuatim pro se et suis heredib9
ordine successorio) subleuandas in perpetuuz vel ad tempus sit
otractus licit9 et a iure permissus an vsurarius.’ On a ij, recto, thfe
work begins witliout a prefix, and concludes on B vj, reverse, (in sixes)
without indication of time, place, or name of printer. In the whole,
12 leaves. A very fair and neat copy, in russia binding.
680. Decisiones Rotje Romanje. Printed hy
Laver. Rome. 1475. Folio.
If the intrinsic value or curiosity of this volume were equal to its
dimensions, we should consider it a treasure of no trissing importance ;
but when the reader is informed that this most elaborate specimen of
the press of Laver, contains what is only likely to be interesting to
the foi eign lawyer, engaged in the decisions of thf, Roman Catholic
courts, he may probably feel little disposition to possess it. Never-
theless, it finds a place with propriety in a Library like the present.
AudifFredi, as might have been expected, is copious and particular.
Seemiller and Fossi are coinparatively concise. We may observe a
raedium between them.
According to Audiffredi, this volume should contain sour distinct
impressions or parts, to each of which the colophon of the printer is
subjoined. The present copy has all the parts, and is an unusually
large volume. The first set of Decisions were originally collected by
IIorborch, A.D. 1375 ; the second is ealled Ancient Decisions; the
third were collected by Bernardus de Bisgneto, A. D. ’1372; and